TSTP Solution File: ITP001_2 by Vampire---4.8

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Vampire---4.8
% Problem  : ITP001_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s

% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sun May  5 06:46:26 EDT 2024

% Result   : Theorem 0.61s 0.80s
% Output   : Refutation 0.61s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :   13
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   16 (   4 unt;  12 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :    4 (   0 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    1 (   1   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    0 (   0 avg)
%            Number of types       :    4 (   2 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :   10 (   7   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    3 (   1 usr;   2 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    9 (   9 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    0 (   0   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(type_def_5,type,
    del: $tType ).

tff(type_def_6,type,
    tp__o: $tType ).

tff(func_def_0,type,
    bool: del ).

tff(func_def_1,type,
    ind: del ).

tff(func_def_2,type,
    arr: ( del * del ) > del ).

tff(func_def_4,type,
    k: ( del * $i ) > $i ).

tff(func_def_5,type,
    i: del > $i ).

tff(func_def_6,type,
    inj__o: tp__o > $i ).

tff(func_def_7,type,
    surj__o: $i > tp__o ).

tff(func_def_9,type,
    fo__c_2Ebool_2ET: tp__o ).

tff(func_def_10,type,
    c_2Emin_2E_3D: del > $i ).

tff(pred_def_1,type,
    mem: ( $i * del ) > $o ).

fof(f18,plain,
    $false,
    inference(cnf_transformation,[],[f17]) ).

fof(f17,plain,
    $false,
    inference(true_and_false_elimination,[],[f16]) ).

fof(f16,negated_conjecture,
    ~ $true,
    inference(negated_conjecture,[],[f15]) ).

fof(f15,conjecture,
    $true,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ba47LwlTb2/Vampire---4.8_21517',conj_thm_2Ebool_2ETRUTH) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.05/0.10  % Problem    : ITP001_2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v7.5.0.
% 0.05/0.11  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.32  % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.32  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.32  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.32  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.32  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.32  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 19:08:52 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.32  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.12/0.32  This is a TF0_THM_EQU_NAR problem
% 0.12/0.32  Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.ba47LwlTb2/Vampire---4.8_21517
% 0.61/0.79  % (21633)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21630)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21632)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21635)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21631)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21634)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21636)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21637)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on Vampire---4 for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.61/0.79  % (21632)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21635)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21636)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21630)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21633)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21631)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21634)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21637)First to succeed.
% 0.61/0.79  % (21637)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-21624"
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS status Theorem for Vampire---4
% 0.61/0.80  % SZS output start Proof for Vampire---4
% See solution above
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)------------------------------
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.61/0.80  
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Memory used [KB]: 962
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.61/0.80  % (21637)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 0.61/0.80  % (21624)Success in time 0.472 s
% 0.61/0.80  % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------