TSTP Solution File: HWV052-1.002.001 by SNARK---20120808r022
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem : HWV052-1.002.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run-snark %s %d
% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 19:11:23 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.75s 0.97s
% Output : Refutation 0.75s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 17 ( 11 unt; 6 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 28 ( 27 equ; 2 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 4 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-3 aty)
% Number of variables : 25 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(bit_domain,axiom,
( X = o
| X = i ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',bit_domain) ).
cnf(bit_inverse,axiom,
inv(X) != X,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',bit_inverse) ).
cnf(unpack2,axiom,
unpack2(X,Y,pack1(X,Y)) = Y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack2) ).
cnf(unpack2_05,axiom,
unpack2(X,inv(Y),pack1(X,Y)) = Y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack2_05) ).
cnf(unpack2_06,axiom,
unpack2(X,Y,inv(pack1(X,Y))) = Y,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',unpack2_06) ).
cnf(11,plain,
inv(o) = i,
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[bit_inverse,bit_domain]) ).
cnf(12,plain,
inv(i) = o,
inference('UR-RESOLVE',[status(thm)],[bit_domain,bit_inverse]) ).
cnf(13,plain,
( X = i
| Y = X
| Y = i ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[bit_domain,bit_domain,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(14,plain,
i != o,
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[bit_inverse,11,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(18,plain,
unpack2(X,i,pack1(X,o)) = o,
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[unpack2_05,11,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(22,plain,
unpack2(X,o,pack1(X,i)) = i,
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[unpack2_05,12,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(32,plain,
( Y = X
| X = i
| Z = Y
| U = Z
| U = Y ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,13,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(313,plain,
( Y = X
| Z = X
| Z = Y ),
inference('CONDENSE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,32,theory(equality)])]) ).
cnf(315,plain,
( Y = X
| inv(Y) = X ),
inference('HYPERRESOLVE',[status(thm)],[bit_inverse,313]) ).
cnf(331,plain,
( pack1(X,Y) = Z
| unpack2(X,Y,Z) = Y ),
inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[unpack2_06,315,theory(equality)]) ).
cnf(477,plain,
pack1(X,o) = pack1(X,i),
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[22,331,theory(equality)]),14]) ).
cnf(494,plain,
$false,
inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[18,14,unpack2,477,theory(equality)]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.09/0.11 % Problem : HWV052-1.002.001 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.09/0.12 % Command : run-snark %s %d
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Fri Jun 17 06:15:32 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.44 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.18/0.45 (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.18/0.45 (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.18/0.45 (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45 (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.18/0.45 (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.18/0.45 (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.18/0.45 (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 "."
% 0.18/0.45 *
% 0.18/0.45 ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-17T06:15:32
% 0.18/0.45 ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n022.cluster.edu at 2022-06-17T06:15:32
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97
% 0.75/0.97 #||
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.75/0.97 % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.75/0.98 ||#
% 0.75/0.98
% 0.75/0.98 ; Summary of computation:
% 0.75/0.98 ; 2976 formulas have been input or derived (from 80 formulas).
% 0.75/0.98 ; 494 (17%) were retained. Of these,
% 0.75/0.98 ; 166 (34%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.75/0.98 ; 328 (66%) are still being kept.
% 0.75/0.98 ;
% 0.75/0.98 ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.002 0% Read assertion file (1 call)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.000 0% Assert (10 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.050 10% Process new row (2,747 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.051 10% Resolution (158 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.015 3% Paramodulation (79 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.001 0% Factoring (42 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.066 13% Condensing (1,393 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.039 7% Forward subsumption (1,393 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.028 5% Backward subsumption (467 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.168 32% Clause clause subsumption (6,831 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.052 10% Forward simplification (2,688 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.002 0% Backward simplification (494 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.009 2% Ordering (6,779 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.000 0% Sortal reasoning (32 calls)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.000 0% Purity testing (1 call)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.038 7% Other
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.521 Total
% 0.75/0.98 ; 0.527 Real time
% 0.75/0.98 ;
% 0.75/0.98 ; Term-hash-array has 630 terms in all.
% 0.75/0.98 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 303 entries (329 at peak, 467 added, 164 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Feature-vector-row-index has 602 nodes (675 at peak, 872 added, 270 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Retrieved 6,079 possibly forward subsuming rows in 1,393 calls.
% 0.75/0.98 ; Retrieved 2,315 possibly backward subsumed rows in 467 calls.
% 0.75/0.98 ; Path-index has 441 entries (490 at peak, 643 added, 202 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Path-index has 262 nodes (278 at peak, 282 added, 20 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Trie-index has 441 entries (490 at peak, 643 added, 202 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Trie-index has 656 nodes (882 at peak, 1,000 added, 344 deleted).
% 0.75/0.98 ; Retrieved 4,386 generalization terms in 10,169 calls.
% 0.75/0.98 ; Retrieved 45 instance terms in 26 calls.
% 0.75/0.98 ; Retrieved 19,826 unifiable terms in 1,152 calls.
% 0.75/0.98 ;
% 0.75/0.98 ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 7 entries:
% 0.75/0.98 ; 7 with value 0
% 0.75/0.98 ; The agenda of rows to process has 23 entries:
% 0.75/0.98 ; 3 with value 19 4 with value 25 1 with value 28
% 0.75/0.98 ; 2 with value 21 1 with value 26 2 with value 29
% 0.75/0.98 ; 3 with value 23 4 with value 27 1 with value 31
% 0.75/0.98 ; 2 with value 24
% 0.75/0.98 ; The agenda of rows to give has 273 entries:
% 0.75/0.98 ; 1 with value (4 15) 42 with value (4 25) 7 with value (4 30)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 1 with value (4 20) 35 with value (4 26) 12 with value (4 31)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 3 with value (4 21) 50 with value (4 27) 7 with value (4 32)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 13 with value (4 22) 48 with value (4 28) 4 with value (4 33)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 7 with value (4 23) 13 with value (4 29) 4 with value (4 34)
% 0.75/0.98 ; 26 with value (4 24)
% 0.75/0.98 Evaluation took:
% 0.75/0.98 0.527 seconds of real time
% 0.75/0.98 0.485063 seconds of user run time
% 0.75/0.98 0.041896 seconds of system run time
% 0.75/0.98 [Run times include 0.018 seconds GC run time.]
% 0.75/0.98 0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.75/0.98 0 page faults and
% 0.75/0.98 50,300,520 bytes consed.
% 0.75/0.98 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.75/0.98 ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-17T06:15:33
% 0.75/0.98 :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.75/0.98 *
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------