TSTP Solution File: HWV025-3 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:58:17 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.53s
% Output : Refutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 11 ( 5 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 26 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of connectives : 24 ( 9 ~; 15 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 5 ( 5 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f216,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f215,f134]) ).
fof(f134,axiom,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
fof(f215,plain,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f212,f137]) ).
fof(f137,axiom,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
fof(f212,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f167,f136]) ).
fof(f136,axiom,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
fof(f167,plain,
! [X10] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f166,f13]) ).
fof(f13,axiom,
! [X6] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X6,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_14) ).
fof(f166,plain,
! [X10] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f52,f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
! [X10] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_27) ).
fof(f52,axiom,
! [X10] :
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1)))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_53) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 23:13:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.51 % (23101)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.20/0.51 % (23090)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (23079)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)dis+10_1:1_fsd=on:sp=occurrence:i=7:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/7Mi)
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Instruction limit reached!
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Termination reason: Unknown
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Termination phase: Saturation
% 0.20/0.52
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Memory used [KB]: 5628
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Time elapsed: 0.118 s
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (23084)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.52 % (23098)ott+3_1:1_gsp=on:lcm=predicate:i=138:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/138Mi)
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)First to succeed.
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.20/0.53 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.20/0.53
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Memory used [KB]: 1151
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Time elapsed: 0.133 s
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)Instructions burned: 12 (million)
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (23079)------------------------------
% 0.20/0.53 % (23073)Success in time 0.179 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------