TSTP Solution File: HWV025-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:36:59 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.49s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 9 unt; 8 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 52 ( 0 equ; 24 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 1 usr; 1 prp; 0-1 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 11 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_27,axiom,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_27) ).
cnf(axiom_14,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_14) ).
cnf(axiom_53,axiom,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/Axioms/HWV004-0.ax',axiom_53) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_53]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
c_0_6 ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1))) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]),c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(t_206)),
c_0_13 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
c_0_14 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : HWV025-3 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Sun May 19 11:29:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.20/0.47 Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.47 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.49 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # new_bool_3 with pid 12811 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 12814 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.20/0.49 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.49 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.20/0.49 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.49 # Preprocessing time : 0.003 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.49 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.49 # Parsed axioms : 137
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 103
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses : 34
% 0.20/0.49 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Initial clauses in saturation : 34
% 0.20/0.49 # Processed clauses : 49
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # ...remaining for further processing : 47
% 0.20/0.49 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-subsumed : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Generated clauses : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 5
% 0.20/0.49 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 9
% 0.20/0.49 # Paramodulations : 6
% 0.20/0.49 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # NegExts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Total rewrite steps : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of processed clauses : 14
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.20/0.49 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit-clauses : 4
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 17
% 0.20/0.49 # ...number of literals in the above : 56
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.20/0.49 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 68
% 0.20/0.49 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 29
% 0.20/0.49 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 14
% 0.20/0.49 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 2
% 0.20/0.49 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.20/0.49 # Termbank termtop insertions : 2930
% 0.20/0.49 # Search garbage collected termcells : 509
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.004 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.005 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1888 pages
% 0.20/0.49
% 0.20/0.49 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.49 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.49 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.20/0.49 # Maximum resident set size: 1812 pages
% 0.20/0.49 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------