TSTP Solution File: HWV023-1 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : HWV023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:25:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 1.15s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 12
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 31 ( 19 unt; 7 nHn; 24 RR)
% Number of literals : 53 ( 22 equ; 22 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 1 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,negated_conjecture,
level(t_139) = n1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_51,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(c_52,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(c_53,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Empty(plus(t_139,n1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(c_55,plain,
gt(plus(X0,n1),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_2) ).
cnf(c_58,plain,
( plus(X0,X1) != X2
| minus(X2,X1) = X0
| def_10(X1,X2) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_5) ).
cnf(c_60,plain,
( X0 != X1
| ~ def_10(X1,X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_7) ).
cnf(c_72,plain,
plus(n0,X0) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_19) ).
cnf(c_74,plain,
level(X0) = int_level(X0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(c_77,plain,
( int_level(X0) != n0
| p_Empty(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_24) ).
cnf(c_124,plain,
( ~ gt(int_level(X0),n0)
| ~ p_Rd(X0)
| minus(int_level(X0),n1) = int_level(plus(X0,n1))
| p_Wr(X0)
| p_Reset(X0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_71) ).
cnf(c_144,plain,
~ def_10(X0,X0),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_60]) ).
cnf(c_145,plain,
( minus(plus(X0,X1),X1) = X0
| def_10(X1,plus(X0,X1)) ),
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_58]) ).
cnf(c_356,plain,
( p_Empty(X0)
| int_level(X0) != n0 ),
inference(prop_impl_just,[status(thm)],[c_77]) ).
cnf(c_357,plain,
( int_level(X0) != n0
| p_Empty(X0) ),
inference(renaming,[status(thm)],[c_356]) ).
cnf(c_994,plain,
int_level(t_139) = n1,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_74]) ).
cnf(c_1455,plain,
( plus(t_139,n1) != X0
| int_level(X0) != n0 ),
inference(resolution_lifted,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_357]) ).
cnf(c_1456,plain,
int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) != n0,
inference(unflattening,[status(thm)],[c_1455]) ).
cnf(c_9573,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(t_139),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_52]) ).
cnf(c_9574,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(t_139),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_51]) ).
cnf(c_9575,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(t_139),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50]) ).
cnf(c_10674,plain,
gt(n1,n0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_55]) ).
cnf(c_11281,plain,
( minus(plus(n0,X0),X0) = n0
| def_10(X0,X0) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_72,c_145]) ).
cnf(c_11286,plain,
( minus(X0,X0) = n0
| def_10(X0,X0) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_11281,c_72]) ).
cnf(c_11287,plain,
minus(X0,X0) = n0,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_11286,c_144]) ).
cnf(c_12350,plain,
( ~ gt(n1,n0)
| ~ p_Rd(t_139)
| minus(int_level(t_139),n1) = int_level(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr(t_139)
| p_Reset(t_139) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_994,c_124]) ).
cnf(c_12356,plain,
( ~ gt(n1,n0)
| ~ p_Rd(t_139)
| int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) = minus(n1,n1)
| p_Wr(t_139)
| p_Reset(t_139) ),
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_12350,c_994]) ).
cnf(c_12357,plain,
int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) = minus(n1,n1),
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12356,c_9573,c_9575,c_9574,c_10674]) ).
cnf(c_12384,plain,
minus(n1,n1) != n0,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_1456,c_12357]) ).
cnf(c_12385,plain,
$false,
inference(forward_subsumption_resolution,[status(thm)],[c_12384,c_11287]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.11 % Problem : HWV023-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.12 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.33 % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.33 % DateTime : Fri May 3 00:59:24 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule fof_schedule --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ iProver source info
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 0.46/1.15 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 0.46/1.15 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Parsing...successful
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 1 sf_s rm: 21 0s sf_e pe_s pe:1:0s pe:2:0s pe_e sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 4 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 1 0s sf_e sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Problem Properties
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 clauses 55
% 0.46/1.15 conjectures 3
% 0.46/1.15 EPR 9
% 0.46/1.15 Horn 25
% 0.46/1.15 unary 11
% 0.46/1.15 binary 14
% 0.46/1.15 lits 155
% 0.46/1.15 lits eq 35
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pure 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo 0
% 0.46/1.15 fd_cond 1
% 0.46/1.15 fd_pseudo_cond 4
% 0.46/1.15 AC symbols 0
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Schedule dynamic 5 is on
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Input Options "--resolution_flag false --inst_lit_sel_side none" Time Limit: 10.
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15 Current options:
% 0.46/1.15 ------
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 ------ Proving...
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 0.46/1.15
% 0.46/1.15
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------