TSTP Solution File: HWV021-2 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : HWV021-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:40:39 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.57s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.57s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 11
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 22 ( 7 unt; 1 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 126 ( 3 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 6 avg)
% Number of connectives : 50 ( 23 ~; 26 |; 0 &)
% ( 1 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 4 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of FOOLs : 78 ( 78 fml; 0 var)
% Number of types : 2 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 2 ( 1 >; 1 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 15 ( 13 usr; 4 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 0 ( 0 usr; 0 con; --- aty)
% Number of variables : 19 ( 18 !; 0 ?; 19 :)
% ( 1 !>; 0 ?*; 0 @-; 0 @+)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_4,type,
sQ0_eqProxy:
!>[X0: $tType] : ( ( X0 * X0 ) > $o ) ).
tff(f217,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f216,f137]) ).
tff(f137,axiom,
~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
tff(f216,plain,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(t_206)),
inference(resolution,[],[f212,f177]) ).
tff(f177,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( ~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X0),n0)
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X0)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f168,f155]) ).
tff(f155,plain,
! [X4: $i] :
( ~ sQ0_eqProxy($i,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X4),n0)
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X4)) ),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f7,f138]) ).
tff(f138,plain,
! [X0: $tType,X2: X0,X1: X0] :
( sQ0_eqProxy(X0,X1,X2)
<=> ( X1 = X2 ) ),
introduced(equality_proxy_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[sQ0_eqProxy])]) ).
tff(f7,axiom,
! [X4: $i] :
( ( fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X4) != n0 )
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTempty_(X4)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_8) ).
tff(f168,plain,
! [X0: $i] :
( sQ0_eqProxy($i,X0,n0)
| ~ p_LES_EQU_(X0,n0) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f147,f59]) ).
tff(f59,axiom,
! [X28: $i] : ~ p_LES_EQU_(f_ADD_(X28,n1),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_60) ).
tff(f147,plain,
! [X38: $i,X37: $i] :
( p_LES_EQU_(f_ADD_(X37,n1),X38)
| sQ0_eqProxy($i,X37,X38)
| ~ p_LES_EQU_(X37,X38) ),
inference(equality_proxy_replacement,[],[f68,f138]) ).
tff(f68,axiom,
! [X38: $i,X37: $i] :
( p_LES_EQU_(f_ADD_(X37,n1),X38)
| ( X37 = X38 )
| ~ p_LES_EQU_(X37,X38) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_69) ).
tff(f212,plain,
p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n0),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f211,f134]) ).
tff(f134,axiom,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
tff(f211,plain,
( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f210,f136]) ).
tff(f136,axiom,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
tff(f210,plain,
! [X10: $i] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X10),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1))) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f209,f208]) ).
tff(f208,plain,
! [X10: $i] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X10),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1))) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f33,f13]) ).
tff(f13,axiom,
! [X6: $i] :
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X6,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X6)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_14) ).
tff(f33,axiom,
! [X10: $i] :
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X10),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_34) ).
tff(f209,plain,
! [X10: $i] :
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X10),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1))) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f45,f13]) ).
tff(f45,axiom,
! [X10: $i] :
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X10))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X10))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X10))
| p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X10),n0)
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd__error_(f_ADD_(X10,n1))) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_46) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.13 % Problem : HWV021-2 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.08/0.14 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35 % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 12:21:38 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.36 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.14/0.36 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/56Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17400)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/78Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17398)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/34Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17399)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/51Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Refutation not found, incomplete strategy% (17405)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Termination reason: Refutation not found, incomplete strategy
% 0.57/0.76
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Memory used [KB]: 1144
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Time elapsed: 0.002 s
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)Instructions burned: 3 (million)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (17405)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.76 % (17403)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/45Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17404)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2996ds/83Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17398)First to succeed.
% 0.57/0.76 % (17406)lrs+21_1:16_sil=2000:sp=occurrence:urr=on:flr=on:i=55:sd=1:nm=0:ins=3:ss=included:rawr=on:br=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/55Mi)
% 0.57/0.76 % (17403)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.57/0.76 % (17398)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/vampire-proof-17397"
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.57/0.77 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.57/0.77 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)------------------------------
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.57/0.77
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Memory used [KB]: 1187
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Time elapsed: 0.027 s
% 0.57/0.77 % (17398)Instructions burned: 7 (million)
% 0.57/0.77 % (17397)Success in time 0.413 s
% 0.57/0.77 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------