TSTP Solution File: HWV014-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:36:54 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.32s 0.66s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.32s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 4
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 20 ( 16 unt; 4 nHn; 18 RR)
% Number of literals : 36 ( 9 equ; 17 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 6 ( 4 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 6 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_71,axiom,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_71) ).
cnf(axiom_21,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/HWV003-0.ax',axiom_21) ).
cnf(quest_5,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_4,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_71]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| int_level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(int_level(X1),n1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(int_level(X1),n0) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
level(X1) = int_level(X1),
axiom_21 ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( level(plus(X1,n1)) = minus(level(X1),n1)
| p_Reset(X1)
| p_Wr(X1)
| ~ p_Rd(X1)
| ~ gt(level(X1),n0) ),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_9]),c_0_9]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,negated_conjecture,
gt(level(x_139),n0),
quest_1 ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
p_Rd(x_139),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != minus(level(x_139),n1),
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Wr(x_139),
c_0_11 ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_15])]),c_0_16]),c_0_17]),c_0_18]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.26 % Problem : HWV014-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.11/0.27 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.50 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.50 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.50 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.50 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.50 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.50 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.50 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.50 % DateTime : Sun May 19 11:47:08 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.50 % CPUTime :
% 0.23/0.63 Running first-order model finding
% 0.23/0.63 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.32/0.66 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.32/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 30677 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.32/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.66 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with pid 30685 completed with status 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Result found by G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.32/0.66 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.32/0.66 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.32/0.66 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.32/0.66 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Starting G-E--_207_C18_F1_SE_CS_SP_PI_PS_S5PRR_S2S with 151s (1) cores
% 0.32/0.66 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.32/0.66 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.32/0.66
% 0.32/0.66 # Proof found!
% 0.32/0.66 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.32/0.66 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.32/0.66 # Parsed axioms : 95
% 0.32/0.66 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Initial clauses : 95
% 0.32/0.66 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 1
% 0.32/0.66 # Initial clauses in saturation : 94
% 0.32/0.66 # Processed clauses : 148
% 0.32/0.66 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # ...subsumed : 1
% 0.32/0.66 # ...remaining for further processing : 147
% 0.32/0.66 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 5
% 0.32/0.66 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Backward-subsumed : 16
% 0.32/0.66 # Backward-rewritten : 1
% 0.32/0.66 # Generated clauses : 139
% 0.32/0.66 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 116
% 0.32/0.66 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 61
% 0.32/0.66 # Paramodulations : 131
% 0.32/0.66 # Factorizations : 2
% 0.32/0.66 # NegExts : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Equation resolutions : 6
% 0.32/0.66 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Total rewrite steps : 19
% 0.32/0.66 # ...of those cached : 17
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.32/0.66 # Current number of processed clauses : 51
% 0.32/0.66 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 4
% 0.32/0.66 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Negative unit clauses : 6
% 0.32/0.66 # Non-unit-clauses : 41
% 0.32/0.66 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 133
% 0.32/0.66 # ...number of literals in the above : 476
% 0.32/0.66 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Current number of archived clauses : 94
% 0.32/0.66 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 2078
% 0.32/0.66 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 375
% 0.32/0.66 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 78
% 0.32/0.66 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 5
% 0.32/0.66 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # BW rewrite match attempts : 1
% 0.32/0.66 # BW rewrite match successes : 1
% 0.32/0.66 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.32/0.66 # Termbank termtop insertions : 6768
% 0.32/0.66 # Search garbage collected termcells : 192
% 0.32/0.66
% 0.32/0.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.66 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.32/0.66 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.32/0.66 # Total time : 0.018 s
% 0.32/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 1828 pages
% 0.32/0.66
% 0.32/0.66 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.32/0.66 # User time : 0.059 s
% 0.32/0.66 # System time : 0.007 s
% 0.32/0.66 # Total time : 0.066 s
% 0.32/0.66 # Maximum resident set size: 1768 pages
% 0.32/0.66 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------