TSTP Solution File: HWV013-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : HWV013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:58:13 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.18s 0.50s
% Output : Refutation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 23 ( 15 unt; 3 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 34 ( 8 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 5 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 29 ( 15 ~; 14 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 4 ( 0 usr; 3 ari)
% Number of type conns : 6 ( 3 >; 3 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 9 ( 7 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
tff(pred_def_14,type,
sQ1_eqProxy: ( $int * $int ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_15,type,
sQ2_eqProxy: ( $rat * $rat ) > $o ).
tff(pred_def_16,type,
sQ3_eqProxy: ( $real * $real ) > $o ).
fof(f713,plain,
$false,
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f712,f134]) ).
fof(f134,plain,
gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139)),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f97]) ).
fof(f97,plain,
gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139)),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f92,f21]) ).
fof(f21,axiom,
! [X25] : level(X25) = int_level(X25),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_21) ).
fof(f92,axiom,
gt(fifo_length,level(x_139)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
fof(f712,plain,
~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139)),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f711,f110]) ).
fof(f110,plain,
~ p_Rd(x_139),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f93]) ).
fof(f93,axiom,
~ p_Rd(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_3) ).
fof(f711,plain,
( p_Rd(x_139)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139)) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f710,f175]) ).
fof(f175,plain,
int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) != plus(int_level(x_139),n1),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f96]) ).
fof(f96,plain,
int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) != plus(int_level(x_139),n1),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f95,f21,f21]) ).
fof(f95,axiom,
level(plus(x_139,n1)) != plus(level(x_139),n1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_5) ).
fof(f710,plain,
( int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = plus(int_level(x_139),n1)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139))
| p_Rd(x_139) ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f704,f115]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f91]) ).
fof(f91,axiom,
~ p_Reset(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
fof(f704,plain,
( p_Reset(x_139)
| int_level(plus(x_139,n1)) = plus(int_level(x_139),n1)
| p_Rd(x_139)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(x_139)) ),
inference(resolution,[],[f156,f125]) ).
fof(f125,plain,
p_Wr(x_139),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f94]) ).
fof(f94,axiom,
p_Wr(x_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_4) ).
fof(f156,plain,
! [X34] :
( ~ p_Wr(X34)
| p_Rd(X34)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X34))
| p_Reset(X34)
| int_level(plus(X34,n1)) = plus(int_level(X34),n1) ),
inference(literal_reordering,[],[f35]) ).
fof(f35,axiom,
! [X34] :
( p_Rd(X34)
| ~ gt(fifo_length,int_level(X34))
| int_level(plus(X34,n1)) = plus(int_level(X34),n1)
| p_Reset(X34)
| ~ p_Wr(X34) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_35) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : HWV013-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n001.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 23:18:00 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.46 % (28358)dis+21_1:1_av=off:er=filter:slsq=on:slsqc=0:slsqr=1,1:sp=frequency:to=lpo:i=498:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/498Mi)
% 0.18/0.46 % (28350)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (28340)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (28335)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:fmbsr=1.5:nm=4:skr=on:i=191324:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/191324Mi)
% 0.18/0.49 % (28350)First to succeed.
% 0.18/0.50 % (28339)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (28365)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=439:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/439Mi)
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.18/0.50 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.18/0.50 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.18/0.50
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Memory used [KB]: 6140
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Time elapsed: 0.020 s
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)Instructions burned: 30 (million)
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50 % (28350)------------------------------
% 0.18/0.50 % (28327)Success in time 0.159 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------