TSTP Solution File: HWV012-2 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : HWV012-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 08:04:41 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 5
% Number of leaves : 7
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 22 ( 11 unt; 3 nHn; 20 RR)
% Number of literals : 50 ( 2 equ; 30 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 4 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 10 ( 10 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 13 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(axiom_41,axiom,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',axiom_41) ).
cnf(axiom_13,axiom,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',axiom_13) ).
cnf(axiom_22,axiom,
( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',axiom_22) ).
cnf(quest_1,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',quest_1) ).
cnf(axiom_5,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',axiom_5) ).
cnf(quest_3,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',quest_3) ).
cnf(quest_2,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p',quest_2) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_41]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[axiom_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
( p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
c_0_7 ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1)) ),
c_0_8 ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quest_1]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTreset_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
c_0_9 ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTrd_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(t_206)),
c_0_12 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTlevel_(X1) = fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1),
axiom_5 ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
( p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(X1))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(X1,n1)))
| ~ p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(X1)) ),
inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]),c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr__error_(f_ADD_(t_206,n1))),
quest_3 ).
cnf(c_0_19,negated_conjecture,
p__pred_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTwr_(t_206)),
quest_2 ).
cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
~ p_LES_EQU_(fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTfifo__length_,fwork_DOTfifo_DOTrtl_DOTint__level_(t_206)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_19])]),c_0_20]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.12 % Problem : HWV012-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.13 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.14/0.34 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Fri May 3 17:49:23 EDT 2024
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.21/0.48 Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.dlxfAAI9Wj/E---3.1_11381.p
% 0.21/0.50 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # new_bool_3 with pid 11459 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 11462 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing class: FSLSSMSMSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting C07_19_nc_SOS_SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.21/0.50 # Search class: FGHSS-FFMS21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50 # Preprocessing time : 0.002 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50 # Parsed axioms : 136
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 103
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses : 33
% 0.21/0.50 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Initial clauses in saturation : 33
% 0.21/0.50 # Processed clauses : 63
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # ...subsumed : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # ...remaining for further processing : 61
% 0.21/0.50 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Backward-rewritten : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Generated clauses : 18
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 14
% 0.21/0.50 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 6
% 0.21/0.50 # Paramodulations : 17
% 0.21/0.50 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # NegExts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Equation resolutions : 1
% 0.21/0.50 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Total rewrite steps : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # ...of those cached : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of processed clauses : 28
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 5
% 0.21/0.50 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Negative unit clauses : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit-clauses : 16
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 14
% 0.21/0.50 # ...number of literals in the above : 54
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Current number of archived clauses : 33
% 0.21/0.50 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 83
% 0.21/0.50 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 44
% 0.21/0.50 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 8
% 0.21/0.50 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7
% 0.21/0.50 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match attempts : 3
% 0.21/0.50 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.21/0.50 # Termbank termtop insertions : 3052
% 0.21/0.50 # Search garbage collected termcells : 502
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1896 pages
% 0.21/0.50
% 0.21/0.50 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50 # User time : 0.009 s
% 0.21/0.50 # System time : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Total time : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.50 # Maximum resident set size: 1800 pages
% 0.21/0.50 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------