TSTP Solution File: HWV009-1 by Vampire---4.8
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Vampire---4.8
% Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:40:32 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.55s 0.74s
% Output : Refutation 0.55s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 6
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 25 ( 6 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 48 ( 7 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 45 ( 22 ~; 20 |; 0 &)
% ( 3 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 3 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 3 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 8 ( 6 usr; 4 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 4 ( 4 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f130,plain,
$false,
inference(avatar_sat_refutation,[],[f106,f116,f123,f129]) ).
fof(f129,plain,
~ spl0_2,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f128]) ).
fof(f128,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f124,f91]) ).
fof(f91,axiom,
p_Reset(t_139),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_1) ).
fof(f124,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(t_139)
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f101,f29]) ).
fof(f29,axiom,
! [X30] :
( ~ p_Wr_error(plus(X30,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X30) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_29) ).
fof(f101,plain,
( p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| ~ spl0_2 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f99]) ).
fof(f99,plain,
( spl0_2
<=> p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_2])]) ).
fof(f123,plain,
~ spl0_3,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f122]) ).
fof(f122,plain,
( $false
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f117,f91]) ).
fof(f117,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(t_139)
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(resolution,[],[f105,f30]) ).
fof(f30,axiom,
! [X30] :
( ~ p_Rd_error(plus(X30,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X30) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_30) ).
fof(f105,plain,
( p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| ~ spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f103]) ).
fof(f103,plain,
( spl0_3
<=> p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_3])]) ).
fof(f116,plain,
spl0_1,
inference(avatar_contradiction_clause,[],[f115]) ).
fof(f115,plain,
( $false
| spl0_1 ),
inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f114,f91]) ).
fof(f114,plain,
( ~ p_Reset(t_139)
| spl0_1 ),
inference(trivial_inequality_removal,[],[f107]) ).
fof(f107,plain,
( n0 != n0
| ~ p_Reset(t_139)
| spl0_1 ),
inference(superposition,[],[f97,f26]) ).
fof(f26,axiom,
! [X30] :
( n0 = int_level(plus(X30,n1))
| ~ p_Reset(X30) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_26) ).
fof(f97,plain,
( n0 != int_level(plus(t_139,n1))
| spl0_1 ),
inference(avatar_component_clause,[],[f95]) ).
fof(f95,plain,
( spl0_1
<=> n0 = int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
introduced(avatar_definition,[new_symbols(naming,[spl0_1])]) ).
fof(f106,plain,
( ~ spl0_1
| spl0_2
| spl0_3 ),
inference(avatar_split_clause,[],[f93,f103,f99,f95]) ).
fof(f93,plain,
( p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| n0 != int_level(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
inference(definition_unfolding,[],[f92,f21]) ).
fof(f21,axiom,
! [X25] : level(X25) = int_level(X25),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',axiom_21) ).
fof(f92,axiom,
( p_Rd_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| p_Wr_error(plus(t_139,n1))
| n0 != level(plus(t_139,n1)) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quest_2) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.09 % Problem : HWV009-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.00/0.10 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t %d %s
% 0.10/0.30 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.10/0.30 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.10/0.30 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.10/0.30 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.10/0.30 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.10/0.30 % DateTime : Sun May 19 12:25:23 EDT 2024
% 0.10/0.30 % CPUTime :
% 0.10/0.30 This is a CNF_UNS_RFO_SEQ_NHN problem
% 0.10/0.31 Running vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule file --schedule_file /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/quickGreedyProduceRating_steal_pow3.txt --cores 8 -m 12000 -t 300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.55/0.73 % (26902)lrs+1011_1:1_sil=8000:sp=occurrence:nwc=10.0:i=78:ss=axioms:sgt=8_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/78Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26901)lrs+1011_461:32768_sil=16000:irw=on:sp=frequency:lsd=20:fd=preordered:nwc=10.0:s2agt=32:alpa=false:cond=fast:s2a=on:i=51:s2at=3.0:awrs=decay:awrsf=691:bd=off:nm=20:fsr=off:amm=sco:uhcvi=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/51Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26900)dis-1011_2:1_sil=2000:lsd=20:nwc=5.0:flr=on:mep=off:st=3.0:i=34:sd=1:ep=RS:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26905)lrs+1002_1:16_to=lpo:sil=32000:sp=unary_frequency:sos=on:i=45:bd=off:ss=axioms_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/45Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26903)ott+1011_1:1_sil=2000:urr=on:i=33:sd=1:kws=inv_frequency:ss=axioms:sup=off_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/33Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26906)lrs+21_1:5_sil=2000:sos=on:urr=on:newcnf=on:slsq=on:i=83:slsql=off:bd=off:nm=2:ss=axioms:st=1.5:sp=const_min:gsp=on:rawr=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/83Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26904)lrs+2_1:1_sil=16000:fde=none:sos=all:nwc=5.0:i=34:ep=RS:s2pl=on:lma=on:afp=100000_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/34Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26907)lrs-21_1:1_to=lpo:sil=2000:sp=frequency:sos=on:lma=on:i=56:sd=2:ss=axioms:ep=R_0 on theBenchmark for (2995ds/56Mi)
% 0.55/0.73 % (26900)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.73 % (26905)First to succeed.
% 0.55/0.74 % (26903)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Solution written to "/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/vampire-proof-26898"
% 0.55/0.74 % (26902)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.74 % (26907)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.74 % (26906)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.55/0.74 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)------------------------------
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Version: Vampire 4.8 (commit 3a798227e on 2024-05-03 07:42:47 +0200)
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.55/0.74
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Memory used [KB]: 1129
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Time elapsed: 0.004 s
% 0.55/0.74 % (26905)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.55/0.74 % (26898)Success in time 0.424 s
% 0.55/0.74 % Vampire---4.8 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------