TSTP Solution File: HWC004-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : HWC004-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 21:34:56 EDT 2024
% Result : Satisfiable 0.18s 0.46s
% Output : Saturation 0.18s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : ERROR: Analysing output (Could not find formula named or_definition4)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
or(n1,n1) = n1,
or_definition4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
or(n1,n0) = n1,
or_definition3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
or(n0,n1) = n1,
or_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
or(n0,n0) = n0,
or_definition1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
and(n1,n1) = n1,
and_definition4,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
and(n1,n0) = n0,
and_definition3,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
and(n0,n1) = n0,
and_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
and(n0,n0) = n0,
and_definition1,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
not(n1) = n0,
not_definition2,
[final] ).
cnf(c_0_19,axiom,
not(n0) = n1,
not_definition1,
[final] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : HWC004-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.5.0.
% 0.06/0.12 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n015.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Sun May 19 00:13:23 EDT 2024
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.18/0.45 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.18/0.45 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.18/0.46 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 26768 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # partial match(2): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 26774 completed with status 1
% 0.18/0.46 # Result found by U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.18/0.46 # Search class: FUUPF-FFSM21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # partial match(2): FUUPM-FFSF21-SFFFFFNN
% 0.18/0.46 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.18/0.46 # Starting U----_102_C09_12_F1_SE_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 0.18/0.46 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # No proof found!
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS status Satisfiable
% 0.18/0.46 # SZS output start Saturation
% See solution above
% 0.18/0.46 # Parsed axioms : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Initial clauses in saturation : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Processed clauses : 20
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...remaining for further processing : 20
% 0.18/0.46 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Backward-rewritten : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Generated clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Paramodulations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # NegExts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Total rewrite steps : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...of those cached : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of processed clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 0
% 0.18/0.46 # ...number of literals in the above : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Current number of archived clauses : 10
% 0.18/0.46 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # BW rewrite match successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.18/0.46 # Termbank termtop insertions : 108
% 0.18/0.46 # Search garbage collected termcells : 0
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.000 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1560 pages
% 0.18/0.46
% 0.18/0.46 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.18/0.46 # User time : 0.010 s
% 0.18/0.46 # System time : 0.003 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.18/0.46 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.18/0.46 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.18/0.46 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------