TSTP Solution File: HEN008-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : HEN008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 08:02:43 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.20s 0.51s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.20s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   41 (  18 unt;   0 nHn;  36 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   89 (  10 equ;  52 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    4 (   2 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   6 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   82 (   3 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(quotient_property,axiom,
    ( less_equal(X7,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',quotient_property) ).

cnf(quotient_less_equal,axiom,
    ( quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',quotient_less_equal) ).

cnf(closure,axiom,
    quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',closure) ).

cnf(zero_is_smallest,axiom,
    less_equal(zero,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',zero_is_smallest) ).

cnf(aLEb,hypothesis,
    less_equal(a,b),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',aLEb) ).

cnf(less_equal_and_equal,axiom,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ less_equal(X2,X1) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',less_equal_and_equal) ).

cnf(less_equal_quotient,axiom,
    ( less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',less_equal_quotient) ).

cnf(bQc,hypothesis,
    quotient(b,c,bQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',bQc) ).

cnf(well_defined,axiom,
    ( X3 = X4
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',well_defined) ).

cnf(aQc,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,c,aQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',aQc) ).

cnf(prove_aQcLEbQc,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p',prove_aQcLEbQc) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    ( less_equal(X7,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_property]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    ( quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[quotient_less_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    ( less_equal(X7,X8)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X2,X4,X5)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X4,X6)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X7)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X4,X8) ),
    c_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    quotient(X1,X2,divide(X1,X2)),
    closure ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    ( quotient(X1,X2,zero)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
    less_equal(zero,X1),
    zero_is_smallest ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    ( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),X3)
    | ~ quotient(X4,X5,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X6,X5,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X7,X5,X1)
    | ~ quotient(X7,X6,X4) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    quotient(zero,X1,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    less_equal(a,b),
    aLEb ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ less_equal(X2,X1) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_equal_and_equal]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    ( less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[less_equal_quotient]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    ( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X4,zero)
    | ~ quotient(X4,X5,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X3,X5,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,b,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ less_equal(X2,X1) ),
    c_0_20 ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    ( less_equal(X1,X2)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,zero) ),
    c_0_21 ).

cnf(c_0_26,hypothesis,
    ( less_equal(divide(X1,X2),zero)
    | ~ quotient(b,X3,X2)
    | ~ quotient(a,X3,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,hypothesis,
    quotient(b,c,bQc),
    bQc ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    ( X3 = X4
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4) ),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[well_defined]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    ( X1 = X2
    | ~ quotient(X2,X1,zero)
    | ~ less_equal(X1,X2) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,hypothesis,
    ( less_equal(divide(X1,bQc),zero)
    | ~ quotient(a,c,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    ( X3 = X4
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ quotient(X1,X2,X4) ),
    c_0_28 ).

cnf(c_0_32,hypothesis,
    quotient(a,c,aQc),
    aQc ).

cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_aQcLEbQc]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,hypothesis,
    ( divide(X1,bQc) = zero
    | ~ quotient(a,c,X1) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_18])]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,hypothesis,
    ( X1 = aQc
    | ~ quotient(a,c,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,negated_conjecture,
    ~ less_equal(aQc,bQc),
    c_0_33 ).

cnf(c_0_37,hypothesis,
    ( quotient(X1,bQc,zero)
    | ~ quotient(a,c,X1) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_34]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,hypothesis,
    divide(a,c) = aQc,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_35,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,negated_conjecture,
    ~ quotient(aQc,bQc,zero),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_25]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,hypothesis,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_14]),c_0_38]),c_0_39]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem    : HEN008-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 08:31:02 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.20/0.48  Running first-order model finding
% 0.20/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.XiBklrpNCs/E---3.1_24277.p
% 0.20/0.51  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24407 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 24412 completed with status 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.20/0.51  # Search class: FHUSS-FFSS22-SFFFFFNN
% 0.20/0.51  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 811s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.20/0.51  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # Proof found!
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.20/0.51  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.20/0.51  # Parsed axioms                        : 13
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses                      : 13
% 0.20/0.51  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 13
% 0.20/0.51  # Processed clauses                    : 174
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of these trivial                  : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # ...subsumed                          : 62
% 0.20/0.51  # ...remaining for further processing  : 111
% 0.20/0.51  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-subsumed                    : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Backward-rewritten                   : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Generated clauses                    : 334
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 211
% 0.20/0.51  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Paramodulations                      : 334
% 0.20/0.51  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Total rewrite steps                  : 158
% 0.20/0.51  # ...of those cached                   : 102
% 0.20/0.51  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of processed clauses  : 96
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 25
% 0.20/0.51  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.20/0.51  #    Negative unit clauses             : 2
% 0.20/0.51  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 69
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 61
% 0.20/0.51  # ...number of literals in the above   : 192
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 0.20/0.51  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 1295
% 0.20/0.51  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1107
% 0.20/0.51  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 63
% 0.20/0.51  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 9
% 0.20/0.51  # BW rewrite match successes           : 1
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.20/0.51  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 4072
% 0.20/0.51  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 30
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.000 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.014 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1640 pages
% 0.20/0.51  
% 0.20/0.51  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.20/0.51  # User time                : 0.056 s
% 0.20/0.51  # System time              : 0.008 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Total time               : 0.064 s
% 0.20/0.51  # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.20/0.51  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------