TSTP Solution File: HEN007-6 by SPASS---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SPASS---3.9
% Problem  : HEN007-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp
% Command  : run_spass %d %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 13:03:07 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 14.12s 14.35s
% Output   : Refutation 14.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : HEN007-6 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.13  % Command  : run_spass %d %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 14:48:53 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 14.12/14.35  
% 14.12/14.35  SPASS V 3.9 
% 14.12/14.35  SPASS beiseite: Proof found.
% 14.12/14.35  % SZS status Theorem
% 14.12/14.35  Problem: /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 
% 14.12/14.35  SPASS derived 26504 clauses, backtracked 0 clauses, performed 0 splits and kept 5863 clauses.
% 14.12/14.35  SPASS allocated 86698 KBytes.
% 14.12/14.35  SPASS spent	0:0:13.47 on the problem.
% 14.12/14.35  		0:00:00.04 for the input.
% 14.12/14.35  		0:00:00.00 for the FLOTTER CNF translation.
% 14.12/14.35  		0:00:00.35 for inferences.
% 14.12/14.35  		0:00:00.00 for the backtracking.
% 14.12/14.35  		0:0:13.02 for the reduction.
% 14.12/14.35  
% 14.12/14.35  
% 14.12/14.35  Here is a proof with depth 7, length 26 :
% 14.12/14.35  % SZS output start Refutation
% 14.12/14.35  4[0:Inp] ||  -> quotient(u,zero,u)*.
% 14.12/14.35  5[0:Inp] || less_equal(u,v)* less_equal(v,w)* -> less_equal(u,w)*.
% 14.12/14.35  6[0:Inp] ||  -> less_equal(x__dfg,y__dfg)*r.
% 14.12/14.35  7[0:Inp] ||  -> quotient(z__dfg,y__dfg,zQy)*.
% 14.12/14.35  8[0:Inp] ||  -> quotient(z__dfg,x__dfg,zQx)*.
% 14.12/14.35  9[0:Inp] || less_equal(zQy,zQx)*r -> .
% 14.12/14.35  10[0:Inp] || less_equal(u,v) -> quotient(u,v,zero)*.
% 14.12/14.35  12[0:Inp] || quotient(u,v,w)* -> less_equal(w,u).
% 14.12/14.35  13[0:Inp] || quotient(u,v,w)*+ quotient(x,y,z)* quotient(x1,v,x)* quotient(x2,v,y)* quotient(x1,x2,u)* -> less_equal(z,w)*.
% 14.12/14.35  17[0:Inp] ||  -> quotient(u,v,divide(u,v))*.
% 14.12/14.35  18[0:Inp] || quotient(u,v,w)*+ quotient(u,v,x)* -> equal(x,w)*.
% 14.12/14.35  40[0:Res:17.0,12.0] ||  -> less_equal(divide(u,v),u)*l.
% 14.12/14.35  51[0:Res:4.0,18.0] || quotient(u,zero,v)* -> equal(v,u).
% 14.12/14.35  52[0:Res:17.0,18.0] || quotient(u,v,w)* -> equal(w,divide(u,v)).
% 14.12/14.35  107[0:Res:17.0,13.0] || quotient(u,v,w)*+ quotient(x,y,u)* quotient(z,y,v)* quotient(x,z,x1)* -> less_equal(w,divide(x1,y))*.
% 14.12/14.35  122[0:Res:17.0,51.0] ||  -> equal(divide(u,zero),u)**.
% 14.12/14.35  153[0:Res:10.1,52.0] || less_equal(u,v) -> equal(divide(u,v),zero)**.
% 14.12/14.35  880[0:Res:17.0,107.0] || quotient(u,v,w)*+ quotient(x,v,y)* quotient(u,x,z)* -> less_equal(divide(w,y),divide(z,v))*.
% 14.12/14.35  3105[0:Res:7.0,880.0] || quotient(u,y__dfg,v)*+ quotient(z__dfg,u,w)* -> less_equal(divide(zQy,v),divide(w,y__dfg))*.
% 14.12/14.35  9287[0:Res:17.0,3105.0] || quotient(z__dfg,u,v)*+ -> less_equal(divide(zQy,divide(u,y__dfg)),divide(v,y__dfg))*.
% 14.12/14.35  33972[0:Res:8.0,9287.0] ||  -> less_equal(divide(zQy,divide(x__dfg,y__dfg)),divide(zQx,y__dfg))*l.
% 14.12/14.35  35384[0:SpR:153.1,33972.0] || less_equal(x__dfg,y__dfg) -> less_equal(divide(zQy,zero),divide(zQx,y__dfg))*r.
% 14.12/14.35  35551[0:Rew:122.0,35384.1] || less_equal(x__dfg,y__dfg) -> less_equal(zQy,divide(zQx,y__dfg))*r.
% 14.12/14.35  35552[0:MRR:35551.0,6.0] ||  -> less_equal(zQy,divide(zQx,y__dfg))*r.
% 14.12/14.35  35720[0:OCh:5.1,5.0,35552.0,40.0] ||  -> less_equal(zQy,zQx)*r.
% 14.12/14.35  35835[0:MRR:35720.0,9.0] ||  -> .
% 14.12/14.35  % SZS output end Refutation
% 14.12/14.35  Formulae used in the proof : x_divde_zero_is_x transitivity_of_less_equal xLEy zQy zQx prove_zQyLEzQx quotient_less_equal divisor_existence quotient_property closure well_defined
% 14.12/14.35  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------