TSTP Solution File: HEN004-5 by Bliksem---1.12

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Bliksem---1.12
% Problem  : HEN004-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : bliksem %s

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 0s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 12:47:02 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.71s 1.09s
% Output   : Refutation 0.71s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : HEN004-5 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : bliksem %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Fri Jul  1 13:55:38 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for termspace/termends
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for clauses
% 0.71/1.09  *** allocated 10000 integers for justifications
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksem 1.12
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Automatic Strategy Selection
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Clauses:
% 0.71/1.09  [
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( divide( divide( X, Y ), X ), zero ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( divide( divide( divide( X, Y ), divide( Z, Y ) ), divide( divide( X
% 0.71/1.09    , Z ), Y ) ), zero ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( divide( zero, X ), zero ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ ~( =( divide( X, Y ), zero ) ), ~( =( divide( Y, X ), zero ) ), =( X, 
% 0.71/1.09    Y ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( divide( X, identity ), zero ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ =( divide( X, X ), zero ) ],
% 0.71/1.09     [ ~( =( divide( a, zero ), a ) ) ]
% 0.71/1.09  ] .
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  percentage equality = 1.000000, percentage horn = 1.000000
% 0.71/1.09  This is a pure equality problem
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Options Used:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  useres =            1
% 0.71/1.09  useparamod =        1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqrefl =         1
% 0.71/1.09  useeqfact =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usefactor =         1
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpsplitting =  0
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpdemod =      5
% 0.71/1.09  usesimpres =        3
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  resimpinuse      =  1000
% 0.71/1.09  resimpclauses =     20000
% 0.71/1.09  substype =          eqrewr
% 0.71/1.09  backwardsubs =      1
% 0.71/1.09  selectoldest =      5
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [0] =  split
% 0.71/1.09  litorderings [1] =  extend the termordering, first sorting on arguments
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  termordering =      kbo
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litapriori =        0
% 0.71/1.09  termapriori =       1
% 0.71/1.09  litaposteriori =    0
% 0.71/1.09  termaposteriori =   0
% 0.71/1.09  demodaposteriori =  0
% 0.71/1.09  ordereqreflfact =   0
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  litselect =         negord
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxweight =         15
% 0.71/1.09  maxdepth =          30000
% 0.71/1.09  maxlength =         115
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrvars =         195
% 0.71/1.09  excuselevel =       1
% 0.71/1.09  increasemaxweight = 1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  maxselected =       10000000
% 0.71/1.09  maxnrclauses =      10000000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  showgenerated =    0
% 0.71/1.09  showkept =         0
% 0.71/1.09  showselected =     0
% 0.71/1.09  showdeleted =      0
% 0.71/1.09  showresimp =       1
% 0.71/1.09  showstatus =       2000
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  prologoutput =     1
% 0.71/1.09  nrgoals =          5000000
% 0.71/1.09  totalproof =       1
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Symbols occurring in the translation:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  {}  [0, 0]      (w:1, o:2, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  .  [1, 2]      (w:1, o:20, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  !  [4, 1]      (w:0, o:15, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  =  [13, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  ==>  [14, 2]      (w:1, o:0, a:0, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  divide  [41, 2]      (w:1, o:45, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  zero  [42, 0]      (w:1, o:11, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  identity  [44, 0]      (w:1, o:13, a:1, s:1, b:0), 
% 0.71/1.09  a  [45, 0]      (w:1, o:14, a:1, s:1, b:0).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Starting Search:
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  Bliksems!, er is een bewijs:
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 0, [ =( divide( divide( X, Y ), X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 1, [ =( divide( divide( divide( X, Y ), divide( Z, Y ) ), divide( 
% 0.71/1.09    divide( X, Z ), Y ) ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 2, [ =( divide( zero, X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 3, [ ~( =( divide( X, Y ), zero ) ), ~( =( divide( Y, X ), zero ) )
% 0.71/1.09    , =( X, Y ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 5, [ =( divide( X, X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 6, [ ~( =( divide( a, zero ), a ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 12, [ =( divide( divide( divide( Y, X ), zero ), divide( divide( Y
% 0.71/1.09    , zero ), X ) ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 21, [ ~( =( divide( X, zero ), zero ) ), =( zero, X ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 30, [ ~( =( X, a ) ), ~( =( divide( divide( a, zero ), X ), zero )
% 0.71/1.09     ), ~( =( divide( X, divide( a, zero ) ), zero ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 35, [ ~( =( divide( a, divide( a, zero ) ), zero ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 38, [ =( zero, X ), ~( =( divide( divide( X, zero ), zero ), zero )
% 0.71/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 40, [ ~( =( divide( divide( a, divide( a, zero ) ), zero ), zero )
% 0.71/1.09     ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 151, [ =( divide( divide( divide( X, divide( X, zero ) ), zero ), 
% 0.71/1.09    zero ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 162, [] )
% 0.71/1.09  .
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.71/1.09  found a proof!
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  % ABCDEFGHIJKLMNOPQRSTUVWXYZ
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  initialclauses(
% 0.71/1.09  [ clause( 164, [ =( divide( divide( X, Y ), X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 165, [ =( divide( divide( divide( X, Y ), divide( Z, Y ) ), 
% 0.71/1.09    divide( divide( X, Z ), Y ) ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 166, [ =( divide( zero, X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 167, [ ~( =( divide( X, Y ), zero ) ), ~( =( divide( Y, X ), zero
% 0.71/1.09     ) ), =( X, Y ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 168, [ =( divide( X, identity ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 169, [ =( divide( X, X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 170, [ ~( =( divide( a, zero ), a ) ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  ] ).
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  
% 0.71/1.09  subsumption(
% 0.71/1.09  clause( 0, [ =( divide( divide( X, Y ), X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , clause( 164, [ =( divide( divide( X, Y ), X ), zero ) ] )
% 0.71/1.09  , substitution( 0, [ :=( X, X ), :=( Y, Y )] ), permutation( 0, [ ==>Cputime limit exceeded (core dumped)
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------