TSTP Solution File: HEN001-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem : HEN001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:24:31 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 1.53s 0.58s
% Output : Refutation 1.53s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 2
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 5 ( 4 unt; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 6 ( 0 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 4 ( 3 ~; 1 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of predicates : 3 ( 2 usr; 1 prp; 0-3 aty)
% Number of functors : 3 ( 3 usr; 3 con; 0-0 aty)
% Number of variables : 3 ( 3 !; 0 ?)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f12,plain,
$false,
inference(resolution,[],[f11,f7]) ).
fof(f7,axiom,
! [X0] : less_equal(X0,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity_is_largest) ).
fof(f11,plain,
~ less_equal(x,identity),
inference(resolution,[],[f1,f10]) ).
fof(f10,axiom,
~ quotient(x,identity,zero),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_everything_divide_identity_is_zero) ).
fof(f1,axiom,
! [X0,X1] :
( quotient(X0,X1,zero)
| ~ less_equal(X0,X1) ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',quotient_less_equal) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.12 % Problem : HEN001-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v1.0.0.
% 0.04/0.13 % Command : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.13/0.34 % Computer : n027.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 29 23:09:00 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 1.53/0.57 % (8212)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 1.53/0.57 % (8201)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [1]
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [1]
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [2]
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [2]
% 1.53/0.57 % (8214)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:rp=on:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=100:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/100Mi)
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [3]
% 1.53/0.57 TRYING [3]
% 1.53/0.57 % (8204)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.53/0.57 % (8204)First to succeed.
% 1.53/0.58 % (8199)ott+33_1:4_s2a=on:tgt=ground:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 1.53/0.58 % (8218)ott+11_1:1_drc=off:nwc=5.0:slsq=on:slsqc=1:spb=goal_then_units:to=lpo:i=467:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/467Mi)
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 1.53/0.58 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 1.53/0.58 % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)------------------------------
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Termination reason: Refutation
% 1.53/0.58
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Time elapsed: 0.153 s
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)Instructions burned: 2 (million)
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)------------------------------
% 1.53/0.58 % (8204)------------------------------
% 1.53/0.58 % (8194)Success in time 0.237 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------