TSTP Solution File: GRP782+1 by SOS---2.0
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : SOS---2.0
% Problem : GRP782+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : sos-script %s
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:44:29 EDT 2022
% Result : Unknown 0.90s 1.13s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----No solution output by system
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.14 % Problem : GRP782+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v7.5.0.
% 0.04/0.14 % Command : sos-script %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 06:10:58 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 0.22/0.39 ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.22/0.39 The process was started by sandbox on n018.cluster.edu,
% 0.22/0.39 Tue Jun 14 06:10:58 2022
% 0.22/0.39 The command was "./sos". The process ID is 6887.
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.22/0.39 set(auto).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.22/0.39 clear(print_given).
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 formula_list(usable).
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.22/0.39 strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.22/0.39 dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 ------------> process usable:
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 ------------> process sos:
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 46 during input processing: 0 [copy,46,flip.1] {-} b(A,m(i2(B,b(C,m(i2(D,E),C))),A))=b(C,m(i2(D,b(A,m(i2(B,E),A))),C)).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 80 during input processing: 0 [copy,80,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 50 during input processing: 0 [copy,83,flip.1] {-} i2(A,i2(B,i1(C,j2(D,E))))=i1(C,j2(D,i2(A,i2(B,E)))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 61 during input processing: 0 [copy,84,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,b(E,m(F,E))),C)))=i2(D,b(E,m(r(A,B,b(C,m(F,C))),E))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 63 during input processing: 0 [copy,85,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,l(D,E,b(F,m(G,F)))))=l(D,E,b(F,m(r(A,B,i2(C,G)),F))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 65 during input processing: 0 [copy,86,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,b(C,m(l(D,E,i2(F,G)),C)))=l(D,E,i2(F,r(A,B,b(C,m(G,C))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 67 during input processing: 0 [copy,87,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,r(E,F,i2(G,H))),C)))=r(E,F,i2(G,r(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,H),C))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 69 during input processing: 0 [copy,88,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,r(E,F,j2(G,H))),C)))=r(E,F,j2(G,l(A,B,b(C,m(i2(D,H),C))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 71 during input processing: 0 [copy,89,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,i2(C,j2(D,r(E,F,b(G,m(H,G))))))=r(E,F,b(G,m(r(A,B,i2(C,j2(D,H))),G))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 72 during input processing: 0 [copy,90,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,j2(C,i1(D,l(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=l(E,F,i1(G,r(A,B,j2(C,i1(D,H))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 73 during input processing: 0 [copy,91,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i1(C,i1(D,r(E,F,i2(G,H)))))=r(E,F,i2(G,l(A,B,i1(C,i1(D,H))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 74 during input processing: 0 [copy,92,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,j2(C,i2(D,l(E,F,i2(G,H)))))=l(E,F,i2(G,r(A,B,j2(C,i2(D,H))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 76 during input processing: 0 [copy,93,flip.1] {-} r(A,B,b(C,m(j2(D,l(E,F,i2(G,H))),C)))=l(E,F,i2(G,r(A,B,b(C,m(j2(D,H),C))))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 78 during input processing: 0 [copy,94,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,l(C,D,i2(E,i2(F,b(G,m(H,G))))))=l(C,D,b(G,m(l(A,B,i2(E,i2(F,H))),G))).
% 0.22/0.39 Following clause subsumed by 79 during input processing: 0 [copy,95,flip.1] {-} l(A,B,i2(C,i1(D,r(E,F,i1(G,H)))))=r(E,F,i1(G,l(A,B,i2(C,i1(D,H))))).
% 0.22/0.39
% 0.22/0.39 ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.22/0.43 SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.22/0.43 SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.22/0.43 number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.22/0.43 number of clauses initially in problem: 71
% 0.22/0.43 percentage of clauses intially in UL: 1
% 0.22/0.43 percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 58
% 0.22/0.43 percent of all initial clauses that are short: 98
% 0.22/0.43 absolute distinct symbol count: 17
% 0.22/0.43 distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.22/0.43 distinct function count: 11
% 0.22/0.43 distinct constant count: 5
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.22/0.43
% 0.22/0.43 =========== start of search ===========
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Changing weight limit from 60 to 73.
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Model 5 [ 5 1 2894 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.36/0.55 Resetting weight limit to 73 after 5 givens.
% 0.36/0.55
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 6 [ 2 0 2722 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 7 [ 13 1 575 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 8 [ 6 1 843 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 9 [ 8 1 1300 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 10 [ 7 0 751 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 11 [ 14 0 3319 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 12 [ 16 0 2356 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 13 [ 11 0 2211 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13 m(b(A,B),b(b(A,e),e))=i2(A,B).
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 ------------- memory usage ------------
% 0.90/1.13 24 mallocs of 32700 bytes each, 766.4 K.
% 0.90/1.13 type (bytes each) gets frees in use avail bytes
% 0.90/1.13 sym_ent ( 304) 137 0 137 0 40.7 K
% 0.90/1.13 term ( 32) 11512 10009 1503 46 48.4 K
% 0.90/1.13 rel ( 40) 10475 7909 2566 41 101.8 K
% 0.90/1.13 term_ptr ( 16) 15820 2163 13657 0 213.4 K
% 0.90/1.13 formula_ptr_2 ( 56) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 fpa_head ( 24) 3902 503 3399 0 79.7 K
% 0.90/1.13 fpa_tree ( 56) 302 302 0 13 0.7 K
% 0.90/1.13 context (1288) 680 680 0 4 5.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 trail ( 24) 892 892 0 6 0.1 K
% 0.90/1.13 imd_tree ( 32) 366 77 289 0 9.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 imd_pos (4024) 1662 1662 0 7 27.5 K
% 0.90/1.13 is_tree ( 24) 2241 680 1561 0 36.6 K
% 0.90/1.13 is_pos (2424) 663 663 0 18 42.6 K
% 0.90/1.13 fsub_pos ( 16) 72 72 0 1 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 literal ( 32) 246 72 174 0 5.4 K
% 0.90/1.13 clause ( 88) 246 72 174 0 15.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 list ( 272) 47 40 7 2 2.4 K
% 0.90/1.13 clash_nd ( 80) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 clause_ptr ( 16) 277 117 160 3 2.5 K
% 0.90/1.13 int_ptr ( 16) 1285 661 624 0 9.8 K
% 0.90/1.13 ci_ptr ( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 link_node ( 120) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 ans_lit_node( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 formula_box( 168) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13 formula( 40) 213 213 0 209 8.2 K
% 0.90/1.13 formula_ptr( 16) 37 37 0 37 0.6 K
% 0.90/1.13 cl_attribute( 24) 0 0 0 0 0.0 K
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
% 0.90/1.13 _into time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 para_from time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 pre_process time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 renumber time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 order equalities 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 unit deleletion 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 factor simplify 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 weigh cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 hints keep time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 sort lits time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 forward subsume 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 delete cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 keep cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 hints time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 print_cl time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 conflict time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 new demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 post_process time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 back demod time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 back subsume 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 factor time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 FINDER time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13 unindex time 0.00
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 true clauses given 1 (7.1%)
% 0.90/1.13 false clauses given 13
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 FALSE TRUE
% 0.90/1.13 7 0 1
% 0.90/1.13 11 1 0
% 0.90/1.13 13 2 0
% 0.90/1.13 14 2 0
% 0.90/1.13 17 2 0
% 0.90/1.13 19 3 0
% 0.90/1.13 21 1 0
% 0.90/1.13 23 3 0
% 0.90/1.13 27 13 0
% 0.90/1.13 29 2 0
% 0.90/1.13 31 10 0
% 0.90/1.13 73 1 0
% 0.90/1.13 tot: 40 1 (2.4% true)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Model 13 [ 11 0 2211 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 Forward subsumption counts, subsumer:number_subsumed.
% 0.90/1.13 1:0 2:0 3:0 4:0 5:0 6:0 7:0 8:0 9:0 10:0
% 0.90/1.13 11:0 12:0 13:0 14:0 15:0 16:0 17:0 18:0 19:0 20:0
% 0.90/1.13 21:0 22:0 23:0 24:0 25:0 26:0 27:0 28:0 29:0 30:0
% 0.90/1.13 31:0 32:0 33:0 34:0 35:0 36:0 37:0 38:0 39:0 40:0
% 0.90/1.13 41:0 42:0 43:0 44:0 45:0 46:1 47:0 48:0 49:0 50:1
% 0.90/1.13 51:0 52:0 53:0 54:0 55:0 56:0 57:0 58:0 59:0 60:0
% 0.90/1.13 61:1 62:0 63:1 64:0 65:1 66:0 67:1 68:0 69:1 70:0
% 0.90/1.13 71:1 72:1 73:1 74:1 75:0 76:1 77:0 78:1 79:1 80:58
% 0.90/1.13 81:0 82:0 83:0 84:0 85:0 86:0 87:0 88:0 89:0 90:0
% 0.90/1.13 91:0 92:0 93:0 94:0 95:0 96:0 97:0 98:0 99:0
% 0.90/1.13 All others: 0.
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 ********** ABNORMAL END **********
% 0.90/1.13
% 0.90/1.13 ********** is_delete, can't find end.
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------