TSTP Solution File: GRP766-1 by Twee---2.4.2

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem  : GRP766-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:20:02 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 25.32s 3.65s
% Output   : Proof 25.32s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem  : GRP766-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.1.0.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 23:20:47 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 25.32/3.65  Command-line arguments: --set-join --lhs-weight 1 --no-flatten-goal --complete-subsets --goal-heuristic
% 25.32/3.65  
% 25.32/3.65  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 25.32/3.65  
% 25.32/3.66  % SZS output start Proof
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 1 (sos04): difference(X, product(X, Y)) = Y.
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 2 (sos18): t(X, Y) = quotient(product(X, Y), X).
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 3 (sos05): quotient(product(X, Y), Y) = X.
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 4 (sos03): product(X, difference(X, Y)) = Y.
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 5 (sos06): product(quotient(X, Y), Y) = X.
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 6 (sos07): difference(X, product(product(X, Y), Z)) = quotient(product(Y, product(Z, X)), X).
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 7 (sos13): l(X, Y, Z) = difference(product(X, Y), product(X, product(Y, Z))).
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 8 (sos08): difference(product(X, Y), product(X, product(Y, Z))) = quotient(quotient(product(Z, product(X, Y)), Y), X).
% 25.32/3.66  Axiom 9 (sos19): t(eta(X), product(Y, Z)) = product(t(eta(X), Y), t(eta(X), Z)).
% 25.32/3.66  
% 25.32/3.66  Lemma 10: t(eta(X), product(Y, eta(X))) = product(eta(X), Y).
% 25.32/3.66  Proof:
% 25.32/3.66    t(eta(X), product(Y, eta(X)))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 9 (sos19) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(t(eta(X), Y), t(eta(X), eta(X)))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 2 (sos18) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(t(eta(X), Y), quotient(product(eta(X), eta(X)), eta(X)))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 3 (sos05) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(t(eta(X), Y), eta(X))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 2 (sos18) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(quotient(product(eta(X), Y), eta(X)), eta(X))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 5 (sos06) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(X), Y)
% 25.32/3.66  
% 25.32/3.66  Lemma 11: product(product(X, Y), l(X, Y, Z)) = product(X, product(Y, Z)).
% 25.32/3.66  Proof:
% 25.32/3.66    product(product(X, Y), l(X, Y, Z))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 7 (sos13) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(product(X, Y), difference(product(X, Y), product(X, product(Y, Z))))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 4 (sos03) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(X, product(Y, Z))
% 25.32/3.66  
% 25.32/3.66  Lemma 12: product(difference(X, product(product(X, Y), Z)), X) = product(Y, product(Z, X)).
% 25.32/3.66  Proof:
% 25.32/3.66    product(difference(X, product(product(X, Y), Z)), X)
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 6 (sos07) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(quotient(product(Y, product(Z, X)), X), X)
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 5 (sos06) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(Y, product(Z, X))
% 25.32/3.66  
% 25.32/3.66  Goal 1 (goals): product(eta(x0), product(x1, x2)) = product(product(eta(x0), x1), x2).
% 25.32/3.66  Proof:
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(x1, x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 1 (sos04) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(product(x2, eta(x0)), x1)), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 4 (sos03) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0)))), x1)), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 4 (sos03) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0)))), x1)))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 10 R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), t(eta(x0), product(difference(eta(x0), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0)))), x1)), eta(x0)))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 12 }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), t(eta(x0), product(difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0))), product(x1, eta(x0))))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 9 (sos19) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0)))), t(eta(x0), product(x1, eta(x0))))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 10 }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(x2, eta(x0)))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 4 (sos03) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)), eta(x0)))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 5 (sos06) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), product(quotient(difference(eta(x0), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)), eta(x0))), eta(x0)), eta(x0))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 6 (sos07) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), product(quotient(quotient(product(difference(eta(x0), x2), product(eta(x0), eta(x0))), eta(x0)), eta(x0)), eta(x0))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 8 (sos08) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), product(difference(product(eta(x0), eta(x0)), product(eta(x0), product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)))), eta(x0))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 7 (sos13) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(t(eta(x0), product(l(eta(x0), eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)), eta(x0))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 2 (sos18) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(quotient(product(eta(x0), product(l(eta(x0), eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)), eta(x0))), eta(x0)), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 6 (sos07) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(difference(eta(x0), product(product(eta(x0), eta(x0)), l(eta(x0), eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 11 }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(difference(eta(x0), product(eta(x0), product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)))), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 1 (sos04) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(product(eta(x0), difference(eta(x0), x2)), product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 4 (sos03) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(difference(product(x2, eta(x0)), product(x2, product(eta(x0), x1))), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 7 (sos13) R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(eta(x0), product(l(x2, eta(x0), x1), x2))
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 12 R->L }
% 25.32/3.66    product(difference(x2, product(product(x2, eta(x0)), l(x2, eta(x0), x1))), x2)
% 25.32/3.66  = { by lemma 11 }
% 25.32/3.66    product(difference(x2, product(x2, product(eta(x0), x1))), x2)
% 25.32/3.66  = { by axiom 1 (sos04) }
% 25.32/3.66    product(product(eta(x0), x1), x2)
% 25.32/3.66  % SZS output end Proof
% 25.32/3.66  
% 25.32/3.66  RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------