TSTP Solution File: GRP751-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : GRP751-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:54:21 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.14s 0.62s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 1.14s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   12
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   28 (  28 unt;   0 nHn;   4 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   28 (  27 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   70 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f07,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X3),mult(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p',f07) ).

cnf(f03,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p',f03) ).

cnf(f04,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p',f04) ).

cnf(f05,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X1)),mult(X2,X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(mult(X1,X1),X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p',f05) ).

cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
    mult(a,mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(rd(a,a),b),mult(a,c)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p',goals) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X3),mult(X2,X3)),
    f07 ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    mult(rd(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f03 ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
    f04 ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    mult(mult(rd(X1,X2),X3),mult(X2,X2)) = mult(X1,mult(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),mult(X3,X3)) = mult(rd(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X3)) = mult(rd(X1,X3),rd(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    mult(rd(rd(X1,X2),X3),rd(X2,X3)) = rd(X1,mult(X3,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    mult(mult(rd(X1,X2),X3),mult(X2,X3)) = mult(X1,mult(X3,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    rd(rd(X1,mult(X2,X2)),rd(X3,X2)) = rd(rd(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X1)),mult(X2,X3)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(mult(X1,X1),X3)),
    f05 ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),mult(X3,X2)) = mult(rd(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    rd(rd(X1,mult(X2,X2)),X3) = rd(rd(X1,mult(X3,X2)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    rd(mult(mult(X1,mult(X1,X1)),mult(X2,X3)),mult(mult(X1,X1),X3)) = mult(X1,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X2)),X3) = mult(rd(X1,rd(X3,X2)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    mult(rd(X1,rd(X2,X1)),rd(X3,X1)) = rd(mult(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_9]),c_0_18]),c_0_10]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    mult(rd(mult(rd(X1,X2),X3),rd(X4,X2)),X2) = rd(mult(X1,mult(X3,X2)),X4),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),X3) = mult(rd(X1,rd(X3,X1)),X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    rd(mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),mult(X4,X3)) = mult(rd(mult(rd(X1,X3),X2),X4),X3),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,negated_conjecture,
    mult(a,mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(rd(a,a),b),mult(a,c)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    mult(rd(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),X3),X1) = mult(rd(X1,X3),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]),c_0_7]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,negated_conjecture,
    mult(a,mult(b,c)) != mult(mult(rd(a,a),b),mult(a,c)),
    c_0_23 ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    mult(mult(rd(X1,X1),X2),mult(X1,X3)) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_24]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_26])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem    : GRP751-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.13  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n017.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.34  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 15:57:37 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.47  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.47  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.C43BB1HgxP/E---3.1_11873.p
% 1.14/0.62  # Version: 3.1.0
% 1.14/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.14/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # new_bool_3 with pid 11953 completed with status 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Result found by new_bool_3
% 1.14/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.14/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.14/0.62  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 1.14/0.62  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with pid 11958 completed with status 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Result found by G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y
% 1.14/0.62  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 1.14/0.62  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 1.14/0.62  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 1.14/0.62  # Scheduled 9 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 1.14/0.62  # Starting G-E--_107_C37_F1_PI_AE_Q4_CS_SP_PS_S0Y with 82s (1) cores
% 1.14/0.62  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 1.14/0.62  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 1.14/0.62  
% 1.14/0.62  # Proof found!
% 1.14/0.62  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 1.14/0.62  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 1.14/0.62  # Parsed axioms                        : 8
% 1.14/0.62  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 2
% 1.14/0.62  # Initial clauses                      : 6
% 1.14/0.62  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 6
% 1.14/0.62  # Processed clauses                    : 154
% 1.14/0.62  # ...of these trivial                  : 9
% 1.14/0.62  # ...subsumed                          : 69
% 1.14/0.62  # ...remaining for further processing  : 76
% 1.14/0.62  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 1.14/0.62  # Generated clauses                    : 11696
% 1.14/0.62  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 10896
% 1.14/0.62  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Paramodulations                      : 11696
% 1.14/0.62  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # NegExts                              : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Total rewrite steps                  : 4603
% 1.14/0.62  # ...of those cached                   : 2916
% 1.14/0.62  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 1.14/0.62  # Current number of processed clauses  : 61
% 1.14/0.62  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 41
% 1.14/0.62  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 20
% 1.14/0.62  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 1.14/0.62  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 10738
% 1.14/0.62  # ...number of literals in the above   : 10738
% 1.14/0.62  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Current number of archived clauses   : 15
% 1.14/0.62  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 73
% 1.14/0.62  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 210
% 1.14/0.62  # BW rewrite match successes           : 13
% 1.14/0.62  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 1.14/0.62  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 220731
% 1.14/0.62  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 7
% 1.14/0.62  
% 1.14/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.14/0.62  # User time                : 0.127 s
% 1.14/0.62  # System time              : 0.015 s
% 1.14/0.62  # Total time               : 0.141 s
% 1.14/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 1.14/0.62  
% 1.14/0.62  # -------------------------------------------------
% 1.14/0.62  # User time                : 0.128 s
% 1.14/0.62  # System time              : 0.017 s
% 1.14/0.62  # Total time               : 0.144 s
% 1.14/0.62  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 1.14/0.62  % E---3.1 exiting
% 1.14/0.63  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------