TSTP Solution File: GRP748-5 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GRP748-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 20:51:11 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 4.80s 1.07s
% Output : CNFRefutation 4.80s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 12
% Number of leaves : 9
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 36 ( 30 unt; 4 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 42 ( 41 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 2 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 7 ( 7 usr; 4 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 63 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(f11,axiom,
( mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1)
| mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f11) ).
cnf(f01,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f01) ).
cnf(f08,axiom,
mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X2)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).
cnf(f09,axiom,
mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f09) ).
cnf(f06,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).
cnf(f07,axiom,
mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f07) ).
cnf(f10,axiom,
mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f10) ).
cnf(f02,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).
cnf(goals,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),mult(c,a)) != mult(a,mult(mult(b,c),a)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).
cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
( mult(X1,X2) = mult(X2,X1)
| mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2 ),
f11 ).
cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
mult(X1,ld(X1,X2)) = X2,
f01 ).
cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
mult(mult(X1,X2),i(X2)) = X1,
f08 ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
( ld(X1,X2) = mult(i(X1),X2)
| mult(ld(X1,X2),X1) = X2 ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
( ld(X1,X2) = mult(i(X1),X2)
| ld(X1,X2) = mult(X2,i(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
( ld(X1,X2) = mult(X2,i(X1))
| mult(i(X1),X2) != mult(X2,i(X1)) ),
inference(ef,[status(thm)],[c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,axiom,
mult(X1,i(X1)) = unit,
f09 ).
cnf(c_0_16,axiom,
mult(unit,X1) = X1,
f06 ).
cnf(c_0_17,axiom,
mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),X2) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),
f07 ).
cnf(c_0_18,axiom,
mult(i(X1),X1) = unit,
f10 ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
( mult(X1,mult(X2,i(X1))) = X2
| mult(i(X1),X2) != mult(X2,i(X1)) ),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
i(i(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_15]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,axiom,
ld(X1,mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
f02 ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
mult(i(X1),mult(mult(X1,X2),X1)) = mult(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]),c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
ld(i(X1),X2) = mult(X1,X2),
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_12]),c_0_20]),c_0_10])]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
ld(i(X1),mult(X2,X1)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_22]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
mult(i(X1),mult(X1,X2)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,plain,
mult(mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X2)),i(X2)) = mult(mult(X1,X2),X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_17]) ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
mult(mult(X1,X2),X1) = mult(X1,mult(X2,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_24,c_0_23]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
mult(X1,i(mult(X2,X1))) = i(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,plain,
mult(mult(X1,i(X2)),mult(X2,mult(X3,X2))) = mult(mult(X1,X3),X2),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_26]),c_0_18]),c_0_16]),c_0_20]),c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
i(mult(X1,X2)) = mult(i(X2),i(X1)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),mult(c,a)) != mult(a,mult(mult(b,c),a)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[goals]) ).
cnf(c_0_32,plain,
mult(mult(X1,i(X2)),mult(mult(X2,X3),X1)) = mult(X1,mult(X3,X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_29]),c_0_30]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_33,negated_conjecture,
mult(mult(a,b),mult(c,a)) != mult(a,mult(mult(b,c),a)),
c_0_31 ).
cnf(c_0_34,plain,
mult(mult(X1,X2),mult(X3,X1)) = mult(X1,mult(mult(X2,X3),X1)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_32,c_0_25]),c_0_20]) ).
cnf(c_0_35,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_34])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13 % Problem : GRP748-5 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.13/0.14 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Sun May 19 06:05:07 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.19/0.48 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.19/0.48 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 4.80/1.07 # Version: 3.1.0
% 4.80/1.07 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.80/1.07 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 9912 completed with status 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 4.80/1.07 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.80/1.07 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.80/1.07 # Search class: FGUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 4.80/1.07 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 9916 completed with status 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Result found by G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 4.80/1.07 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 4.80/1.07 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # No SInE strategy applied
% 4.80/1.07 # Search class: FGUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 4.80/1.07 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 4.80/1.07 # Starting G-E--_208_C12_00_F1_SE_CS_PI_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 811s (1) cores
% 4.80/1.07 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 4.80/1.07 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 4.80/1.07
% 4.80/1.07 # Proof found!
% 4.80/1.07 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 4.80/1.07 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 4.80/1.07 # Parsed axioms : 12
% 4.80/1.07 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Initial clauses : 12
% 4.80/1.07 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Initial clauses in saturation : 12
% 4.80/1.07 # Processed clauses : 959
% 4.80/1.07 # ...of these trivial : 169
% 4.80/1.07 # ...subsumed : 512
% 4.80/1.07 # ...remaining for further processing : 278
% 4.80/1.07 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Backward-subsumed : 9
% 4.80/1.07 # Backward-rewritten : 90
% 4.80/1.07 # Generated clauses : 25179
% 4.80/1.07 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 18645
% 4.80/1.07 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Paramodulations : 25167
% 4.80/1.07 # Factorizations : 2
% 4.80/1.07 # NegExts : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Equation resolutions : 10
% 4.80/1.07 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Total rewrite steps : 121030
% 4.80/1.07 # ...of those cached : 116996
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional check models : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 4.80/1.07 # Current number of processed clauses : 167
% 4.80/1.07 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 95
% 4.80/1.07 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Non-unit-clauses : 72
% 4.80/1.07 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 15463
% 4.80/1.07 # ...number of literals in the above : 22645
% 4.80/1.07 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Current number of archived clauses : 111
% 4.80/1.07 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 9888
% 4.80/1.07 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 7183
% 4.80/1.07 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 512
% 4.80/1.07 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 146
% 4.80/1.07 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # BW rewrite match attempts : 867
% 4.80/1.07 # BW rewrite match successes : 81
% 4.80/1.07 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Condensation successes : 0
% 4.80/1.07 # Termbank termtop insertions : 555571
% 4.80/1.07 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 4.80/1.07
% 4.80/1.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.80/1.07 # User time : 0.549 s
% 4.80/1.07 # System time : 0.018 s
% 4.80/1.07 # Total time : 0.567 s
% 4.80/1.07 # Maximum resident set size: 1564 pages
% 4.80/1.07
% 4.80/1.07 # -------------------------------------------------
% 4.80/1.07 # User time : 2.803 s
% 4.80/1.07 # System time : 0.040 s
% 4.80/1.07 # Total time : 2.843 s
% 4.80/1.07 # Maximum resident set size: 1696 pages
% 4.80/1.07 % E---3.1 exiting
% 4.80/1.07 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------