TSTP Solution File: GRP710-11 by Etableau---0.67

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Etableau---0.67
% Problem  : GRP710-11 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s

% Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 09:08:09 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.15s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.15s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.13/0.14  % Problem  : GRP710-11 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.13/0.15  % Command  : etableau --auto --tsmdo --quicksat=10000 --tableau=1 --tableau-saturation=1 -s -p --tableau-cores=8 --cpu-limit=%d %s
% 0.15/0.36  % Computer : n018.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.15/0.36  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 10:26:27 EDT 2022
% 0.15/0.37  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.15/0.39  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.15/0.39  # Auto-Mode selected heuristic H_____047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S
% 0.15/0.39  # and selection function SelectNewComplexAHP.
% 0.15/0.39  #
% 0.15/0.39  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.15/0.39  # Number of axioms: 6 Number of unprocessed: 6
% 0.15/0.39  # Tableaux proof search.
% 0.15/0.39  # APR header successfully linked.
% 0.15/0.39  # Hello from C++
% 0.15/0.39  # The folding up rule is enabled...
% 0.15/0.39  # Local unification is enabled...
% 0.15/0.39  # Any saturation attempts will use folding labels...
% 0.15/0.39  # 6 beginning clauses after preprocessing and clausification
% 0.15/0.39  # Creating start rules for all 1 conjectures.
% 0.15/0.39  # There are 1 start rule candidates:
% 0.15/0.39  # Found 6 unit axioms.
% 0.15/0.39  # 1 start rule tableaux created.
% 0.15/0.39  # 0 extension rule candidate clauses
% 0.15/0.39  # 6 unit axiom clauses
% 0.15/0.39  
% 0.15/0.39  # Requested 8, 32 cores available to the main process.
% 0.15/0.39  # There are not enough tableaux to fork, creating more from the initial 1
% 0.15/0.39  # Creating equality axioms
% 0.15/0.39  # Ran out of tableaux, making start rules for all clauses
% 0.15/0.39  # Returning from population with 10 new_tableaux and 0 remaining starting tableaux.
% 0.15/0.39  # We now have 10 tableaux to operate on
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (mult(X1,unit)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (mult(unit,X1)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (mult(X1,i(X1))=unit)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mult(i(X1),X1)=unit)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),X3)=mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))))).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (mult(X1,x4)!=x3)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (mult(unit,i(unit))=unit), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_22, plain, (mult(unit,i(unit))=unit), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (mult(unit,unit)!=unit), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (mult(unit,i(unit))=mult(unit,unit)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (mult(X1,unit)!=X1), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (mult(mult(unit,i(unit)),mult(X1,unit))=mult(mult(unit,unit),X1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_50, ...])).
% 0.15/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 total branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 of these attempts blocked.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 deferred branch saturation attempts.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 free duplicated saturations.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 total successful branch saturations.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations in interreduction.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 0 successful branch saturations on the branch.
% 0.15/0.41  # There were 1 successful branch saturations after the branch.
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output start for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41  
% 0.15/0.41  # End clausification derivation
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin listing active clauses obtained from FOF to CNF conversion
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_7, plain, (mult(X1,unit)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_8, plain, (mult(unit,X1)=X1)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_10, plain, (mult(X1,i(X1))=unit)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mult(i(X1),X1)=unit)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_9, plain, (mult(mult(mult(X1,X2),X2),X3)=mult(X1,mult(X2,mult(X2,X3))))).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_12, negated_conjecture, (mult(X1,x4)!=x3)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_14, plain, (X4=X4)).
% 0.15/0.41  # End listing active clauses.  There is an equivalent clause to each of these in the clausification!
% 0.15/0.41  # Begin printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41  # Found 6 steps
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_11, plain, (mult(i(unit),unit)=unit), inference(start_rule)).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_23, plain, (mult(i(unit),unit)=unit), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_17])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_45, plain, (mult(unit,unit)!=unit), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_43, plain, (mult(i(unit),unit)=mult(unit,unit)), inference(extension_rule, [i_0_18])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_52, plain, (mult(X1,unit)!=X1), inference(closure_rule, [i_0_7])).
% 0.15/0.41  cnf(i_0_50, plain, (mult(mult(i(unit),unit),mult(X1,unit))=mult(mult(unit,unit),X1)), inference(etableau_closure_rule, [i_0_50, ...])).
% 0.15/0.41  # End printing tableau
% 0.15/0.41  # SZS output end
% 0.15/0.41  # Branches closed with saturation will be marked with an "s"
% 0.15/0.42  # Child (6849) has found a proof.
% 0.15/0.42  
% 0.15/0.42  # Proof search is over...
% 0.15/0.42  # Freeing feature tree
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------