TSTP Solution File: GRP700+1 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP700+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:57 EDT 2023

% Result   : Theorem 5.72s 2.57s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 5.72s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   11
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   31 (  24 unt;   5 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   28 (  27 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    2 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    6 (   4   ~;   1   |;   1   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    5 (   3 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    6 (   3   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   40 (;  39   !;   1   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ rd > mult > ld > #nlpp > unit > #skF_1

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(ld,type,
    ld: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(rd,type,
    rd: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff('#skF_1',type,
    '#skF_1': $i ).

tff(unit,type,
    unit: $i ).

tff(mult,type,
    mult: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(f_32,axiom,
    ! [B,A] : ( mult(rd(A,B),B) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f03) ).

tff(f_36,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( mult(A,unit) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).

tff(f_30,axiom,
    ! [B,A] : ( ld(A,mult(A,B)) = B ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).

tff(f_34,axiom,
    ! [B,A] : ( rd(mult(A,B),B) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f04) ).

tff(f_38,axiom,
    ! [A] : ( mult(unit,A) = A ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f06) ).

tff(f_42,axiom,
    ! [C,B,A] : ( mult(mult(A,B),mult(B,mult(C,B))) = mult(mult(A,mult(B,mult(B,C))),B) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f08) ).

tff(f_48,negated_conjecture,
    ~ ! [X0] :
      ? [X1] :
        ( ( mult(X1,X0) = unit )
        & ( mult(X0,X1) = unit ) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goals) ).

tff(c_6,plain,
    ! [A_6,B_5] : ( mult(rd(A_6,B_5),B_5) = A_6 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_32]) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [A_9] : ( mult(A_9,unit) = A_9 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_36]) ).

tff(c_132,plain,
    ! [A_28,B_29] : ( ld(A_28,mult(A_28,B_29)) = B_29 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_155,plain,
    ! [A_9] : ( ld(A_9,A_9) = unit ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_132]) ).

tff(c_8,plain,
    ! [A_8,B_7] : ( rd(mult(A_8,B_7),B_7) = A_8 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_34]) ).

tff(c_12,plain,
    ! [A_10] : ( mult(unit,A_10) = A_10 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_38]) ).

tff(c_259,plain,
    ! [A_36,B_37,C_38] : ( mult(mult(A_36,mult(B_37,mult(B_37,C_38))),B_37) = mult(mult(A_36,B_37),mult(B_37,mult(C_38,B_37))) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_42]) ).

tff(c_317,plain,
    ! [B_37,C_38] : ( mult(mult(unit,B_37),mult(B_37,mult(C_38,B_37))) = mult(mult(B_37,mult(B_37,C_38)),B_37) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_259]) ).

tff(c_897,plain,
    ! [B_54,C_55] : ( mult(mult(B_54,mult(B_54,C_55)),B_54) = mult(B_54,mult(B_54,mult(C_55,B_54))) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_12,c_317]) ).

tff(c_2520,plain,
    ! [B_81,C_82] : ( rd(mult(B_81,mult(B_81,mult(C_82,B_81))),B_81) = mult(B_81,mult(B_81,C_82)) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_897,c_8]) ).

tff(c_3028,plain,
    ! [B_88,A_89] : ( rd(mult(B_88,mult(B_88,A_89)),B_88) = mult(B_88,mult(B_88,rd(A_89,B_88))) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_2520]) ).

tff(c_3120,plain,
    ! [A_9] : ( mult(A_9,mult(A_9,rd(unit,A_9))) = rd(mult(A_9,A_9),A_9) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_3028]) ).

tff(c_3146,plain,
    ! [A_90] : ( mult(A_90,mult(A_90,rd(unit,A_90))) = A_90 ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_3120]) ).

tff(c_4,plain,
    ! [A_4,B_3] : ( ld(A_4,mult(A_4,B_3)) = B_3 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_30]) ).

tff(c_3230,plain,
    ! [A_90] : ( mult(A_90,rd(unit,A_90)) = ld(A_90,A_90) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3146,c_4]) ).

tff(c_3302,plain,
    ! [A_92] : ( mult(A_92,rd(unit,A_92)) = unit ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_155,c_3230]) ).

tff(c_18,plain,
    ! [X1_18] :
      ( ( mult('#skF_1',X1_18) != unit )
      | ( mult(X1_18,'#skF_1') != unit ) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_48]) ).

tff(c_3370,plain,
    mult(rd(unit,'#skF_1'),'#skF_1') != unit,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_3302,c_18]) ).

tff(c_3422,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_3370]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.14  % Problem  : GRP700+1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v4.0.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n023.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:34:37 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime  : 
% 5.72/2.57  % SZS status Theorem for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 5.72/2.57  
% 5.72/2.57  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 5.72/2.62  
% 5.72/2.62  Inference rules
% 5.72/2.62  ----------------------
% 5.72/2.62  #Ref     : 0
% 5.72/2.62  #Sup     : 866
% 5.72/2.62  #Fact    : 0
% 5.72/2.62  #Define  : 0
% 5.72/2.62  #Split   : 2
% 5.72/2.62  #Chain   : 0
% 5.72/2.62  #Close   : 0
% 5.72/2.62  
% 5.72/2.62  Ordering : KBO
% 5.72/2.62  
% 5.72/2.62  Simplification rules
% 5.72/2.62  ----------------------
% 5.72/2.62  #Subsume      : 6
% 5.72/2.62  #Demod        : 1481
% 5.72/2.62  #Tautology    : 319
% 5.72/2.62  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 5.72/2.62  #BackRed      : 1
% 5.72/2.62  
% 5.72/2.62  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 5.72/2.62  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 5.72/2.62  
% 5.72/2.62  Timing (in seconds)
% 5.72/2.62  ----------------------
% 5.72/2.63  Preprocessing        : 0.50
% 5.72/2.63  Parsing              : 0.24
% 5.72/2.63  CNF conversion       : 0.04
% 5.72/2.63  Main loop            : 0.97
% 5.72/2.63  Inferencing          : 0.34
% 5.72/2.63  Reduction            : 0.40
% 5.72/2.63  Demodulation         : 0.34
% 5.72/2.63  BG Simplification    : 0.05
% 5.72/2.63  Subsumption          : 0.13
% 5.72/2.63  Abstraction          : 0.06
% 5.72/2.63  MUC search           : 0.00
% 5.72/2.63  Cooper               : 0.00
% 5.72/2.63  Total                : 1.55
% 5.72/2.63  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 5.72/2.63  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 5.72/2.63  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 5.72/2.63  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------