TSTP Solution File: GRP656-10 by iProver---3.9
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : iProver---3.9
% Problem : GRP656-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May 3 02:23:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.41s 1.10s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.41s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 6
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 24 ( 24 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 24 ( 23 equ; 5 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 5 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 0 con; 1-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 48 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
mult(X0,ld(X0,X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f01) ).
cnf(c_50,plain,
ld(X0,mult(X0,X1)) = X1,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f02) ).
cnf(c_51,plain,
mult(rd(X0,X1),X1) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f03) ).
cnf(c_52,plain,
rd(mult(X0,X1),X1) = X0,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f04) ).
cnf(c_53,plain,
mult(mult(X0,mult(X1,X2)),X0) = mult(mult(X0,X1),mult(X2,X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',f05) ).
cnf(c_54,negated_conjecture,
tuple(mult(X0,x1(X0)),mult(x1_2(X0),X0)) != tuple(x1(X0),x1_2(X0)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',goal) ).
cnf(c_79,negated_conjecture,
tuple(mult(X0,x1(X0)),mult(x1_2(X0),X0)) != tuple(x1(X0),x1_2(X0)),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_54]) ).
cnf(c_131,plain,
ld(rd(X0,X1),X0) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_141,plain,
mult(mult(X0,X1),mult(ld(X1,X2),X0)) = mult(mult(X0,X2),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_142,plain,
mult(mult(X0,rd(X1,X2)),mult(X2,X0)) = mult(mult(X0,X1),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_53]) ).
cnf(c_144,plain,
rd(mult(mult(X0,X1),mult(X2,X0)),X0) = mult(X0,mult(X1,X2)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_53,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_235,plain,
mult(mult(X0,rd(X1,rd(X2,X0))),X2) = mult(mult(X0,X1),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_142]) ).
cnf(c_325,plain,
mult(X0,mult(X1,ld(X1,X2))) = rd(mult(mult(X0,X2),X0),X0),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_141,c_144]) ).
cnf(c_557,plain,
mult(X0,rd(X1,rd(X2,X0))) = rd(mult(mult(X0,X1),X0),X2),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_235,c_52]) ).
cnf(c_637,plain,
mult(X0,rd(X1,rd(X0,X0))) = mult(X0,X1),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_325,c_49,c_557]) ).
cnf(c_642,plain,
ld(X0,mult(X0,X1)) = rd(X1,rd(X0,X0)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_637,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_650,plain,
rd(X0,rd(X1,X1)) = X0,
inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_642,c_50]) ).
cnf(c_699,plain,
ld(X0,X0) = rd(X1,X1),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_650,c_131]) ).
cnf(c_700,plain,
mult(X0,rd(X1,X1)) = X0,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_650,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_718,plain,
mult(ld(X0,X0),X1) = X1,
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_699,c_51]) ).
cnf(c_772,plain,
tuple(mult(rd(X0,X0),x1(rd(X0,X0))),x1_2(rd(X0,X0))) != tuple(x1(rd(X0,X0)),x1_2(rd(X0,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_700,c_79]) ).
cnf(c_836,plain,
tuple(mult(ld(X0,X0),x1(ld(X0,X0))),x1_2(ld(X0,X0))) != tuple(x1(ld(X0,X0)),x1_2(ld(X0,X0))),
inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_699,c_772]) ).
cnf(c_839,plain,
tuple(x1(ld(X0,X0)),x1_2(ld(X0,X0))) != tuple(x1(ld(X0,X0)),x1_2(ld(X0,X0))),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_836,c_718]) ).
cnf(c_840,plain,
$false,
inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_839]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.11 % Problem : GRP656-10 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v8.1.0.
% 0.06/0.11 % Command : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.32 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.32 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.32 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.32 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.32 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.32 % DateTime : Thu May 2 23:44:27 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32 % CPUTime :
% 0.17/0.43 Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.17/0.43 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule casc_24_ueq --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.41/1.10 % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.10 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ iProver source info
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.41/1.10 git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.41/1.10 git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0 sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e pe_s pe_e
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... gs_s sp: 0 0s gs_e snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Preprocessing... sf_s rm: 0 0s sf_e
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Problem Properties
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 clauses 6
% 3.41/1.10 conjectures 1
% 3.41/1.10 EPR 0
% 3.41/1.10 Horn 6
% 3.41/1.10 unary 6
% 3.41/1.10 binary 0
% 3.41/1.10 lits 6
% 3.41/1.10 lits eq 6
% 3.41/1.10 fd_pure 0
% 3.41/1.10 fd_pseudo 0
% 3.41/1.10 fd_cond 0
% 3.41/1.10 fd_pseudo_cond 0
% 3.41/1.10 AC symbols 0
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------
% 3.41/1.10 Current options:
% 3.41/1.10 ------
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 ------ Proving...
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.41/1.10
% 3.41/1.10 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.41/1.11
% 3.41/1.11
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------