TSTP Solution File: GRP639+1 by Enigma---0.5.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Enigma---0.5.1
% Problem  : GRP639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1

% Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 08:39:45 EDT 2022

% Result   : Theorem 7.63s 2.45s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 7.63s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    7
%            Number of leaves      :   17
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   44 (  22 unt;   7 nHn;  42 RR)
%            Number of literals    :  107 (   4 equ;  65 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :   15 (  13 usr;   1 prp; 0-3 aty)
%            Number of functors    :   10 (  10 usr;   4 con; 0-4 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   51 (   6 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(i_0_1,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0),esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0)))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_1) ).

cnf(i_0_82,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_82) ).

cnf(i_0_4,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_4) ).

cnf(i_0_5,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk3_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_5) ).

cnf(i_0_86,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_86) ).

cnf(i_0_84,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_84) ).

cnf(i_0_3,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_3) ).

cnf(i_0_18,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_18) ).

cnf(i_0_48,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_48) ).

cnf(i_0_31,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_31) ).

cnf(i_0_38,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_38) ).

cnf(i_0_39,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_39) ).

cnf(i_0_2,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_2) ).

cnf(i_0_10,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_10) ).

cnf(i_0_11,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_11) ).

cnf(i_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_12) ).

cnf(i_0_13,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/enigma-theBenchmark.p-6t1j4r7u/input.p',i_0_13) ).

cnf(c_0_104,negated_conjecture,
    ~ r1_tarski(k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0),esk3_0,esk4_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0),esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0)))),
    i_0_1 ).

cnf(c_0_105,plain,
    ( k2_funct_2(X1,X2,X3,X4) = k9_relat_1(X3,X4)
    | ~ v1_funct_1(X3)
    | ~ v1_funct_2(X3,X1,X2)
    | ~ m1_relset_1(X3,X1,X2) ),
    i_0_82 ).

cnf(c_0_106,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_2(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    i_0_4 ).

cnf(c_0_107,negated_conjecture,
    v1_funct_1(esk3_0),
    i_0_5 ).

cnf(c_0_108,negated_conjecture,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(esk3_0,esk4_0),k2_funct_2(u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0),esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0)))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_104,c_0_105]),c_0_106]),c_0_107])]) ).

cnf(c_0_109,plain,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))
    | ~ r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(esk3_0,esk4_0),k9_relat_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0)))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_108,c_0_105]),c_0_106]),c_0_107])]) ).

cnf(c_0_110,plain,
    ( r1_tarski(k9_relat_1(X1,X2),k9_relat_1(X1,X3))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ r1_tarski(X2,X3) ),
    i_0_86 ).

cnf(c_0_111,plain,
    ( m1_relset_1(X1,X2,X3)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_84 ).

cnf(c_0_112,negated_conjecture,
    m2_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    i_0_3 ).

cnf(c_0_113,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3))) ),
    i_0_18 ).

cnf(c_0_114,plain,
    ( m1_subset_1(X1,k1_zfmisc_1(k2_zfmisc_1(X2,X3)))
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    i_0_48 ).

cnf(c_0_115,plain,
    ( ~ m1_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0))
    | ~ v1_relat_1(esk3_0)
    | ~ r1_tarski(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0))) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_109,c_0_110]) ).

cnf(c_0_116,negated_conjecture,
    m1_relset_1(esk3_0,u1_struct_0(esk1_0),u1_struct_0(esk2_0)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_111,c_0_112]) ).

cnf(c_0_117,plain,
    ( v1_relat_1(X1)
    | ~ m2_relset_1(X1,X2,X3) ),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_113,c_0_114]) ).

cnf(c_0_118,plain,
    ( ~ v1_relat_1(esk3_0)
    | ~ r1_tarski(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0))) ),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_115,c_0_116])]) ).

cnf(c_0_119,negated_conjecture,
    v1_relat_1(esk3_0),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_117,c_0_112]) ).

cnf(c_0_120,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(X3))
    | X3 != k5_group_4(X1,X2)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v1_group_1(X3)
    | ~ m1_group_2(X3,X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_31 ).

cnf(c_0_121,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | m1_group_2(k5_group_4(X1,X2),X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_38 ).

cnf(c_0_122,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | v1_group_1(k5_group_4(X1,X2))
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1))) ),
    i_0_39 ).

cnf(c_0_123,plain,
    ~ r1_tarski(esk4_0,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(esk1_0,esk4_0))),
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_118,c_0_119])]) ).

cnf(c_0_124,plain,
    ( v3_struct_0(X1)
    | r1_tarski(X2,u1_struct_0(k5_group_4(X1,X2)))
    | ~ m1_subset_1(X2,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(X1)))
    | ~ l1_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v4_group_1(X1)
    | ~ v3_group_1(X1) ),
    inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(csr,[status(thm)],[inference(er,[status(thm)],[c_0_120]),c_0_121]),c_0_122]) ).

cnf(c_0_125,negated_conjecture,
    m1_subset_1(esk4_0,k1_zfmisc_1(u1_struct_0(esk1_0))),
    i_0_2 ).

cnf(c_0_126,negated_conjecture,
    l1_group_1(esk1_0),
    i_0_10 ).

cnf(c_0_127,negated_conjecture,
    v4_group_1(esk1_0),
    i_0_11 ).

cnf(c_0_128,negated_conjecture,
    v3_group_1(esk1_0),
    i_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_129,negated_conjecture,
    ~ v3_struct_0(esk1_0),
    i_0_13 ).

cnf(c_0_130,plain,
    $false,
    inference(sr,[status(thm)],[inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_123,c_0_124]),c_0_125]),c_0_126]),c_0_127]),c_0_128])]),c_0_129]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem  : GRP639+1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v3.4.0.
% 0.04/0.13  % Command  : enigmatic-eprover.py %s %d 1
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n005.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 11:47:40 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  # ENIGMATIC: Selected complete mode:
% 7.63/2.45  # ENIGMATIC: Solved by autoschedule:
% 7.63/2.45  # No SInE strategy applied
% 7.63/2.45  # Trying AutoSched0 for 150 seconds
% 7.63/2.45  # AutoSched0-Mode selected heuristic G_E___302_C18_F1_URBAN_S0Y
% 7.63/2.45  # and selection function SelectMaxLComplexAvoidPosPred.
% 7.63/2.45  #
% 7.63/2.45  # Preprocessing time       : 0.018 s
% 7.63/2.45  
% 7.63/2.45  # Proof found!
% 7.63/2.45  # SZS status Theorem
% 7.63/2.45  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 7.63/2.45  # Training examples: 0 positive, 0 negative
% 7.63/2.45  
% 7.63/2.45  # -------------------------------------------------
% 7.63/2.45  # User time                : 0.026 s
% 7.63/2.45  # System time              : 0.009 s
% 7.63/2.45  # Total time               : 0.035 s
% 7.63/2.45  # Maximum resident set size: 7124 pages
% 7.63/2.45  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------