TSTP Solution File: GRP595-1 by E---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E---3.1.00
% Problem : GRP595-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May 4 07:53:19 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.16s 0.44s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.16s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 17
% Number of leaves : 3
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 32 ( 32 unt; 0 nHn; 5 RR)
% Number of literals : 32 ( 31 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 7 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 6 ( 6 usr; 3 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 71 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X3,X2)))))) = X3,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIaEWyycZZ/E---3.1_8245.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIaEWyycZZ/E---3.1_8245.p',multiply) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIaEWyycZZ/E---3.1_8245.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).
cnf(c_0_3,axiom,
inverse(double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),inverse(double_divide(X1,inverse(double_divide(X3,X2)))))) = X3,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = inverse(double_divide(X2,X1)),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_5,plain,
multiply(multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3),double_divide(X3,X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_3,c_0_4]),c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_6,plain,
multiply(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,X3),multiply(X3,X1))) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_7,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),double_divide(X2,multiply(multiply(X3,X1),X4))) = double_divide(X4,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
double_divide(multiply(X1,double_divide(X2,multiply(X3,X1))),X3) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3),multiply(X3,X1)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_7]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),double_divide(multiply(X2,X3),X1)) = inverse(X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),double_divide(double_divide(multiply(X2,X1),X3),X3)) = X2,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_10]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,plain,
double_divide(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X3,inverse(X2))) = double_divide(X1,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_13,plain,
double_divide(multiply(inverse(X1),double_divide(X2,X3)),X3) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_12]) ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
multiply(double_divide(multiply(X1,X2),X3),X2) = double_divide(X1,X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_11]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,plain,
multiply(X1,double_divide(X1,multiply(X2,X3))) = double_divide(X3,X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = X1,
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,double_divide(X3,multiply(X1,X2)))) = inverse(X3),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_18,plain,
multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = X2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_16]) ).
cnf(c_0_19,plain,
inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = double_divide(X2,X1),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_20,plain,
multiply(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = inverse(X2),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_15]) ).
cnf(c_0_21,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).
cnf(c_0_22,plain,
multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = inverse(X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_18]),c_0_19]) ).
cnf(c_0_23,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,inverse(X2)),multiply(X3,X2)) = multiply(X1,X3),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_11]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_24,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),inverse(X2)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_18,c_0_20]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_25,plain,
inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_10]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_26,negated_conjecture,
multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
c_0_21 ).
cnf(c_0_27,plain,
multiply(X1,X2) = multiply(X2,X1),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_16]),c_0_4]) ).
cnf(c_0_28,plain,
multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X3,X2)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_24]),c_0_25]) ).
cnf(c_0_29,negated_conjecture,
multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]) ).
cnf(c_0_30,plain,
multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)) = multiply(X2,multiply(X1,X3)),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_28]) ).
cnf(c_0_31,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_30]),c_0_27])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.10 % Problem : GRP595-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.11 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31 % DateTime : Fri May 3 15:58:07 EDT 2024
% 0.16/0.31 % CPUTime :
% 0.16/0.42 Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.gIaEWyycZZ/E---3.1_8245.p
% 0.16/0.44 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # new_bool_3 with pid 8324 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by new_bool_3
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with pid 8328 completed with status 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Result found by SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # SinE strategy is GSinE(CountFormulas,hypos,1.5,,3,20000,1.0)
% 0.16/0.44 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-DFFFFFNN
% 0.16/0.44 # Scheduled 5 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.16/0.44 # Starting SAT001_MinMin_p005000_rr_RG with 181s (1) cores
% 0.16/0.44 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # Proof found!
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.16/0.44 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.16/0.44 # Parsed axioms : 3
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses : 3
% 0.16/0.44 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.16/0.44 # Processed clauses : 102
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of these trivial : 28
% 0.16/0.44 # ...subsumed : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # ...remaining for further processing : 52
% 0.16/0.44 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Backward-rewritten : 27
% 0.16/0.44 # Generated clauses : 1324
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1161
% 0.16/0.44 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Paramodulations : 1324
% 0.16/0.44 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # NegExts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Total rewrite steps : 571
% 0.16/0.44 # ...of those cached : 285
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of processed clauses : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 19
% 0.16/0.44 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 3
% 0.16/0.44 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1028
% 0.16/0.44 # ...number of literals in the above : 1028
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Current number of archived clauses : 30
% 0.16/0.44 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 22
% 0.16/0.44 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match attempts : 175
% 0.16/0.44 # BW rewrite match successes : 137
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.16/0.44 # Termbank termtop insertions : 9385
% 0.16/0.44 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.013 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.001 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.014 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1624 pages
% 0.16/0.44
% 0.16/0.44 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.16/0.44 # User time : 0.015 s
% 0.16/0.44 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Total time : 0.017 s
% 0.16/0.44 # Maximum resident set size: 1692 pages
% 0.16/0.44 % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.16/0.44 % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------