TSTP Solution File: GRP582-1 by Twee---2.4.2
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Twee---2.4.2
% Problem : GRP582-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:19:00 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.14s 0.38s
% Output : Proof 0.19s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP582-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.13 % Command : parallel-twee %s --tstp --conditional-encoding if --smaller --drop-non-horn --give-up-on-saturation --explain-encoding --formal-proof
% 0.14/0.33 % Computer : n025.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:02:09 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.14/0.38 Command-line arguments: --lhs-weight 1 --flip-ordering --normalise-queue-percent 10 --cp-renormalise-threshold 10
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.38 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.14/0.38
% 0.14/0.39 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 1 (inverse): inverse(X) = double_divide(X, identity).
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 2 (identity): identity = double_divide(X, inverse(X)).
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 3 (multiply): multiply(X, Y) = double_divide(double_divide(Y, X), identity).
% 0.14/0.39 Axiom 4 (single_axiom): double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(Z, double_divide(Y, X)))), double_divide(identity, identity)) = Z.
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 5: inverse(double_divide(X, Y)) = multiply(Y, X).
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 inverse(double_divide(X, Y))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(X, Y), identity)
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 3 (multiply) R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 multiply(Y, X)
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 6: double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(Z, double_divide(Y, X)))), inverse(identity)) = Z.
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(Z, double_divide(Y, X)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y), double_divide(Z, double_divide(Y, X)))), double_divide(identity, identity))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 4 (single_axiom) }
% 0.14/0.39 Z
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 7: double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(Y, inverse(X)))), inverse(identity)) = Y.
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(Y, inverse(X)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(Y, double_divide(X, identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.14/0.39 Y
% 0.14/0.39
% 0.14/0.39 Lemma 8: double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(X, identity)), inverse(identity)) = X.
% 0.14/0.39 Proof:
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(X, identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.14/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.14/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, X))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (identity) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, X), double_divide(X, inverse(X)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.19/0.39 X
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Lemma 9: inverse(identity) = identity.
% 0.19/0.39 Proof:
% 0.19/0.39 inverse(identity)
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(inverse(identity), identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(identity, inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 identity
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Lemma 10: double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(Y, double_divide(identity, X)))), inverse(identity)) = Y.
% 0.19/0.39 Proof:
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(Y, double_divide(identity, X)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(X, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(Y, double_divide(identity, X)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 6 }
% 0.19/0.39 Y
% 0.19/0.39
% 0.19/0.39 Goal 1 (prove_these_axioms_2): multiply(identity, a2) = a2.
% 0.19/0.39 Proof:
% 0.19/0.39 multiply(identity, a2)
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 inverse(double_divide(a2, identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 inverse(inverse(a2))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(inverse(a2), identity)
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(inverse(a2), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, identity), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, inverse(identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, inverse(inverse(identity))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 8 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(identity, identity)), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, identity))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.39 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), identity)), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.39 = { by lemma 6 R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity))), inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))))))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 2 (identity) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(identity, identity))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), inverse(identity))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)))), double_divide(identity, a2)), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), double_divide(identity, identity)), inverse(identity)), double_divide(identity, a2)), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), inverse(identity)), inverse(identity)), double_divide(identity, a2)), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 7 }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), inverse(identity)), inverse(identity)), double_divide(identity, a2)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), inverse(identity)), identity), double_divide(identity, a2)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 9 }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(multiply(double_divide(double_divide(identity, a2), identity), identity), double_divide(identity, a2)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(a2, double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(multiply(inverse(double_divide(identity, a2)), identity), double_divide(identity, a2)))), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 10 }
% 0.19/0.40 multiply(inverse(double_divide(identity, a2)), identity)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 5 }
% 0.19/0.40 multiply(multiply(a2, identity), identity)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 5 R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 inverse(double_divide(identity, multiply(a2, identity)))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by axiom 1 (inverse) }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(a2, identity)), identity)
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 9 R->L }
% 0.19/0.40 double_divide(double_divide(identity, multiply(a2, identity)), inverse(identity))
% 0.19/0.40 = { by lemma 8 }
% 0.19/0.40 a2
% 0.19/0.40 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.40
% 0.19/0.40 RESULT: Unsatisfiable (the axioms are contradictory).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------