TSTP Solution File: GRP577-1 by Beagle---0.9.51
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem : GRP577-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:41:33 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 3.27s 1.86s
% Output : CNFRefutation 3.27s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 11
% Number of leaves : 10
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 35 ( 30 unt; 5 typ; 0 def)
% Number of atoms : 30 ( 29 equ)
% Maximal formula atoms : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Number of connectives : 3 ( 3 ~; 0 |; 0 &)
% ( 0 <=>; 0 =>; 0 <=; 0 <~>)
% Maximal formula depth : 4 ( 2 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of types : 1 ( 0 usr)
% Number of type conns : 5 ( 3 >; 2 *; 0 +; 0 <<)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 33 (; 33 !; 0 ?; 0 :)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > double_divide > #nlpp > inverse > identity > a1
%Foreground sorts:
%Background operators:
%Foreground operators:
tff(a1,type,
a1: $i ).
tff(inverse,type,
inverse: $i > $i ).
tff(double_divide,type,
double_divide: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(multiply,type,
multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).
tff(identity,type,
identity: $i ).
tff(f_27,axiom,
! [A] : ( inverse(A) = double_divide(A,identity) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_29,axiom,
! [A] : ( identity = double_divide(A,inverse(A)) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_25,axiom,
! [A,B] : ( multiply(A,B) = double_divide(double_divide(B,A),identity) ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_31,axiom,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(f_23,axiom,
! [A,B,C] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(B,A),C),double_divide(B,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = C ),
file(unknown,unknown) ).
tff(c_6,plain,
! [A_6] : ( double_divide(A_6,identity) = inverse(A_6) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_27]) ).
tff(c_8,plain,
! [A_7] : ( double_divide(A_7,inverse(A_7)) = identity ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_29]) ).
tff(c_28,plain,
! [B_10,A_11] : ( double_divide(double_divide(B_10,A_11),identity) = multiply(A_11,B_10) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).
tff(c_52,plain,
! [A_7] : ( multiply(inverse(A_7),A_7) = double_divide(identity,identity) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_28]) ).
tff(c_57,plain,
! [A_7] : ( multiply(inverse(A_7),A_7) = inverse(identity) ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_52]) ).
tff(c_10,plain,
multiply(inverse(a1),a1) != identity,
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_31]) ).
tff(c_58,plain,
inverse(identity) != identity,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_10]) ).
tff(c_119,plain,
! [B_16,A_17] : ( inverse(double_divide(B_16,A_17)) = multiply(A_17,B_16) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_28]) ).
tff(c_143,plain,
! [A_6] : ( inverse(inverse(A_6)) = multiply(identity,A_6) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_119]) ).
tff(c_49,plain,
! [B_10,A_11] : ( inverse(double_divide(B_10,A_11)) = multiply(A_11,B_10) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_28]) ).
tff(c_2,plain,
! [A_1,B_2,C_3] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A_1,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(B_2,A_1),C_3),double_divide(B_2,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = C_3 ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_23]) ).
tff(c_66,plain,
! [A_13,B_14,C_15] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A_13,double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(B_14,A_13),C_15),inverse(B_14))),inverse(identity)) = C_15 ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_6,c_6,c_2]) ).
tff(c_521,plain,
! [A_31,C_32] : ( double_divide(double_divide(inverse(A_31),double_divide(double_divide(identity,C_32),inverse(A_31))),inverse(identity)) = C_32 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_66]) ).
tff(c_580,plain,
! [C_32] : ( double_divide(double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity,C_32)),identity),inverse(identity)) = C_32 ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_8,c_521]) ).
tff(c_593,plain,
! [C_33] : ( double_divide(inverse(multiply(C_33,identity)),inverse(identity)) = C_33 ),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_49,c_6,c_580]) ).
tff(c_621,plain,
double_divide(inverse(inverse(identity)),inverse(identity)) = inverse(identity),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_593]) ).
tff(c_626,plain,
double_divide(multiply(identity,identity),inverse(identity)) = inverse(identity),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_143,c_621]) ).
tff(c_656,plain,
! [C_34] : ( multiply(inverse(identity),inverse(multiply(C_34,identity))) = inverse(C_34) ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_593,c_49]) ).
tff(c_675,plain,
multiply(inverse(identity),inverse(inverse(identity))) = inverse(inverse(identity)),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_57,c_656]) ).
tff(c_681,plain,
multiply(inverse(identity),multiply(identity,identity)) = multiply(identity,identity),
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_143,c_143,c_675]) ).
tff(c_4,plain,
! [B_5,A_4] : ( double_divide(double_divide(B_5,A_4),identity) = multiply(A_4,B_5) ),
inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_25]) ).
tff(c_101,plain,
! [A_4,B_5] : ( double_divide(double_divide(A_4,double_divide(multiply(A_4,B_5),inverse(B_5))),inverse(identity)) = identity ),
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_4,c_66]) ).
tff(c_743,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(inverse(identity),double_divide(multiply(identity,identity),inverse(multiply(identity,identity)))),inverse(identity)) = identity,
inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_681,c_101]) ).
tff(c_750,plain,
inverse(identity) = identity,
inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_626,c_143,c_6,c_8,c_743]) ).
tff(c_752,plain,
$false,
inference(negUnitSimplification,[status(thm)],[c_58,c_750]) ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.14 % Problem : GRP577-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.14/0.15 % Command : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.15/0.36 % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.36 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.36 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.36 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.36 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.15/0.36 % DateTime : Thu Aug 3 21:56:31 EDT 2023
% 0.15/0.36 % CPUTime :
% 3.27/1.86 % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 3.27/1.86
% 3.27/1.86 % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.27/1.89
% 3.27/1.89 Inference rules
% 3.27/1.89 ----------------------
% 3.27/1.89 #Ref : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Sup : 195
% 3.27/1.89 #Fact : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Define : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Split : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Chain : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Close : 0
% 3.27/1.89
% 3.27/1.89 Ordering : KBO
% 3.27/1.89
% 3.27/1.89 Simplification rules
% 3.27/1.89 ----------------------
% 3.27/1.89 #Subsume : 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Demod : 157
% 3.27/1.89 #Tautology : 98
% 3.27/1.89 #SimpNegUnit : 1
% 3.27/1.89 #BackRed : 1
% 3.27/1.89
% 3.27/1.89 #Partial instantiations: 0
% 3.27/1.89 #Strategies tried : 1
% 3.27/1.89
% 3.27/1.89 Timing (in seconds)
% 3.27/1.89 ----------------------
% 3.27/1.90 Preprocessing : 0.41
% 3.27/1.90 Parsing : 0.21
% 3.27/1.90 CNF conversion : 0.02
% 3.27/1.90 Main loop : 0.41
% 3.27/1.90 Inferencing : 0.15
% 3.27/1.90 Reduction : 0.14
% 3.27/1.90 Demodulation : 0.11
% 3.27/1.90 BG Simplification : 0.02
% 3.27/1.90 Subsumption : 0.07
% 3.27/1.90 Abstraction : 0.02
% 3.27/1.90 MUC search : 0.00
% 3.27/1.90 Cooper : 0.00
% 3.27/1.90 Total : 0.87
% 3.27/1.90 Index Insertion : 0.00
% 3.27/1.90 Index Deletion : 0.00
% 3.27/1.90 Index Matching : 0.00
% 3.27/1.90 BG Taut test : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------