TSTP Solution File: GRP570-1 by E-SAT---3.1.00
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem : GRP570-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : run_E %s %d THM
% Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Mon May 20 20:58:00 EDT 2024
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.36s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : Refutation
% Derivation depth : 7
% Number of leaves : 5
% Syntax : Number of clauses : 18 ( 18 unt; 0 nHn; 6 RR)
% Number of literals : 18 ( 17 equ; 4 neg)
% Maximal clause size : 1 ( 1 avg)
% Maximal term depth : 6 ( 2 avg)
% Number of predicates : 2 ( 0 usr; 1 prp; 0-2 aty)
% Number of functors : 5 ( 5 usr; 2 con; 0-2 aty)
% Number of variables : 18 ( 0 sgn)
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(identity,axiom,
identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',identity) ).
cnf(inverse,axiom,
inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',inverse) ).
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3)),double_divide(X3,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = X2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).
cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
multiply(identity,a2) != a2,
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).
cnf(multiply,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',multiply) ).
cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
identity ).
cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
inverse ).
cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X1,X3)),double_divide(X3,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = X2,
single_axiom ).
cnf(c_0_8,plain,
identity = double_divide(X1,double_divide(X1,identity)),
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).
cnf(c_0_9,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),double_divide(identity,identity)) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_8]) ).
cnf(c_0_10,negated_conjecture,
multiply(identity,a2) != a2,
inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_2]) ).
cnf(c_0_11,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,double_divide(identity,identity))),double_divide(identity,identity)) = double_divide(X1,identity),
inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
multiply(identity,a2) != a2,
c_0_10 ).
cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
multiply ).
cnf(c_0_14,plain,
double_divide(identity,identity) = identity,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).
cnf(c_0_15,negated_conjecture,
double_divide(double_divide(a2,identity),identity) != a2,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]) ).
cnf(c_0_16,plain,
double_divide(double_divide(X1,identity),identity) = X1,
inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_14]) ).
cnf(c_0_17,negated_conjecture,
$false,
inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_16])]),
[proof] ).
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.08 % Problem : GRP570-1 : TPTP v8.2.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.00/0.09 % Command : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.08/0.27 % Computer : n032.cluster.edu
% 0.08/0.27 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.08/0.27 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.08/0.27 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.08/0.27 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.08/0.27 % DateTime : Sun May 19 05:12:37 EDT 2024
% 0.08/0.28 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.36 Running first-order model finding
% 0.13/0.36 Running: /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.36 # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.13/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with pid 5851 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Result found by G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN
% 0.13/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.36 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting new_bool_3 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting new_bool_1 with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting sh5l with 136s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with pid 5856 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y
% 0.13/0.36 # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.36 # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.13/0.36 # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF22-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.36 # Scheduled 6 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.13/0.36 # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_AE_CS_SP_S0Y with 811s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.36 # Preprocessing time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.36 # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.36 # Parsed axioms : 5
% 0.13/0.36 # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Initial clauses : 5
% 0.13/0.36 # Removed in clause preprocessing : 2
% 0.13/0.36 # Initial clauses in saturation : 3
% 0.13/0.36 # Processed clauses : 8
% 0.13/0.36 # ...of these trivial : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # ...subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # ...remaining for further processing : 8
% 0.13/0.36 # Other redundant clauses eliminated : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Clauses deleted for lack of memory : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Backward-subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Backward-rewritten : 5
% 0.13/0.36 # Generated clauses : 35
% 0.13/0.36 # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 36
% 0.13/0.36 # ...aggressively subsumed : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Contextual simplify-reflections : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Paramodulations : 35
% 0.13/0.36 # Factorizations : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # NegExts : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Equation resolutions : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Disequality decompositions : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Total rewrite steps : 16
% 0.13/0.36 # ...of those cached : 9
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional unsat checks : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional check models : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional unsat core size : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional preprocessing time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Propositional solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Success case prop preproc time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Success case prop encoding time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Success case prop solver time : 0.000
% 0.13/0.36 # Current number of processed clauses : 3
% 0.13/0.36 # Positive orientable unit clauses : 3
% 0.13/0.36 # Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Negative unit clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Non-unit-clauses : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 31
% 0.13/0.36 # ...number of literals in the above : 31
% 0.13/0.36 # Current number of archived formulas : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Current number of archived clauses : 7
% 0.13/0.36 # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # BW rewrite match attempts : 2
% 0.13/0.36 # BW rewrite match successes : 2
% 0.13/0.36 # Condensation attempts : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Condensation successes : 0
% 0.13/0.36 # Termbank termtop insertions : 823
% 0.13/0.36 # Search garbage collected termcells : 2
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 # User time : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.36 # System time : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.36 # Total time : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.36 # Maximum resident set size: 1572 pages
% 0.13/0.36
% 0.13/0.36 # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.36 # User time : 0.008 s
% 0.13/0.36 # System time : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.36 # Total time : 0.012 s
% 0.13/0.36 # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.13/0.36 % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------