TSTP Solution File: GRP511-1 by SNARK---20120808r022

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SNARK---20120808r022
% Problem  : GRP511-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run-snark %s %d

% Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:39:13 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.45s 0.62s
% Output   : Refutation 0.45s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   16
%            Number of leaves      :    2
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   37 (  37 unt;   0 nHn;   3 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   37 (  36 equ;   2 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    9 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :  107 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    multiply(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z),inverse(multiply(X,Z))) = Y,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(3,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),inverse(multiply(Y,Z))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(4,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Z,X),U),Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(6,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(U,Z),inverse(multiply(U,X)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(7,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),inverse(Z)))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(U,Y),inverse(multiply(U,Z)))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(11,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,multiply(Y,U)),inverse(multiply(Z,X))))))) = U,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[single_axiom,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(13,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,Z))),inverse(X)) = inverse(multiply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(14,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(X,Y),Z))))) = Z,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(19,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y,Z),X),inverse(inverse(multiply(U,V)))))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(U,Y),V),Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[3,4,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(21,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(U,inverse(multiply(multiply(V,multiply(U,X)),inverse(multiply(V,Z)))))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(23,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y,Z),U),inverse(multiply(multiply(V,Z),inverse(multiply(V,X))))))) = inverse(multiply(Y,U)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[4,3,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(27,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),inverse(X)) = inverse(Y),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[13,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(30,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,X),Z))) = inverse(multiply(Y,Z)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,single_axiom,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(31,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(inverse(multiply(Z,U))))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Z,X),U),Y)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[19,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(33,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(multiply(X,Y)))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[14,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(35,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y))) = inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,X),inverse(multiply(Z,Y)))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[7,30,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(37,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(multiply(multiply(Y,Z),U),inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(X)))))) = inverse(multiply(Y,U)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[23,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(38,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(U,inverse(multiply(multiply(U,X),inverse(Z))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[21,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(39,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(multiply(multiply(Y,Z),inverse(X)))))) = Z,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[11,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(42,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(X))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[6,35,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(43,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,Y),inverse(X))))),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[38,42,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(44,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(multiply(X,inverse(Y)))) = Y,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[39,43,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(47,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(X)) = Y,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[27,33,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(51,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(Y)) = X,
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[44,47,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(52,plain,
    multiply(X,inverse(Y)) = inverse(multiply(Y,inverse(X))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[47,44,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(53,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),inverse(inverse(multiply(multiply(Z,U),inverse(multiply(U,inverse(Y)))))))) = inverse(multiply(Z,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[37,31,52,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(55,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X)) = X,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[44,47,52,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(56,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),multiply(multiply(Z,U),inverse(multiply(U,inverse(Y)))))) = inverse(multiply(Z,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[53,55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(69,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = multiply(Y,X),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[51,47,theory(equality)]),55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(72,plain,
    multiply(c3,multiply(a3,b3)) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3,69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(90,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X),inverse(Y)) = inverse(multiply(Y,X)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[52,55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(140,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X,Y),inverse(multiply(Y,Z))) = inverse(multiply(Z,inverse(X))),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[42,69,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(141,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(X,inverse(Y)),multiply(Z,Y))) = inverse(multiply(Z,X)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[56,55,90,140,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(226,plain,
    multiply(X,Y) = multiply(multiply(Y,inverse(Z)),multiply(X,Z)),
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[55,141,theory(equality)]),55,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(227,plain,
    multiply(X,multiply(Y,Z)) = multiply(Z,multiply(X,Y)),
    inference('PARAMODULATE',[status(thm)],[226,47,theory(equality)]) ).

cnf(228,plain,
    $false,
    inference('REWRITE',[status(thm)],[72,227,theory(equality)]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GRP511-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : run-snark %s %d
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n014.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 01:35:52 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.20/0.46  /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.47  * 
% 0.20/0.48  #<PACKAGE "SNARK-USER">
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  SNARK-TPTP-OPTIONS
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ((AGENDA-LENGTH-LIMIT NIL) (AGENDA-LENGTH-BEFORE-SIMPLIFICATION-LIMIT NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-HYPERRESOLUTION T) (USE-UR-RESOLUTION T) (USE-PARAMODULATION T)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-FACTORING :POS)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-HYPERRESOLUTION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-LITERAL-ORDERING-WITH-PARAMODULATION 'LITERAL-ORDERING-P)
% 0.20/0.48   (ORDERING-FUNCTIONS>CONSTANTS T) (ASSERT-CONTEXT :CURRENT)
% 0.20/0.48   (RUN-TIME-LIMIT 300) (LISTEN-FOR-COMMANDS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-CLOSURE-WHEN-SATISFIABLE T) (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-GIVEN NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROWS-WHEN-DERIVED NIL) (PRINT-UNORIENTABLE-ROWS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-ROW-WFFS-PRETTILY NIL) (PRINT-FINAL-ROWS :TPTP)
% 0.20/0.48   (PRINT-OPTIONS-WHEN-STARTING NIL) (USE-VARIABLE-NAME-SORTS NIL)
% 0.20/0.48   (USE-PURITY-TEST T) (USE-RELEVANCE-TEST T) (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS1)
% 0.20/0.48   (DECLARE-TPTP-SYMBOLS2))
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  "."
% 0.20/0.48  * 
% 0.20/0.48  ; Begin refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T01:35:52
% 0.20/0.48  ; Running SNARK from /davis/home/graph/tptp/Systems/SNARK---20120808r022/Source/snark-system.lisp in SBCL 1.0.12 on n014.cluster.edu at 2022-06-14T01:35:52
% 0.45/0.62  
% 0.45/0.62  
% 0.45/0.62  #||
% 0.45/0.62  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.45/0.63  % SZS output start Refutation
% See solution above
% 0.45/0.63  ||#
% 0.45/0.63  
% 0.45/0.63  ; Summary of computation:
% 0.45/0.63  ;      1247 formulas have been input or derived (from 40 formulas).
% 0.45/0.63  ;       228 (18%) were retained.  Of these,
% 0.45/0.63  ;           98 (43%) were simplified or subsumed later,
% 0.45/0.63  ;          130 (57%) are still being kept.
% 0.45/0.63  ; 
% 0.45/0.63  ; Run time in seconds excluding printing time:
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.001   1%   Read assertion file          (1 call)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.000   0%   Assert                       (2 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.025  17%   Process new row              (1,121 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.001   1%   Resolution                   (78 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.020  14%   Paramodulation               (39 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.028  19%   Forward simplification       (997 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.012   8%   Backward simplification      (228 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.033  22%   Ordering                     (6,076 calls)
% 0.45/0.63  ;     0.001   1%   Sortal reasoning             (32 calls)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.001   1%   Purity testing               (1 call)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.025  17%   Other
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.147        Total
% 0.47/0.63  ;     0.150        Real time
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; Term-hash-array has 721 terms in all.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 0 entries (0 at peak, 0 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Feature-vector-row-index has 1 node (1 at peak, 1 added, 0 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 394 entries (417 at peak, 802 added, 408 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Path-index has 866 nodes (888 at peak, 1,199 added, 333 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 394 entries (417 at peak, 802 added, 408 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Trie-index has 1,271 nodes (1,368 at peak, 2,981 added, 1,710 deleted).
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 4,451 generalization terms in 6,477 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 1,603 instance terms in 340 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; Retrieved 3,231 unifiable terms in 282 calls.
% 0.47/0.63  ; 
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of backward simplifiable rows to process has 9 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     9 with value 0
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to process has 63 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     2 with value 20              5 with value 24               5 with value 28
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value 21              9 with value 25               6 with value 29
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value 22             15 with value 26               3 with value 30
% 0.47/0.63  ;    12 with value 23              4 with value 27
% 0.47/0.63  ; The agenda of rows to give has 104 entries:
% 0.47/0.63  ;     1 with value (4 19)         15 with value (4 25)           2 with value (4 29)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     5 with value (4 22)         23 with value (4 26)           1 with value (4 30)
% 0.47/0.63  ;     2 with value (4 23)          8 with value (4 27)           1 with value (4 32)
% 0.47/0.63  ;    13 with value (4 24)         32 with value (4 28)           1 with value (4 36)
% 0.47/0.63  Evaluation took:
% 0.47/0.63    0.15 seconds of real time
% 0.47/0.63    0.128292 seconds of user run time
% 0.47/0.63    0.022423 seconds of system run time
% 0.47/0.63    0 calls to %EVAL
% 0.47/0.63    0 page faults and
% 0.47/0.63    11,486,040 bytes consed.
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  ; End refute-file /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 2022-06-14T01:35:52
% 0.47/0.63  :PROOF-FOUND
% 0.47/0.63  * 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------