TSTP Solution File: GRP498-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : GRP498-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:52:27 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.50s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :   22
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   51 (  51 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   51 (  50 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    5 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   4 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   81 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p',multiply) ).

cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p',inverse) ).

cnf(identity,axiom,
    identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p',identity) ).

cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,identity))),double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X3,X1)),identity)) = X3,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_3,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p',prove_these_axioms_3) ).

cnf(c_0_5,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = double_divide(double_divide(X2,X1),identity),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = double_divide(X1,identity),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_7,axiom,
    identity = double_divide(X1,inverse(X1)),
    identity ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    inverse(double_divide(X1,X2)) = multiply(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,identity))),double_divide(double_divide(X2,double_divide(X3,X1)),identity)) = X3,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),multiply(X2,X1)) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(identity,double_divide(X1,inverse(X2))),multiply(double_divide(X3,X1),X2)) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_6]),c_0_6]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,plain,
    inverse(identity) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = multiply(identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    double_divide(identity,multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_7]),c_0_6]),c_0_12]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    multiply(identity,inverse(X1)) = inverse(multiply(identity,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,plain,
    double_divide(identity,inverse(multiply(identity,X1))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_7]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    double_divide(identity,multiply(inverse(X1),identity)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    multiply(inverse(multiply(identity,X1)),identity) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_16]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    double_divide(identity,inverse(X1)) = multiply(identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_17,c_0_18]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,plain,
    multiply(identity,double_divide(X1,X2)) = inverse(multiply(X2,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    double_divide(identity,multiply(X1,X2)) = inverse(multiply(X1,X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_19,c_0_8]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,plain,
    inverse(multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_21]) ).

cnf(c_0_23,plain,
    multiply(identity,multiply(identity,X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_24,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2),X1) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_22]) ).

cnf(c_0_25,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X1),identity) = inverse(multiply(identity,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_26,plain,
    inverse(multiply(identity,multiply(X1,X2))) = double_divide(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_20]),c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_27,plain,
    multiply(double_divide(X1,X2),X2) = inverse(multiply(identity,X1)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_22,c_0_24]) ).

cnf(c_0_28,plain,
    multiply(multiply(identity,X1),identity) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_25,c_0_13]),c_0_15]),c_0_13]),c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_29,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X1)) = multiply(identity,X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_26,c_0_27]),c_0_15]),c_0_23]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_30,plain,
    multiply(X1,identity) = multiply(identity,X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_28,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_31,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(X1,X2),multiply(identity,X1)) = multiply(identity,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_29,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_32,plain,
    multiply(identity,multiply(X1,identity)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_23,c_0_30]) ).

cnf(c_0_33,plain,
    double_divide(identity,X1) = inverse(X1),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_21,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_34,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(multiply(X1,identity),X2),X1) = multiply(identity,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_32]) ).

cnf(c_0_35,plain,
    double_divide(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),multiply(double_divide(X3,X2),X1)) = X3,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_33]),c_0_8]) ).

cnf(c_0_36,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(identity,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_34,c_0_35]),c_0_6]) ).

cnf(c_0_37,plain,
    double_divide(double_divide(multiply(identity,X1),X2),X1) = multiply(identity,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_31,c_0_23]) ).

cnf(c_0_38,plain,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_33,c_0_36]),c_0_12]),c_0_23]),c_0_13]) ).

cnf(c_0_39,plain,
    inverse(multiply(multiply(identity,X1),X2)) = double_divide(multiply(identity,X2),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_37,c_0_29]),c_0_20]) ).

cnf(c_0_40,plain,
    multiply(multiply(identity,X1),double_divide(X1,X2)) = inverse(multiply(identity,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_27,c_0_29]) ).

cnf(c_0_41,plain,
    double_divide(X1,inverse(X2)) = multiply(inverse(X1),X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_36,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_42,plain,
    inverse(multiply(X1,X2)) = double_divide(X2,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_39,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_43,plain,
    multiply(X1,double_divide(X1,X2)) = inverse(X2),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_40,c_0_38]),c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_44,plain,
    double_divide(X1,double_divide(X2,X3)) = multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X3,X2)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_41,c_0_42]) ).

cnf(c_0_45,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_3]) ).

cnf(c_0_46,plain,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(X1),X2),X3) = multiply(inverse(X1),multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_43,c_0_35]),c_0_42]),c_0_44]) ).

cnf(c_0_47,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_38]) ).

cnf(c_0_48,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(a3,b3),c3) != multiply(a3,multiply(b3,c3)),
    c_0_45 ).

cnf(c_0_49,plain,
    multiply(multiply(X1,X2),X3) = multiply(X1,multiply(X2,X3)),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_46,c_0_47]) ).

cnf(c_0_50,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_48,c_0_49])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.04/0.13  % Problem    : GRP498-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.15/0.35  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.15/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.15/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.15/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.15/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.15/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:01:08 EDT 2024
% 0.15/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.48  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.21/0.48  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.wPA7EzkpbD/E---3.1_23795.p
% 0.21/0.50  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # sh5l with pid 23889 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with pid 23894 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Result found by H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.21/0.50  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.50  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.21/0.50  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 135s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.50  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.50  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.50  # Parsed axioms                        : 5
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses                      : 5
% 0.21/0.50  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 5
% 0.21/0.50  # Processed clauses                    : 173
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of these trivial                  : 74
% 0.21/0.50  # ...subsumed                          : 11
% 0.21/0.50  # ...remaining for further processing  : 88
% 0.21/0.50  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Backward-rewritten                   : 56
% 0.21/0.50  # Generated clauses                    : 1214
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 582
% 0.21/0.50  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Paramodulations                      : 1214
% 0.21/0.50  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2324
% 0.21/0.50  # ...of those cached                   : 2011
% 0.21/0.50  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of processed clauses  : 27
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 27
% 0.21/0.50  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.50  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 200
% 0.21/0.50  # ...number of literals in the above   : 200
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Current number of archived clauses   : 61
% 0.21/0.50  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 3
% 0.21/0.50  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 62
% 0.21/0.50  # BW rewrite match successes           : 44
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.50  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 10053
% 0.21/0.50  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.004 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.015 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1612 pages
% 0.21/0.50  
% 0.21/0.50  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.50  # User time                : 0.011 s
% 0.21/0.50  # System time              : 0.006 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Total time               : 0.017 s
% 0.21/0.50  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.21/0.50  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.21/0.50  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------