TSTP Solution File: GRP487-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : GRP487-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:46 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 225.98s 226.07s
% Output : Proof 225.98s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12 % Problem : GRP487-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.07/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n016.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 02:28:45 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 225.98/226.07 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 225.98/226.07 % SZS output start Proof
% 225.98/226.07 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(A, identity), double_divide(B, C))), B), identity)) = C
% 225.98/226.07 multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 225.98/226.07 identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 225.98/226.07 multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = identity ==> \bottom
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 This holds because
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 E:
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(A, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(A, identity), double_divide(B, C))), B), identity)) = C
% 225.98/226.07 f1(identity) = false__
% 225.98/226.07 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 225.98/226.07 identity = double_divide(A, inverse(A))
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(A) = double_divide(A, identity)
% 225.98/226.07 multiply(A, B) = double_divide(double_divide(B, A), identity)
% 225.98/226.07 G:
% 225.98/226.07 true__ = false__
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 This holds because
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(A, identity) -> inverse(A)
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(A, inverse(A)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(Y0, identity)), identity)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), double_divide(double_divide(Y0, identity), identity))), identity)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, X2), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), double_divide(X1, X2))), X1)))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, Y1), inverse(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), double_divide(identity, Y1))))))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(Y0), double_divide(Y1, Y2))), Y1))) -> Y2
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(Y1))), Y1))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(Y0))), Y1))) -> inverse(Y1)
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(Y0)))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), inverse(Y2))), Y2)))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), inverse(Y0)))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, double_divide(inverse(Y0), double_divide(identity, Y2)))))) -> Y2
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(Y0)))))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(Y0, multiply(double_divide(Y0, identity), double_divide(identity, identity))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(Y0, identity), identity)), identity), identity) -> inverse(Y0)
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), identity), double_divide(X1, X2))), X1), double_divide(X2, identity)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, identity), identity), identity)), Y0), double_divide(double_divide(Y0, identity), identity)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(inverse(identity)))), X1), inverse(inverse(X1))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(inverse(identity)))), inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), Y1))) -> inverse(Y1)
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, Y1))) -> inverse(Y1)
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))))), inverse(X0)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))), double_divide(X0, inverse(identity))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))), inverse(X0)) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))), inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(X0)))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))), inverse(double_divide(inverse(identity), double_divide(X0, inverse(identity))))) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 double_divide(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(inverse(identity))))), inverse(double_divide(identity, Y1))) -> inverse(Y1)
% 225.98/226.07 f1(identity) -> false__
% 225.98/226.07 f1(inverse(identity)) -> true__
% 225.98/226.07 false__ -> true__
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(X0)))) -> inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(X0))))
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(identity) -> identity
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(inverse(double_divide(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(Y0)))))), X1))) -> double_divide(Y0, inverse(inverse(X1)))
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(Y0))))))) -> inverse(Y0)
% 225.98/226.07 inverse(inverse(double_divide(identity, inverse(inverse(Y0))))) -> inverse(Y0)
% 225.98/226.07 multiply(A, B) -> inverse(double_divide(B, A))
% 225.98/226.07 with the LPO induced by
% 225.98/226.07 f1 > multiply > double_divide > inverse > identity > a1 > false__ > true__
% 225.98/226.07
% 225.98/226.07 % SZS output end Proof
% 225.98/226.07
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------