TSTP Solution File: GRP466-1 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP466-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LViUCfzLLM true

% Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:51:45 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 1.26s 0.77s
% Output   : Refutation 1.26s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem  : GRP466-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.LViUCfzLLM true
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n028.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Tue Aug 29 01:58:55 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.34  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.34  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.34  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.34  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.34  % Running in FO mode
% 0.20/0.62  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.20/0.62  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.20/0.62  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 1.18/0.73  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 1.26/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 1.26/0.77  % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 1.26/0.77  % BCE start: 3
% 1.26/0.77  % BCE eliminated: 0
% 1.26/0.77  % PE start: 3
% 1.26/0.77  logic: eq
% 1.26/0.77  % PE eliminated: 0
% 1.26/0.77  % done 5 iterations in 0.019s
% 1.26/0.77  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 1.26/0.77  % SZS output start Refutation
% 1.26/0.77  thf(a1_type, type, a1: $i).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(divide_type, type, divide: $i > $i > $i).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(b1_type, type, b1: $i).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(single_axiom, axiom,
% 1.26/0.77    (( divide @
% 1.26/0.77       ( divide @ A @ A ) @ 
% 1.26/0.77       ( divide @
% 1.26/0.77         B @ ( divide @ ( divide @ C @ ( divide @ D @ B ) ) @ ( inverse @ D ) ) ) ) =
% 1.26/0.77     ( C ))).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ 
% 1.26/0.77           (divide @ X2 @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ X3 @ X2)) @ (inverse @ X3))))
% 1.26/0.77           = (X0))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [single_axiom])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((divide @ (divide @ X1 @ X1) @ 
% 1.26/0.77           (divide @ X2 @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ X3 @ X2)) @ (inverse @ X3))))
% 1.26/0.77           = (X0))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [single_axiom])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((divide @ (divide @ X4 @ X4) @ 
% 1.26/0.77           (divide @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ X3 @ X2)) @ (inverse @ X3)) @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X2))))
% 1.26/0.77           = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i, X4 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((divide @ (divide @ X4 @ X4) @ 
% 1.26/0.77           (divide @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ (divide @ X0 @ (divide @ X3 @ X2)) @ (inverse @ X3)) @ 
% 1.26/0.77            (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X2))))
% 1.26/0.77           = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl0, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ X0) = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(prove_these_axioms_1, conjecture,
% 1.26/0.77    (( multiply @ ( inverse @ a1 ) @ a1 ) =
% 1.26/0.77     ( multiply @ ( inverse @ b1 ) @ b1 ))).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 1.26/0.77    (( multiply @ ( inverse @ a1 ) @ a1 ) !=
% 1.26/0.77     ( multiply @ ( inverse @ b1 ) @ b1 )),
% 1.26/0.77    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_these_axioms_1])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (((multiply @ (inverse @ a1) @ a1) != (multiply @ (inverse @ b1) @ b1))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(multiply, axiom,
% 1.26/0.77    (( multiply @ A @ B ) = ( divide @ A @ ( inverse @ B ) ))).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((multiply @ X0 @ X1) = (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X1)))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [multiply])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((multiply @ X0 @ X1) = (divide @ X0 @ (inverse @ X1)))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [multiply])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl3, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (((divide @ (inverse @ a1) @ (inverse @ a1))
% 1.26/0.77         != (divide @ (inverse @ b1) @ (inverse @ b1)))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 1.26/0.77                [zip_derived_cl2, zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl52, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i]:
% 1.26/0.77         ((divide @ (inverse @ a1) @ (inverse @ a1)) != (divide @ X0 @ X0))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl20, zip_derived_cl3])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl20, plain,
% 1.26/0.77      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]: ((divide @ X0 @ X0) = (divide @ X1 @ X1))),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('s_sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl5, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 1.26/0.77  thf(zip_derived_cl68, plain, ($false),
% 1.26/0.77      inference('simplify_reflect+', [status(thm)],
% 1.26/0.77                [zip_derived_cl52, zip_derived_cl20])).
% 1.26/0.77  
% 1.26/0.77  % SZS output end Refutation
% 1.26/0.77  
% 1.26/0.77  
% 1.26/0.77  % Terminating...
% 1.45/0.84  % Runner terminated.
% 1.68/0.85  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------