TSTP Solution File: GRP466-1 by Moca---0.1
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Moca---0.1
% Problem : GRP466-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : moca.sh %s
% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:39 EDT 2022
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.65s
% Output : Proof 0.46s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.11 % Problem : GRP466-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.12/0.12 % Command : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 600
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 09:39:07 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.33 % CPUTime :
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.46/0.65 The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(A, A), divide(B, divide(divide(C, divide(D, B)), inverse(D)))) = C
% 0.46/0.65 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, inverse(B))
% 0.46/0.65 multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = multiply(inverse(b1), b1) ==> \bottom
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 This holds because
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 E:
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(A, A), divide(B, divide(divide(C, divide(D, B)), inverse(D)))) = C
% 0.46/0.65 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(multiply(inverse(b1), b1)) = false__
% 0.46/0.65 multiply(A, B) = divide(A, inverse(B))
% 0.46/0.65 G:
% 0.46/0.65 true__ = false__
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 This holds because
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 divide(X4, X4) = divide(Y4, Y4)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(Y1, divide(divide(X1, X1), inverse(Y3)))) = divide(Y3, Y1)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(X2, inverse(Y2)), divide(divide(X0, X0), inverse(divide(divide(X2, divide(X3, Y2)), inverse(X3)))))) = divide(Y4, Y4)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(divide(X2, divide(X3, Y3)), inverse(X3)), divide(X2, inverse(Y3)))) = divide(X0, X0)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(divide(Y1, X2), inverse(divide(X0, X0))), divide(Y1, inverse(divide(X1, divide(divide(X2, divide(X3, X1)), inverse(X3))))))) = divide(Y4, Y4)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(divide(Y1, divide(X0, X0)), inverse(false__)), divide(Y1, inverse(false__)))) = divide(Y4, Y4)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(false__, false__) = divide(X0, X0)
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(A, A), divide(B, divide(divide(C, divide(D, B)), inverse(D)))) -> C
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(Y1, divide(divide(Y2, divide(X1, X1)), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(X1, divide(divide(X2, divide(X3, X1)), inverse(X3))), divide(divide(Y2, X2), inverse(divide(X0, X0))))) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(divide(divide(divide(X1, divide(X2, X3)), inverse(X2)), divide(X1, inverse(X3))), divide(divide(Y2, divide(X4, X4)), inverse(divide(X0, X0))))) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65 divide(divide(Y0, Y0), divide(false__, divide(divide(Y2, divide(X0, X0)), inverse(false__)))) -> Y2
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(X0, X0)) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(X0, X0)) -> true__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(false__, false__)) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(false__, false__)) -> true__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(inverse(a1), inverse(a1))) -> true__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(divide(inverse(b1), inverse(b1))) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 0.46/0.65 f1(multiply(inverse(b1), b1)) -> false__
% 0.46/0.65 multiply(A, B) -> divide(A, inverse(B))
% 0.46/0.65 true__ -> false__
% 0.46/0.65 with the LPO induced by
% 0.46/0.65 a1 > b1 > f1 > multiply > inverse > divide > true__ > false__
% 0.46/0.65
% 0.46/0.65 % SZS output end Proof
% 0.46/0.65
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------