TSTP Solution File: GRP464-1 by Toma---0.4

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Toma---0.4
% Problem  : GRP464-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : toma --casc %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:15:04 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.41s 0.61s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.41s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.08/0.14  % Problem    : GRP464-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.08/0.14  % Command    : toma --casc %s
% 0.14/0.36  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.36  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.36  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.36  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.36  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.14/0.36  % DateTime   : Tue Aug 29 01:08:51 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.36  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.41/0.61  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.41/0.61  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.41/0.61  original problem:
% 0.41/0.61  axioms:
% 0.41/0.61  divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity(), A), C))) = B
% 0.41/0.61  multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(identity(), B))
% 0.41/0.61  inverse(A) = divide(identity(), A)
% 0.41/0.61  identity() = divide(A, A)
% 0.41/0.61  goal:
% 0.41/0.61  multiply(identity(), a2()) != a2()
% 0.41/0.61  To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.41/0.61  it suffices to show that multiply(identity(), a2()) = a2() (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.41/0.61  Here is an equational proof:
% 0.41/0.61  0: divide(X0, divide(divide(divide(divide(X0, X0), X1), X2), divide(divide(identity(), X0), X2))) = X1.
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  1: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, divide(identity(), X1)).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  2: inverse(X0) = divide(identity(), X0).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  3: identity() = divide(X0, X0).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Axiom.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  4: divide(X0, divide(divide(inverse(X1), X2), divide(inverse(X0), X2))) = X1.
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 0,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations [3,2,2]
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  5: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, inverse(X1)).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 1,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations []
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  6: inverse(identity()) = identity().
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: A critical pair between equations 2 and 3.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  7: X1 = divide(X1, identity()).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: A critical pair between equations 4 and 3.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  10: X1 = inverse(divide(divide(inverse(X1), X2), divide(inverse(identity()), X2))).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: A critical pair between equations 4 and 2.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  15: X1 = divide(identity(), divide(divide(divide(identity(), X1), X2), divide(identity(), X2))).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 10,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations []
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [2,6,2].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  18: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, divide(identity(), X1)).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 5,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations []
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  22: X1 = divide(identity(), divide(divide(divide(identity(), X1), identity()), identity())).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: A critical pair between equations 15 and 7.
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  40: X1 = inverse(inverse(X1)).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 22,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations []
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [2,7,7,2].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  42: multiply(X0, X1) = divide(X0, inverse(X1)).
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite equation 18,
% 0.41/0.61                 lhs with equations []
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [2].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  49: multiply(identity(), a2()) = a2().
% 0.41/0.61  Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [42,2,40]
% 0.41/0.61                 rhs with equations [].
% 0.41/0.61  
% 0.41/0.61  % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------