TSTP Solution File: GRP463-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP463-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:37 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.38s
% Output   : Proof 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.03/0.12  % Problem  : GRP463-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.03/0.12  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.12/0.33  % Computer : n006.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.12/0.33  % DateTime : Tue Jun 14 03:19:26 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output start Proof
% 0.19/0.38  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) = B
% 0.19/0.38  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(identity, B))
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(A) = divide(identity, A)
% 0.19/0.38  	identity = divide(A, A)
% 0.19/0.38  	multiply(inverse(a1), a1) = identity ==> \bottom
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  This holds because
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  E:
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) = B
% 0.19/0.38  	f1(identity) = false__
% 0.19/0.38  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) = true__
% 0.19/0.38  	identity = divide(A, A)
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(A) = divide(identity, A)
% 0.19/0.38  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(identity, B))
% 0.19/0.38  G:
% 0.19/0.38  	true__ = false__
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  This holds because
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(A, A) -> identity
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(A, A), B), C), divide(divide(identity, A), C))) -> B
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), inverse(Y0)), identity)) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, divide(inverse(Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> identity
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), identity)) -> identity
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), identity))) -> identity
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(Y1, identity) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(identity, A) -> inverse(A)
% 0.19/0.38  	divide(inverse(inverse(Y0)), inverse(X1)) -> divide(Y0, inverse(X1))
% 0.19/0.38  	f1(identity) -> false__
% 0.19/0.38  	f1(multiply(inverse(a1), a1)) -> true__
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(divide(divide(divide(inverse(identity), Y1), Y2), inverse(Y2))) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y0), identity), identity)) -> Y0
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), inverse(Y2))) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(identity) -> identity
% 0.19/0.38  	inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 0.19/0.38  	multiply(A, B) -> divide(A, divide(identity, B))
% 0.19/0.38  	true__ -> false__
% 0.19/0.38  with the LPO induced by
% 0.19/0.38  	a1 > f1 > multiply > divide > identity > inverse > true__ > false__
% 0.19/0.38  
% 0.19/0.38  % SZS output end Proof
% 0.19/0.38  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------