TSTP Solution File: GRP449-1 by Moca---0.1

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Moca---0.1
% Problem  : GRP449-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : moca.sh %s

% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 10:55:31 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 6.00s 6.16s
% Output   : Proof 6.00s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12  % Problem  : GRP449-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.14/0.13  % Command  : moca.sh %s
% 0.14/0.34  % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.34  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.34  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.14/0.34  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 07:46:24 EDT 2022
% 0.14/0.34  % CPUTime  : 
% 6.00/6.16  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 6.00/6.16  % SZS output start Proof
% 6.00/6.16  The input problem is unsatisfiable because
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  [1] the following set of Horn clauses is unsatisfiable:
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(B, B), B), C), divide(divide(divide(B, B), A), C))) = B
% 6.00/6.16  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 6.00/6.16  	multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2) = a2 ==> \bottom
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  This holds because
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  [2] the following E entails the following G (Claessen-Smallbone's transformation (2018)):
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  E:
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(B, B), B), C), divide(divide(divide(B, B), A), C))) = B
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(a2) = false__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)) = true__
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(A) = divide(divide(B, B), A)
% 6.00/6.16  	multiply(A, B) = divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B))
% 6.00/6.16  G:
% 6.00/6.16  	true__ = false__
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  This holds because
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  [3] E entails the following ordered TRS and the lhs and rhs of G join by the TRS:
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(A, divide(divide(C, C), B)) -> multiply(A, B)
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(A, divide(divide(divide(divide(B, B), B), C), divide(divide(divide(B, B), A), C))) -> B
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(X0, X0) -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(X1, divide(inverse(Y0), divide(divide(inverse(X1), X2), divide(inverse(inverse(Y1)), X2))))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(Y1, divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(Y3)), inverse(Y1)))))) -> Y3
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(divide(X0, Y2), divide(divide(g2, Y0), Y2))) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(Y0), Y2))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(divide(g1, Y0), divide(g1, Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0))) -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, divide(g2, divide(divide(g2, Y0), X0))) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), divide(inverse(Y2), divide(inverse(inverse(Y3)), Y2))))) -> Y3
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y0, inverse(divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(Y1, g1) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(X0, X1), divide(g2, X1)) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, X0))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(Y0, divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))), X0) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, Y0))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0)), g1), g1) -> Y0
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(divide(g2, X0), X1), divide(g2, X1)) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(divide(g2, X0), divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X1)))), X1) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0))), divide(divide(Y1, Y2), divide(X0, Y2))) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, Y1)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, Y0))), divide(g2, divide(Y0, X0))) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g1, divide(divide(divide(g1, Y0), g1), g1)) -> Y0
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g1, divide(g1, Y0)) -> Y0
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(divide(Y0, g1), g1))) -> Y0
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, divide(g1, Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g2, A) -> divide(g1, A)
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g2, divide(divide(X0, Y1), divide(g2, Y1))) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g2, divide(divide(Y0, divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, X0)))), X0)) -> divide(g2, divide(g2, divide(g2, Y0)))
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(g2, inverse(divide(g2, divide(inverse(Y1), divide(inverse(inverse(Y2)), Y1))))) -> Y2
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X0))), divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(X0, Y2))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X0))), inverse(divide(X0, inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(a2) -> false__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(divide(divide(a2, false__), divide(g1, false__))) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(divide(divide(a2, g1), g1)) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(divide(g1, divide(g1, a2))) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(inverse(inverse(a2))) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(multiply(multiply(divide(g1, b2), b2), a2)) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	f1(multiply(multiply(inverse(b2), b2), a2)) -> true__
% 6.00/6.16  	g2 -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(Y1) -> divide(g2, Y1)
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(Y0, Y0)) -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(Y0, inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y0), Y1), divide(g2, Y1))))) -> g2
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(Y1, inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(inverse(Y3)), Y2))))) -> Y3
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y0), inverse(inverse(inverse(X0)))), X0)) -> Y0
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), divide(inverse(divide(X0, X0)), Y2))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(divide(inverse(Y1), Y2), inverse(Y2))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(g2, inverse(divide(divide(g2, Y1), divide(inverse(inverse(Y2)), Y1))))) -> Y2
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(X0))), inverse(divide(divide(X0, Y1), divide(inverse(inverse(Y2)), Y1))))) -> Y2
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(inverse(Y0)) -> divide(divide(Y0, g2), g2)
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(inverse(divide(X0, X0))) -> g2
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(inverse(divide(Y0, Y0))) -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(inverse(divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X0, X0))), inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	inverse(inverse(inverse(inverse(Y1)))) -> Y1
% 6.00/6.16  	multiply(g1, g1) -> g1
% 6.00/6.16  	true__ -> false__
% 6.00/6.16  with the LPO induced by
% 6.00/6.16  	f1 > b2 > inverse > divide > g2 > g1 > multiply > a2 > true__ > false__
% 6.00/6.16  
% 6.00/6.16  % SZS output end Proof
% 6.00/6.16  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------