TSTP Solution File: GRP446-1 by E---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E---3.1.00
% Problem  : GRP446-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:52:18 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.13s 0.41s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.13s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    9
%            Number of leaves      :    4
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   23 (  23 unt;   0 nHn;   5 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   23 (  22 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    6 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    5 (   5 usr;   2 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   39 (   0 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(inverse,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zW2N5HXWMI/E---3.1_27252.p',inverse) ).

cnf(single_axiom,axiom,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X2),X3),divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3))) = X2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zW2N5HXWMI/E---3.1_27252.p',single_axiom) ).

cnf(prove_these_axioms_2,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zW2N5HXWMI/E---3.1_27252.p',prove_these_axioms_2) ).

cnf(multiply,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zW2N5HXWMI/E---3.1_27252.p',multiply) ).

cnf(c_0_4,axiom,
    inverse(X1) = divide(divide(X2,X2),X1),
    inverse ).

cnf(c_0_5,plain,
    divide(inverse(divide(X1,X1)),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_6,axiom,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X2),X3),divide(divide(divide(X1,X1),X1),X3))) = X2,
    single_axiom ).

cnf(c_0_7,plain,
    divide(inverse(inverse(divide(X1,X1))),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_4,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_8,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(divide(inverse(X2),X3),divide(inverse(X1),X3))) = X2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_6,c_0_4]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,plain,
    divide(inverse(inverse(inverse(divide(X1,X1)))),X2) = inverse(X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_5,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_10,plain,
    inverse(divide(divide(inverse(X1),X2),inverse(X2))) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_7,c_0_8]),c_0_9]) ).

cnf(c_0_11,plain,
    inverse(divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X1))) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_5]) ).

cnf(c_0_12,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_these_axioms_2]) ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,divide(divide(X3,X3),X2)),
    multiply ).

cnf(c_0_14,plain,
    divide(X1,X1) = divide(X2,X2),
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_15,plain,
    divide(X1,inverse(divide(inverse(X1),inverse(X2)))) = X2,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_8,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    multiply(multiply(inverse(b2),b2),a2) != a2,
    c_0_12 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    multiply(X1,X2) = divide(X1,inverse(X2)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_13,c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    inverse(divide(b2,b2)) = divide(X1,X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_11,c_0_14]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,plain,
    divide(X1,divide(X2,X2)) = X1,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_15,c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    inverse(inverse(a2)) != a2,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_17]),c_0_4]) ).

cnf(c_0_21,plain,
    inverse(inverse(X1)) = X1,
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_10,c_0_18]),c_0_19]),c_0_19]) ).

cnf(c_0_22,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_20,c_0_21])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.02/0.09  % Problem    : GRP446-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.6.0.
% 0.02/0.10  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.09/0.29  % Computer : n003.cluster.edu
% 0.09/0.29  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.09/0.29  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.09/0.29  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.09/0.29  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.09/0.29  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:15:52 EDT 2024
% 0.09/0.29  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.13/0.40  Running first-order theorem proving
% 0.13/0.40  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --auto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.zW2N5HXWMI/E---3.1_27252.p
% 0.13/0.41  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # sh5l with pid 27347 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Result found by sh5l
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.41  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 27353 completed with status 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Result found by U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing class: FSSSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting G-E--_302_C18_F1_URBAN_RG_S04BN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # SinE strategy is gf500_gu_R04_F100_L20000
% 0.13/0.41  # Search class: FUUPS-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.13/0.41  # Scheduled 6 strats onto 1 cores with 300 seconds (300 total)
% 0.13/0.41  # Starting U----_116XG_C05_02_F1_SE_PI_CS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 163s (1) cores
% 0.13/0.41  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # Proof found!
% 0.13/0.41  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.13/0.41  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.13/0.41  # Parsed axioms                        : 4
% 0.13/0.41  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Initial clauses                      : 4
% 0.13/0.41  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 4
% 0.13/0.41  # Processed clauses                    : 43
% 0.13/0.41  # ...of these trivial                  : 17
% 0.13/0.41  # ...subsumed                          : 4
% 0.13/0.41  # ...remaining for further processing  : 22
% 0.13/0.41  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Backward-rewritten                   : 8
% 0.13/0.41  # Generated clauses                    : 212
% 0.13/0.41  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 155
% 0.13/0.41  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Paramodulations                      : 212
% 0.13/0.41  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Total rewrite steps                  : 143
% 0.13/0.41  # ...of those cached                   : 62
% 0.13/0.41  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of processed clauses  : 10
% 0.13/0.41  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 8
% 0.13/0.41  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 2
% 0.13/0.41  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.13/0.41  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 116
% 0.13/0.41  # ...number of literals in the above   : 116
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Current number of archived clauses   : 12
% 0.13/0.41  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 12
% 0.13/0.41  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 67
% 0.13/0.41  # BW rewrite match successes           : 18
% 0.13/0.41  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.13/0.41  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 1774
% 0.13/0.41  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  # User time                : 0.003 s
% 0.13/0.41  # System time              : 0.001 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Total time               : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1608 pages
% 0.13/0.41  
% 0.13/0.41  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.13/0.41  # User time                : 0.004 s
% 0.13/0.41  # System time              : 0.002 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Total time               : 0.006 s
% 0.13/0.41  # Maximum resident set size: 1684 pages
% 0.13/0.41  % E---3.1 exiting
% 0.13/0.41  % E exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------