TSTP Solution File: GRP206-1 by Toma---0.4
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Toma---0.4
% Problem : GRP206-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% Transfm : none
% Format : tptp:raw
% Command : toma --casc %s
% Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:14:26 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.50s 0.75s
% Output : CNFRefutation 0.50s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.11/0.12 % Problem : GRP206-1 : TPTP v8.1.2. Released v2.3.0.
% 0.11/0.13 % Command : toma --casc %s
% 0.12/0.33 % Computer : n007.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.33 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.33 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.33 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.33 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.12/0.33 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:37:58 EDT 2023
% 0.12/0.34 % CPUTime :
% 0.50/0.75 % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.50/0.75 % SZS output start Proof
% 0.50/0.75 original problem:
% 0.50/0.75 axioms:
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(identity(), X) = X
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(X, identity()) = X
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(X, left_division(X, Y)) = Y
% 0.50/0.75 left_division(X, multiply(X, Y)) = Y
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(right_division(X, Y), Y) = X
% 0.50/0.75 right_division(multiply(X, Y), Y) = X
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(X, right_inverse(X)) = identity()
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(left_inverse(X), X) = identity()
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(X, multiply(multiply(Y, Z), X)) = multiply(multiply(X, Y), multiply(Z, X))
% 0.50/0.75 goal:
% 0.50/0.75 multiply(multiply(a(), multiply(b(), c())), a()) != multiply(multiply(a(), b()), multiply(c(), a()))
% 0.50/0.75 To show the unsatisfiability of the original goal,
% 0.50/0.75 it suffices to show that multiply(multiply(a(), multiply(b(), c())), a()) = multiply(multiply(a(), b()), multiply(c(), a())) (skolemized goal) is valid under the axioms.
% 0.50/0.75 Here is an equational proof:
% 0.50/0.75 0: multiply(identity(), X0) = X0.
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 1: multiply(X0, identity()) = X0.
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 8: multiply(X0, multiply(multiply(X1, X2), X0)) = multiply(multiply(X0, X1), multiply(X2, X0)).
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: Axiom.
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 21: multiply(multiply(X0, X3), multiply(identity(), X0)) = multiply(X0, multiply(X3, X0)).
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: A critical pair between equations 8 and 1.
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 33: multiply(multiply(X0, X3), X0) = multiply(X0, multiply(X3, X0)).
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: Rewrite equation 21,
% 0.50/0.75 lhs with equations [0]
% 0.50/0.75 rhs with equations [].
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 34: multiply(multiply(a(), multiply(b(), c())), a()) = multiply(multiply(a(), b()), multiply(c(), a())).
% 0.50/0.75 Proof: Rewrite lhs with equations [33,8]
% 0.50/0.75 rhs with equations [].
% 0.50/0.75
% 0.50/0.75 % SZS output end Proof
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------