TSTP Solution File: GRP191-2 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem  : GRP191-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : NO INFORMATION
% Format   : NO INFORMATION
% Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TPpkksYD34 true

% Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:39 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 16.12s 2.96s
% Output   : Refutation 16.12s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.12/0.12  % Problem  : GRP191-2 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.12/0.14  % Command  : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox2/tmp/tmp.TPpkksYD34 true
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n020.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 23:38:58 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.14/0.35  % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.14/0.35  % File         : /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.14/0.35  % Number of cores: 8
% 0.14/0.35  % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.14/0.36  % Running in FO mode
% 0.21/0.66  % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.21/0.66  % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.55/0.71  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.72  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.74  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.55/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.55/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.55/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.58/0.76  % /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 16.12/2.96  % Solved by fo/fo5.sh.
% 16.12/2.96  % done 1549 iterations in 2.169s
% 16.12/2.96  % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 16.12/2.96  % SZS output start Refutation
% 16.12/2.96  thf(b_type, type, b: $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(least_upper_bound_type, type, least_upper_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(identity_type, type, identity: $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(multiply_type, type, multiply: $i > $i > $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(greatest_lower_bound_type, type, greatest_lower_bound: $i > $i > $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(inverse_type, type, inverse: $i > $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(a_type, type, a: $i).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(p39d_1, axiom, (( greatest_lower_bound @ a @ b ) = ( b ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15, plain, (((greatest_lower_bound @ a @ b) = (b))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [p39d_1])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(lub_absorbtion, axiom,
% 16.12/2.96    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ ( greatest_lower_bound @ X @ Y ) ) = ( X ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((least_upper_bound @ X0 @ (greatest_lower_bound @ X0 @ X1)) = (X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [lub_absorbtion])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl18, plain, (((least_upper_bound @ a @ b) = (a))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(left_inverse, axiom, (( multiply @ ( inverse @ X ) @ X ) = ( identity ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(associativity, axiom,
% 16.12/2.96    (( multiply @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ Z ) =
% 16.12/2.96     ( multiply @ X @ ( multiply @ Y @ Z ) ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ X2)
% 16.12/2.96           = (multiply @ X0 @ (multiply @ X1 @ X2)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [associativity])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl26, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ identity @ X0)
% 16.12/2.96           = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(left_identity, axiom, (( multiply @ identity @ X ) = ( X ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl0, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ identity @ X0) = (X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_identity])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) @ identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl31, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ X1 @ X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X1)) @ X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl28, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl274, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl31])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl34, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)) @ identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl28])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl300, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((X0) = (inverse @ (inverse @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl274, zip_derived_cl34])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ (inverse @ X0) @ X0) = (identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [left_inverse])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl311, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ (inverse @ X0)) = (identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl300, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(monotony_lub2, axiom,
% 16.12/2.96    (( multiply @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) @ X ) =
% 16.12/2.96     ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ Y @ X ) @ ( multiply @ Z @ X ) ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl13, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X2) @ X1)
% 16.12/2.96           = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X2 @ X1)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub2])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl319, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1) @ (inverse @ X0))
% 16.12/2.96           = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ X1 @ (inverse @ X0))))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl311, zip_derived_cl13])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15764, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (((multiply @ a @ (inverse @ a))
% 16.12/2.96         = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ b @ (inverse @ a))))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl18, zip_derived_cl319])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl311, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ (inverse @ X0)) = (identity))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl300, zip_derived_cl1])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15813, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (((identity)
% 16.12/2.96         = (least_upper_bound @ identity @ (multiply @ b @ (inverse @ a))))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 16.12/2.96                [zip_derived_cl15764, zip_derived_cl311])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl28, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((X0) = (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl26, zip_derived_cl0])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(monotony_lub1, axiom,
% 16.12/2.96    (( multiply @ X @ ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ Z ) ) =
% 16.12/2.96     ( least_upper_bound @ ( multiply @ X @ Y ) @ ( multiply @ X @ Z ) ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ X0 @ (least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X2))
% 16.12/2.96           = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ X0 @ X1) @ (multiply @ X0 @ X2)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [monotony_lub1])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl85, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ 
% 16.12/2.96           (least_upper_bound @ X2 @ (multiply @ X1 @ X0)))
% 16.12/2.96           = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ (inverse @ X1) @ X2) @ X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl28, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15874, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (((multiply @ (inverse @ b) @ identity)
% 16.12/2.96         = (least_upper_bound @ (multiply @ (inverse @ b) @ identity) @ 
% 16.12/2.96            (inverse @ a)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl15813, zip_derived_cl85])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl274, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl31])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl274, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i]: ((multiply @ X0 @ identity) = (X0))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('sup+', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl34, zip_derived_cl31])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(symmetry_of_lub, axiom,
% 16.12/2.96    (( least_upper_bound @ X @ Y ) = ( least_upper_bound @ Y @ X ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 16.12/2.96         ((least_upper_bound @ X1 @ X0) = (least_upper_bound @ X0 @ X1))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [symmetry_of_lub])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15891, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (((inverse @ b) = (least_upper_bound @ (inverse @ a) @ (inverse @ b)))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('demod', [status(thm)],
% 16.12/2.96                [zip_derived_cl15874, zip_derived_cl274, zip_derived_cl274, 
% 16.12/2.96                 zip_derived_cl4])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(prove_p39d, conjecture,
% 16.12/2.96    (( least_upper_bound @ ( inverse @ a ) @ ( inverse @ b ) ) =
% 16.12/2.96     ( inverse @ b ))).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 16.12/2.96    (( least_upper_bound @ ( inverse @ a ) @ ( inverse @ b ) ) !=
% 16.12/2.96     ( inverse @ b )),
% 16.12/2.96    inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [prove_p39d])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 16.12/2.96      (((least_upper_bound @ (inverse @ a) @ (inverse @ b)) != (inverse @ b))),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 16.12/2.96  thf(zip_derived_cl15892, plain, ($false),
% 16.12/2.96      inference('simplify_reflect-', [status(thm)],
% 16.12/2.96                [zip_derived_cl15891, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 16.12/2.96  
% 16.12/2.96  % SZS output end Refutation
% 16.12/2.96  
% 16.12/2.96  
% 16.12/2.96  % Terminating...
% 17.16/3.08  % Runner terminated.
% 17.16/3.09  % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------