TSTP Solution File: GRP186-4 by Beagle---0.9.51

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : Beagle---0.9.51
% Problem  : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s

% Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Tue Aug 22 10:40:25 EDT 2023

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 34.95s 24.43s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 34.95s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   12
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   22 (  15 unt;   7 typ;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   15 (  14 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    3 (   3   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of types       :    1 (   0 usr)
%            Number of type conns  :    7 (   4   >;   3   *;   0   +;   0  <<)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   19 (;  19   !;   0   ?;   0   :)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%$ multiply > least_upper_bound > greatest_lower_bound > #nlpp > inverse > identity > b > a

%Foreground sorts:

%Background operators:

%Foreground operators:
tff(a,type,
    a: $i ).

tff(inverse,type,
    inverse: $i > $i ).

tff(greatest_lower_bound,type,
    greatest_lower_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(least_upper_bound,type,
    least_upper_bound: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(multiply,type,
    multiply: ( $i * $i ) > $i ).

tff(b,type,
    b: $i ).

tff(identity,type,
    identity: $i ).

tff(f_91,axiom,
    ! [X,Y] : ( least_upper_bound(X,Y) = least_upper_bound(Y,X) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_117,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( inverse(inverse(X)) = X ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_60,axiom,
    ! [X] : ( multiply(inverse(X),X) = identity ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_106,axiom,
    ! [X,Y,Z] : ( multiply(X,least_upper_bound(Y,Z)) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X,Y),multiply(X,Z)) ),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(f_121,axiom,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity) != multiply(a,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),b)),
    file(unknown,unknown) ).

tff(c_10,plain,
    ! [Y_9,X_8] : ( least_upper_bound(Y_9,X_8) = least_upper_bound(X_8,Y_9) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_91]) ).

tff(c_34,plain,
    ! [X_34] : ( inverse(inverse(X_34)) = X_34 ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_117]) ).

tff(c_92,plain,
    ! [X_41] : ( multiply(inverse(X_41),X_41) = identity ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_60]) ).

tff(c_99,plain,
    ! [X_34] : ( multiply(X_34,inverse(X_34)) = identity ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_34,c_92]) ).

tff(c_1621,plain,
    ! [X_93,Y_94,Z_95] : ( least_upper_bound(multiply(X_93,Y_94),multiply(X_93,Z_95)) = multiply(X_93,least_upper_bound(Y_94,Z_95)) ),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_106]) ).

tff(c_1712,plain,
    ! [X_34,Y_94] : ( multiply(X_34,least_upper_bound(Y_94,inverse(X_34))) = least_upper_bound(multiply(X_34,Y_94),identity) ),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_99,c_1621]) ).

tff(c_1740,plain,
    ! [X_34,Y_94] : ( multiply(X_34,least_upper_bound(Y_94,inverse(X_34))) = least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(X_34,Y_94)) ),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_1712]) ).

tff(c_38,plain,
    multiply(a,least_upper_bound(inverse(a),b)) != least_upper_bound(multiply(a,b),identity),
    inference(cnfTransformation,[status(thm)],[f_121]) ).

tff(c_39,plain,
    multiply(a,least_upper_bound(b,inverse(a))) != least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(a,b)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_10,c_10,c_38]) ).

tff(c_162646,plain,
    $false,
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm),theory(equality)],[c_1740,c_39]) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.13  % Problem  : GRP186-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.14/0.14  % Command  : java -Dfile.encoding=UTF-8 -Xms512M -Xmx4G -Xss10M -jar /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/beagle.jar -auto -q -proof -print tff -smtsolver /export/starexec/sandbox2/solver/bin/cvc4-1.4-x86_64-linux-opt -liasolver cooper -t %d %s
% 0.14/0.35  % Computer : n008.cluster.edu
% 0.14/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.14/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.14/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.14/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.14/0.35  % DateTime : Thu Aug  3 22:01:49 EDT 2023
% 0.14/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 34.95/24.43  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 34.95/24.43  
% 34.95/24.43  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for /export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 34.95/24.46  
% 34.95/24.46  Inference rules
% 34.95/24.46  ----------------------
% 34.95/24.46  #Ref     : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Sup     : 41522
% 34.95/24.46  #Fact    : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Define  : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Split   : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Chain   : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Close   : 0
% 34.95/24.46  
% 34.95/24.46  Ordering : KBO
% 34.95/24.46  
% 34.95/24.46  Simplification rules
% 34.95/24.46  ----------------------
% 34.95/24.46  #Subsume      : 883
% 34.95/24.46  #Demod        : 50623
% 34.95/24.46  #Tautology    : 20237
% 34.95/24.46  #SimpNegUnit  : 0
% 34.95/24.46  #BackRed      : 18
% 34.95/24.46  
% 34.95/24.46  #Partial instantiations: 0
% 34.95/24.46  #Strategies tried      : 1
% 34.95/24.46  
% 34.95/24.46  Timing (in seconds)
% 34.95/24.46  ----------------------
% 34.95/24.46  Preprocessing        : 0.46
% 34.95/24.46  Parsing              : 0.24
% 34.95/24.46  CNF conversion       : 0.02
% 34.95/24.46  Main loop            : 23.01
% 34.95/24.46  Inferencing          : 2.49
% 34.95/24.46  Reduction            : 14.91
% 34.95/24.46  Demodulation         : 13.96
% 34.95/24.46  BG Simplification    : 0.33
% 34.95/24.46  Subsumption          : 4.17
% 34.95/24.46  Abstraction          : 0.60
% 34.95/24.46  MUC search           : 0.00
% 34.95/24.46  Cooper               : 0.00
% 34.95/24.46  Total                : 23.51
% 34.95/24.46  Index Insertion      : 0.00
% 34.95/24.46  Index Deletion       : 0.00
% 34.95/24.46  Index Matching       : 0.00
% 34.95/24.46  BG Taut test         : 0.00
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------