TSTP Solution File: GRP175-4 by iProver---3.9

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : iProver---3.9
% Problem  : GRP175-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM

% Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Fri May  3 02:21:35 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 3.78s 1.12s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 3.78s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    5
%            Number of leaves      :   11
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   20 (  20 unt;   0 nHn;   8 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   20 (  19 equ;   4 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   26 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(c_49,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,b) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',p06d_1) ).

cnf(c_50,negated_conjecture,
    least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_p06d) ).

cnf(c_51,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(c_52,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X0,X1) = least_upper_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',symmetry_of_lub) ).

cnf(c_53,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_glb) ).

cnf(c_54,plain,
    least_upper_bound(least_upper_bound(X0,X1),X2) = least_upper_bound(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',associativity_of_lub) ).

cnf(c_57,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1)) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',lub_absorbtion) ).

cnf(c_59,plain,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X0,X2)) = multiply(X0,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub1) ).

cnf(c_61,plain,
    least_upper_bound(multiply(X0,X1),multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(X0,X2),X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-2.ax',monotony_lub2) ).

cnf(c_63,plain,
    multiply(identity,X0) = X0,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_identity) ).

cnf(c_64,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X0),X0) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/Axioms/GRP004-0.ax',left_inverse) ).

cnf(c_201,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0)) = X0,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_51,c_57]) ).

cnf(c_242,plain,
    multiply(inverse(X0),least_upper_bound(X0,X1)) = least_upper_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X0),X1)),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_64,c_59]) ).

cnf(c_254,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a),least_upper_bound(a,multiply(b,a))) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_50,c_242]) ).

cnf(c_263,plain,
    least_upper_bound(b,identity) = b,
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_49,c_201]) ).

cnf(c_272,plain,
    least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
    inference(theory_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_263,c_53,c_51,c_54,c_52]) ).

cnf(c_340,plain,
    least_upper_bound(X0,multiply(X1,X0)) = multiply(least_upper_bound(identity,X1),X0),
    inference(superposition,[status(thm)],[c_63,c_61]) ).

cnf(c_359,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a),multiply(least_upper_bound(identity,b),a)) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    inference(demodulation,[status(thm)],[c_254,c_340]) ).

cnf(c_360,plain,
    multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)) != multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a)),
    inference(light_normalisation,[status(thm)],[c_359,c_272]) ).

cnf(c_361,plain,
    $false,
    inference(equality_resolution_simp,[status(thm)],[c_360]) ).


%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.06/0.10  % Problem  : GRP175-4 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.06/0.11  % Command  : run_iprover %s %d THM
% 0.11/0.31  % Computer : n019.cluster.edu
% 0.11/0.31  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.11/0.31  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.11/0.31  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.11/0.31  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % WCLimit  : 300
% 0.11/0.31  % DateTime : Thu May  2 23:41:14 EDT 2024
% 0.11/0.32  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.16/0.42  Running UEQ theorem proving
% 0.16/0.42  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/run_problem --schedule casc_24_ueq --heuristic_context casc_unsat --no_cores 8 /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p 300
% 3.78/1.12  % SZS status Started for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  %---------------- iProver v3.9 (pre CASC 2024/SMT-COMP 2024) ----------------%
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------  iProver source info
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  git: date: 2024-05-02 19:28:25 +0000
% 3.78/1.12  git: sha1: a33b5eb135c74074ba803943bb12f2ebd971352f
% 3.78/1.12  git: non_committed_changes: false
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Parsing...successful
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Preprocessing... sup_sim: 0  sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e  pe_s  pe_e 
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Preprocessing... gs_s  sp: 0 0s  gs_e  snvd_s sp: 0 0s snvd_e 
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Preprocessing... sf_s  rm: 0 0s  sf_e 
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Problem Properties 
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  clauses                                 17
% 3.78/1.12  conjectures                             1
% 3.78/1.12  EPR                                     0
% 3.78/1.12  Horn                                    17
% 3.78/1.12  unary                                   17
% 3.78/1.12  binary                                  0
% 3.78/1.12  lits                                    17
% 3.78/1.12  lits eq                                 17
% 3.78/1.12  fd_pure                                 0
% 3.78/1.12  fd_pseudo                               0
% 3.78/1.12  fd_cond                                 0
% 3.78/1.12  fd_pseudo_cond                          0
% 3.78/1.12  AC symbols                              2
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Input Options Time Limit: Unbounded
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ 
% 3.78/1.12  Current options:
% 3.78/1.12  ------ 
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  ------ Proving...
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark.p
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  % SZS output start CNFRefutation for theBenchmark.p
% See solution above
% 3.78/1.12  
% 3.78/1.12  
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------