TSTP Solution File: GRP175-3 by E-SAT---3.1.00

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : E-SAT---3.1.00
% Problem  : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : run_E %s %d THM

% Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Sat May  4 07:57:49 EDT 2024

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.21s 0.53s
% Output   : CNFRefutation 0.21s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    3
%            Number of leaves      :    8
% Syntax   : Number of clauses     :   21 (  21 unt;   0 nHn;   7 RR)
%            Number of literals    :   21 (  20 equ;   3 neg)
%            Maximal clause size   :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    7 (   7 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :   28 (   2 sgn)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
cnf(prove_p06c,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',prove_p06c) ).

cnf(monotony_glb1,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',monotony_glb1) ).

cnf(left_inverse,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',left_inverse) ).

cnf(symmetry_of_glb,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).

cnf(monotony_glb2,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',monotony_glb2) ).

cnf(left_identity,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',left_identity) ).

cnf(glb_absorbtion,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',glb_absorbtion) ).

cnf(p06c_1,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p',p06c_1) ).

cnf(c_0_8,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != identity,
    inference(fof_simplification,[status(thm)],[prove_p06c]) ).

cnf(c_0_9,axiom,
    multiply(X1,greatest_lower_bound(X2,X3)) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X2),multiply(X1,X3)),
    monotony_glb1 ).

cnf(c_0_10,axiom,
    multiply(inverse(X1),X1) = identity,
    left_inverse ).

cnf(c_0_11,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2) = greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1),
    symmetry_of_glb ).

cnf(c_0_12,axiom,
    multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2),X3) = greatest_lower_bound(multiply(X1,X3),multiply(X2,X3)),
    monotony_glb2 ).

cnf(c_0_13,axiom,
    multiply(identity,X1) = X1,
    left_identity ).

cnf(c_0_14,axiom,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,least_upper_bound(X1,X2)) = X1,
    glb_absorbtion ).

cnf(c_0_15,hypothesis,
    least_upper_bound(identity,b) = b,
    p06c_1 ).

cnf(c_0_16,negated_conjecture,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(a),multiply(b,a))) != identity,
    c_0_8 ).

cnf(c_0_17,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,multiply(inverse(X1),X2)) = multiply(inverse(X1),greatest_lower_bound(X2,X1)),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_9,c_0_10]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_18,plain,
    greatest_lower_bound(X1,multiply(X2,X1)) = multiply(greatest_lower_bound(X2,identity),X1),
    inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_12,c_0_13]),c_0_11]) ).

cnf(c_0_19,hypothesis,
    greatest_lower_bound(identity,b) = identity,
    inference(spm,[status(thm)],[c_0_14,c_0_15]) ).

cnf(c_0_20,negated_conjecture,
    $false,
    inference(cn,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[inference(rw,[status(thm)],[c_0_16,c_0_17]),c_0_11]),c_0_18]),c_0_11]),c_0_19]),c_0_13]),c_0_10])]),
    [proof] ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.12  % Problem    : GRP175-3 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.14  % Command    : run_E %s %d THM
% 0.13/0.35  % Computer : n024.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime   : Fri May  3 16:17:53 EDT 2024
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.21/0.49  Running first-order model finding
% 0.21/0.49  Running: /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/eprover --delete-bad-limit=2000000000 --definitional-cnf=24 -s --print-statistics -R --print-version --proof-object --satauto-schedule=8 --cpu-limit=300 /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.FQ0aVh5BG0/E---3.1_11978.p
% 0.21/0.53  # Version: 3.1.0
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_3 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting new_bool_1 with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting sh5l with 300s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12055 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 675s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_060_C18_F1_PI_SE_CS_SP_CO_S0Y with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting U----_043_B31_F1_PI_AE_CS_SP_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S5PRR_S2S with 136s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with pid 12060 completed with status 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Result found by G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing class: FSMSSMSSSSSNFFN.
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 4 strats onto 8 cores with 300 seconds (2400 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 1500s (5) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # No SInE strategy applied
% 0.21/0.53  # Search class: FUUPM-FFSF21-MFFFFFNN
% 0.21/0.53  # Scheduled 7 strats onto 5 cores with 1500 seconds (1500 total)
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting H----_047_C09_12_F1_AE_ND_CS_SP_S2S with 675s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Starting G-E--_208_C18_F1_SE_CS_SOS_SP_PS_S5PRR_RG_S04AN with 151s (1) cores
% 0.21/0.53  # Preprocessing time       : 0.001 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Presaturation interreduction done
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # Proof found!
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.21/0.53  # SZS output start CNFRefutation
% See solution above
% 0.21/0.53  # Parsed axioms                        : 17
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed by relevancy pruning/SinE    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses                      : 17
% 0.21/0.53  # Removed in clause preprocessing      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Initial clauses in saturation        : 17
% 0.21/0.53  # Processed clauses                    : 270
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of these trivial                  : 67
% 0.21/0.53  # ...subsumed                          : 89
% 0.21/0.53  # ...remaining for further processing  : 114
% 0.21/0.53  # Other redundant clauses eliminated   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Clauses deleted for lack of memory   : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-subsumed                    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Backward-rewritten                   : 9
% 0.21/0.53  # Generated clauses                    : 2497
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of the previous two non-redundant : 1367
% 0.21/0.53  # ...aggressively subsumed             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Contextual simplify-reflections      : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Paramodulations                      : 2497
% 0.21/0.53  # Factorizations                       : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # NegExts                              : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Equation resolutions                 : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Disequality decompositions           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Total rewrite steps                  : 2523
% 0.21/0.53  # ...of those cached                   : 1778
% 0.21/0.53  # Propositional unsat checks           : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check models        : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional check unsatisfiable : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional clauses after purity: 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional unsat core size     : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional preprocessing time  : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional encoding time       : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Propositional solver time         : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop preproc time    : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop encoding time   : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  #    Success case prop solver time     : 0.000
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of processed clauses  : 88
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive orientable unit clauses  : 81
% 0.21/0.53  #    Positive unorientable unit clauses: 7
% 0.21/0.53  #    Negative unit clauses             : 0
% 0.21/0.53  #    Non-unit-clauses                  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of unprocessed clauses: 1127
% 0.21/0.53  # ...number of literals in the above   : 1127
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived formulas  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Current number of archived clauses   : 26
% 0.21/0.53  # Clause-clause subsumption calls (NU) : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Rec. Clause-clause subsumption calls : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Non-unit clause-clause subsumptions  : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Unit Clause-clause subsumption calls : 16
% 0.21/0.53  # Rewrite failures with RHS unbound    : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match attempts            : 250
% 0.21/0.53  # BW rewrite match successes           : 127
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation attempts                : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Condensation successes               : 0
% 0.21/0.53  # Termbank termtop insertions          : 21924
% 0.21/0.53  # Search garbage collected termcells   : 2
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.023 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.005 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.028 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1572 pages
% 0.21/0.53  
% 0.21/0.53  # -------------------------------------------------
% 0.21/0.53  # User time                : 0.118 s
% 0.21/0.53  # System time              : 0.022 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Total time               : 0.140 s
% 0.21/0.53  # Maximum resident set size: 1688 pages
% 0.21/0.53  % E---3.1 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------