TSTP Solution File: GRP158-1 by SOS---2.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SOS---2.0
% Problem  : GRP158-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : sos-script %s

% Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 600s
% DateTime : Sat Jul 16 11:41:58 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.46s 0.67s
% Output   : Refutation 0.46s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : -

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.07/0.13  % Problem  : GRP158-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.07/0.13  % Command  : sos-script %s
% 0.13/0.34  % Computer : n022.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35  % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35  % WCLimit  : 600
% 0.13/0.35  % DateTime : Mon Jun 13 08:23:18 EDT 2022
% 0.13/0.35  % CPUTime  : 
% 0.13/0.36  ----- Otter 3.2, August 2001 -----
% 0.13/0.36  The process was started by sandbox on n022.cluster.edu,
% 0.13/0.36  Mon Jun 13 08:23:18 2022
% 0.13/0.36  The command was "./sos".  The process ID is 17726.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  set(prolog_style_variables).
% 0.13/0.36  set(auto).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(auto1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(process_input).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_kept).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_new_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(print_back_sub).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(control_memory).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_mem, 12000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_given_ratio, 4).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(stats_level, 1).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(pick_semantic_ratio, 3).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(sos_limit, 5000).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: assign(max_weight, 60).
% 0.13/0.36  clear(print_given).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  list(usable).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  SCAN INPUT: prop=0, horn=1, equality=1, symmetry=0, max_lits=1.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  All clauses are units, and equality is present; the
% 0.13/0.36  strategy will be Knuth-Bendix with positive clauses in sos.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(knuth_bendix).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_into).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_from_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: clear(para_into_right).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(para_from_vars).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(eq_units_both_ways).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod_all).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(dynamic_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(order_eq).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(back_demod).
% 0.13/0.36     dependent: set(lrpo).
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process usable:
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ------------> process sos:
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 8 during input processing: 0 [copy,8,flip.1] {-} greatest_lower_bound(A,B)=greatest_lower_bound(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 9 during input processing: 0 [copy,9,flip.1] {-} least_upper_bound(A,B)=least_upper_bound(B,A).
% 0.13/0.36    Following clause subsumed by 34 during input processing: 0 [copy,34,flip.1] {-} A=A.
% 0.13/0.36  
% 0.13/0.36  ======= end of input processing =======
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 1 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  -------------- Softie stats --------------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  UPDATE_STOP: 300
% 0.20/0.41  SFINDER_TIME_LIMIT: 2
% 0.20/0.41  SHORT_CLAUSE_CUTOFF: 4
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses in intial UL: 1
% 0.20/0.41  number of clauses initially in problem: 32
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of clauses intially in UL: 3
% 0.20/0.41  percentage of distinct symbols occuring in initial UL: 66
% 0.20/0.41  percent of all initial clauses that are short: 100
% 0.20/0.41  absolute distinct symbol count: 9
% 0.20/0.41     distinct predicate count: 1
% 0.20/0.41     distinct function count: 4
% 0.20/0.41     distinct constant count: 4
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  ---------- no more Softie stats ----------
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Model 2 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.20/0.41  
% 0.20/0.41  =========== start of search ===========
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  -------- PROOF -------- 
% 0.46/0.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.67  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 3 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 4 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 5 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 6 (0.00 seconds, 0 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 7 [ 1 1 184 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on insertions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 8 [ 1 1 96 ] (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 9 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 10 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Stopped by limit on number of solutions
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  ----> UNIT CONFLICT at   0.27 sec ----> 146 [binary,144.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Length of proof is 5.  Level of proof is 5.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  ---------------- PROOF ----------------
% 0.46/0.67  % SZS status Unsatisfiable
% 0.46/0.67  % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  1 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(multiply(c,a),multiply(c,b))!=multiply(c,a).
% 0.46/0.67  8 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(A,B)=greatest_lower_bound(B,A).
% 0.46/0.67  9 [] {+} least_upper_bound(A,B)=least_upper_bound(B,A).
% 0.46/0.67  20 [] {+} least_upper_bound(A,greatest_lower_bound(A,B))=A.
% 0.46/0.67  22 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(A,least_upper_bound(A,B))=A.
% 0.46/0.67  24 [] {-} multiply(A,least_upper_bound(B,C))=least_upper_bound(multiply(A,B),multiply(A,C)).
% 0.46/0.67  32 [] {+} greatest_lower_bound(a,b)=a.
% 0.46/0.67  35 [para_into,8.1.1,32.1.1,flip.1] {+} greatest_lower_bound(b,a)=a.
% 0.46/0.67  38 [para_into,20.1.1.2,35.1.1] {+} least_upper_bound(b,a)=b.
% 0.46/0.67  50 [para_into,38.1.1,9.1.1] {+} least_upper_bound(a,b)=b.
% 0.46/0.67  81 [para_from,50.1.1,24.1.1.2,flip.1] {-} least_upper_bound(multiply(A,a),multiply(A,b))=multiply(A,b).
% 0.46/0.67  144 [para_from,81.1.1,22.1.1.2] {-} greatest_lower_bound(multiply(A,a),multiply(A,b))=multiply(A,a).
% 0.46/0.67  146 [binary,144.1,1.1] {+} $F.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.46/0.67  ------------ end of proof -------------
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Search stopped by max_proofs option.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  ============ end of search ============
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  ----------- soft-scott stats ----------
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  true clauses given           6      (25.0%)
% 0.46/0.67  false clauses given         18
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67        FALSE     TRUE
% 0.46/0.67     5  0         1
% 0.46/0.67     6  0         1
% 0.46/0.67     7  0         4
% 0.46/0.67     9  0         9
% 0.46/0.67    11  2         11
% 0.46/0.67    12  2         1
% 0.46/0.67    13  5         4
% 0.46/0.67    14  2         0
% 0.46/0.67    15  3         0
% 0.46/0.67    16  2         0
% 0.46/0.67    17  1         0
% 0.46/0.67    21  1         0
% 0.46/0.67  tot:  18        31      (63.3% true)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Model 11 (0.00 seconds, 250000 Inserts)
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  That finishes the proof of the theorem.
% 0.46/0.67  
% 0.46/0.67  Process 17726 finished Mon Jun 13 08:23:18 2022
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------