TSTP Solution File: GRP139-1 by SnakeForV-SAT---1.0

View Problem - Process Solution

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File     : SnakeForV-SAT---1.0
% Problem  : GRP139-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm  : none
% Format   : tptp:raw
% Command  : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s

% Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit  : 300s
% DateTime : Wed Aug 31 16:20:34 EDT 2022

% Result   : Unsatisfiable 0.19s 0.48s
% Output   : Refutation 0.19s
% Verified : 
% SZS Type : Refutation
%            Derivation depth      :    4
%            Number of leaves      :    5
% Syntax   : Number of formulae    :   10 (  10 unt;   0 def)
%            Number of atoms       :   10 (   9 equ)
%            Maximal formula atoms :    1 (   1 avg)
%            Number of connectives :    4 (   4   ~;   0   |;   0   &)
%                                         (   0 <=>;   0  =>;   0  <=;   0 <~>)
%            Maximal formula depth :    4 (   2 avg)
%            Maximal term depth    :    3 (   1 avg)
%            Number of predicates  :    2 (   0 usr;   1 prp; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of functors    :    4 (   4 usr;   3 con; 0-2 aty)
%            Number of variables   :    5 (   5   !;   0   ?)

% Comments : 
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
fof(f64,plain,
    $false,
    inference(subsumption_resolution,[],[f63,f16]) ).

fof(f16,axiom,
    c = greatest_lower_bound(a,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1b_1_1) ).

fof(f63,plain,
    c != greatest_lower_bound(a,c),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f62,f28]) ).

fof(f28,plain,
    c = greatest_lower_bound(c,b),
    inference(superposition,[],[f17,f4]) ).

fof(f4,axiom,
    ! [X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1) = greatest_lower_bound(X1,X0),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',symmetry_of_glb) ).

fof(f17,axiom,
    c = greatest_lower_bound(b,c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',ax_glb1b_2_2) ).

fof(f62,plain,
    c != greatest_lower_bound(a,greatest_lower_bound(c,b)),
    inference(forward_demodulation,[],[f54,f4]) ).

fof(f54,plain,
    c != greatest_lower_bound(a,greatest_lower_bound(b,c)),
    inference(superposition,[],[f18,f6]) ).

fof(f6,axiom,
    ! [X2,X0,X1] : greatest_lower_bound(X0,greatest_lower_bound(X1,X2)) = greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(X0,X1),X2),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',associativity_of_glb) ).

fof(f18,axiom,
    c != greatest_lower_bound(greatest_lower_bound(a,b),c),
    file('/export/starexec/sandbox2/benchmark/theBenchmark.p',prove_ax_glb1b) ).

%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.10/0.12  % Problem    : GRP139-1 : TPTP v8.1.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.10/0.13  % Command    : vampire --input_syntax tptp --proof tptp --output_axiom_names on --mode portfolio --schedule snake_tptp_sat --cores 0 -t %d %s
% 0.12/0.34  % Computer : n010.cluster.edu
% 0.12/0.34  % Model    : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPU      : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.12/0.34  % Memory   : 8042.1875MB
% 0.12/0.34  % OS       : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.12/0.34  % CPULimit   : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % WCLimit    : 300
% 0.12/0.34  % DateTime   : Mon Aug 29 22:09:14 EDT 2022
% 0.12/0.34  % CPUTime    : 
% 0.19/0.45  % (2939)fmb+10_1:1_bce=on:i=59:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/59Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.45  % (2928)fmb+10_1:1_fmbsr=2.0:nm=4:skr=on:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.45  TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.45  TRYING [1]
% 0.19/0.45  TRYING [2]
% 0.19/0.46  TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.46  TRYING [3]
% 0.19/0.47  % (2938)dis+34_1:32_abs=on:add=off:bsr=on:gsp=on:sp=weighted_frequency:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  % (2936)ins+10_1:1_awrs=decay:awrsf=30:bsr=unit_only:foolp=on:igrr=8/457:igs=10:igwr=on:nwc=1.5:sp=weighted_frequency:to=lpo:uhcvi=on:i=68:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/68Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  % (2937)ott+11_2:3_av=off:fde=unused:nwc=5.0:tgt=ground:i=75:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/75Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  % (2925)ott+10_1:32_bd=off:fsr=off:newcnf=on:tgt=full:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.47  % (2946)ott+10_1:1_kws=precedence:tgt=ground:i=482:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/482Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2931)ott-1_1:6_av=off:cond=on:fsr=off:nwc=3.0:i=51:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/51Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2935)ott+10_1:5_bd=off:tgt=full:i=99:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/99Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)ott+4_1:1_av=off:bd=off:nwc=5.0:s2a=on:s2at=2.0:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsql=off:slsqr=1,2:sp=frequency:i=37:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/37Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2951)ott+10_7:2_awrs=decay:awrsf=8:bd=preordered:drc=off:fd=preordered:fde=unused:fsr=off:slsq=on:slsqc=2:slsqr=5,8:sp=const_min:spb=units:to=lpo:i=355:si=on:rawr=on:rtra=on_0 on theBenchmark for (2999ds/355Mi)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)First to succeed.
% 0.19/0.48  % (2951)Also succeeded, but the first one will report.
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Refutation found. Thanks to Tanya!
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS status Unsatisfiable for theBenchmark
% 0.19/0.48  % SZS output start Proof for theBenchmark
% See solution above
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Version: Vampire 4.7 (commit 807e37dd9 on 2022-08-23 09:55:27 +0200)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Linked with Z3 4.8.13.0 f03d756e086f81f2596157241e0decfb1c982299 z3-4.8.4-5390-gf03d756e0
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Termination reason: Refutation
% 0.19/0.48  
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Memory used [KB]: 895
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Time elapsed: 0.096 s
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)Instructions burned: 4 (million)
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2924)------------------------------
% 0.19/0.48  % (2921)Success in time 0.136 s
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------