TSTP Solution File: GRP133-2.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP133-2.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art05.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:39:01 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP10178/GRP/GRP133-2.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 45] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 141] [nf = 8] [nu = 6] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 351] [nf = 254] [nu = 16] [ut = 28]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 779] [nf = 500] [nu = 56] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 2091] [nf = 2474] [nu = 102] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4195] [nf = 4448] [nu = 260] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 11187] [nf = 15302] [nu = 418] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 21171] [nf = 26156] [nu = 864] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 54659] [nf = 83250] [nu = 1310] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 99251] [nf = 140344] [nu = 2716] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 258243] [nf = 416766] [nu = 4122] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 460051] [nf = 693188] [nu = 7960] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 5 secs [nr = 1188387] [nf = 2080522] [nu = 11798] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 10 secs [nr = 2080691] [nf = 3467856] [nu = 23572] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 27 secs [nr = 5537987] [nf = 9975958] [nu = 35346] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 48 secs [nr = 9637587] [nf = 16484060] [nu = 67088] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24252471] [nf = 46874494] [nu = 97808] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24252580] [nf = 46874502] [nu = 97822] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24252807] [nf = 46874772] [nu = 97836] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24253441] [nf = 46875042] [nu = 97882] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24256090] [nf = 46880994] [nu = 97928] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 24269811] [nf = 46887018] [nu = 98102] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 24411741] [nf = 47062726] [nu = 98276] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 127 secs [nr = 26291050] [nf = 47774382] [nu = 98770] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 237 secs [nr = 58565285] [nf = 54446298] [nu = 179968] [ut = 30]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 152655930
% resolvents: 79677447 factors: 72978483
% Number of unit clauses generated: 181680
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.12
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25 [2] = 3 [4] = 2
% Total = 30
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 181680 [2] = 54638210 [3] = 41571472 [4] = 28470652 [5] = 18162685 [6] = 8083617
% [7] = 1547614
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)12
% [2] greater_2 (+)6 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)3 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)5
% ------------------
% Total: (+)13 (-)17
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 30
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 299963860
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 1462147
% Number of successful unifications: 152655930
% Number of unification failures: 368458451
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 315218417
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 15840724
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 114075
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 26
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 61
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.43
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 43
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 521114381
% ConstructUnitClause() = 114080
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.08 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 508853
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------