TSTP Solution File: GRP132-1.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP132-1.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art07.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:33:47 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP7053/GRP/GRP132-1.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ............................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 60] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 180] [nf = 6] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 300] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 780] [nf = 42] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1270] [nf = 72] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1830] [nf = 104] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4580] [nf = 196] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 63830] [nf = 288] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 343744] [nf = 152084] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 50 secs [nr = 23007164] [nf = 303864] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 133 secs [nr = 57103294] [nf = 8672916] [nu = 0] [ut = 25]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 133493612
% resolvents: 124379556 factors: 9114056
% Number of unit clauses generated: 0
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.00
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 25
% Total = 25
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [2] = 1320 [3] = 48960 [4] = 4149632 [5] = 86709914 [6] = 28814277 [7] = 12172341
% [8] = 1597168
% Average size of a generated clause: 6.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)20
% [2] product_3 (+)0 (-)0
% ------------------
% Total: (+)5 (-)20
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 25
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 459852663
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 100564388
% Number of successful unifications: 133493612
% Number of unification failures: 568853984
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 1587172
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 371242
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 0
% Max entries in substitution set: 14
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 2
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 10
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 45
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.22
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 42
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 702347596
% ConstructUnitClause() = 0
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.00 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 444979
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------