TSTP Solution File: GRP128-4.004 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP128-4.004 : TPTP v5.0.0. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:22:28 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.03s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP4428/GRP/GRP128-4.004+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 36] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 108] [nf = 12] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 504] [nf = 888] [nu = 0] [ut = 16]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1836] [nf = 1764] [nu = 216] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 14292] [nf = 23376] [nu = 504] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 40860] [nf = 44988] [nu = 2520] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 271332] [nf = 410472] [nu = 4536] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 660204] [nf = 775956] [nu = 28440] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 3993588] [nf = 6072000] [nu = 52344] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7855056] [nf = 9679374] [nu = 285360] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7855236] [nf = 9679386] [nu = 285360] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7855782] [nf = 9680370] [nu = 285360] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7859880] [nf = 9681354] [nu = 285648] [ut = 52]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 32 secs [nr = 7911810] [nf = 9789300] [nu = 288768] [ut = 56]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 47 secs [nr = 12063000] [nf = 10005950] [nu = 2036232] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 191 secs [nr = 40898690] [nf = 51833200] [nu = 4896912] [ut = 60]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 124074001
% resolvents: 70698704 factors: 53375297
% Number of unit clauses generated: 18825550
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 15.17
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 16 [4] = 36 [5] = 4 [6] = 4
% Total = 60
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 18825550 [2] = 46643609 [3] = 45716507 [4] = 11951141 [5] = 914082 [6] = 22824
% [7] = 288
% Average size of a generated clause: 3.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)4 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)4 (-)12
% [2] product_3 (+)4 (-)36
% ------------------
% Total: (+)12 (-)48
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 60
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 221508857
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 124074001
% Number of unification failures: 597987816
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 192
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 106101218
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 3359994
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 15239284
% Max entries in substitution set: 20
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 16913610
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 44
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 156
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.28
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 41
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 722061817
% ConstructUnitClause() = 16913654
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 18.21 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 413580
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------