TSTP Solution File: GRP128-3.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP128-3.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art06.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:19:54 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3019/GRP/GRP128-3.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing ......................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 98] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 46]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 298] [nf = 10] [nu = 4] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 660] [nf = 452] [nu = 8] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 1362] [nf = 894] [nu = 92] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 3448] [nf = 3704] [nu = 176] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 6734] [nf = 6514] [nu = 420] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 16996] [nf = 19356] [nu = 664] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 31898] [nf = 32198] [nu = 1548] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 75504] [nf = 87648] [nu = 2432] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 137670] [nf = 143098] [nu = 5876] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 319612] [nf = 377380] [nu = 9320] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 3 secs [nr = 575794] [nf = 611662] [nu = 23004] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 6 secs [nr = 1327880] [nf = 1586472] [nu = 36688] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 11 secs [nr = 2376926] [nf = 2561282] [nu = 91332] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 24 secs [nr = 5459988] [nf = 6573804] [nu = 145976] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 43 secs [nr = 9730890] [nf = 10586326] [nu = 364460] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% t = 97 secs [nr = 22289056] [nf = 26976496] [nu = 582944] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 18 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28003325] [nf = 32110730] [nu = 898504] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28003545] [nf = 32110740] [nu = 898508] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28003969] [nf = 32111206] [nu = 898512] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28006130] [nf = 32111898] [nu = 898596] [ut = 67]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28025714] [nf = 32121282] [nu = 899160] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28061318] [nf = 32130668] [nu = 899884] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28183998] [nf = 32405846] [nu = 900608] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 125 secs [nr = 28649601] [nf = 32688240] [nu = 901972] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 147 secs [nr = 32482215] [nf = 42890228] [nu = 903336] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 280 secs [nr = 51899891] [nf = 53517016] [nu = 907260] [ut = 71]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 122144452
% resolvents: 55349936 factors: 66794516
% Number of unit clauses generated: 908480
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.74
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 46 [2] = 1 [4] = 20 [5] = 4
% Total = 71
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 908480 [2] = 38634329 [3] = 36426797 [4] = 32651216 [5] = 11937903 [6] = 1585727
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)1 (-)4
% [2] equalish_2 (+)1 (-)20
% [3] greater_2 (+)15 (-)0
% [4] next_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [5] product_3 (+)0 (-)20
% ------------------
% Total: (+)27 (-)44
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 71
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 277546976
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 122144452
% Number of unification failures: 529944943
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 24
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 319284978
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 52687999
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 32348272
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 459183
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 54
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 157
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.34
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 46
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 652089395
% ConstructUnitClause() = 459208
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.45 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 407148
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 304 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------