TSTP Solution File: GRP128-2.006 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP128-2.006 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art02.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:17:55 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.04s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP11988/GRP/GRP128-2.006+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .............................................................. done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 110] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 56]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 350] [nf = 8] [nu = 20] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 826] [nf = 650] [nu = 40] [ut = 66]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1842] [nf = 1292] [nu = 180] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 4942] [nf = 5494] [nu = 320] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 9882] [nf = 9696] [nu = 700] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 25286] [nf = 29018] [nu = 1080] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 47810] [nf = 48340] [nu = 2420] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 113470] [nf = 132054] [nu = 3760] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 207610] [nf = 215768] [nu = 8940] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 482118] [nf = 570210] [nu = 14120] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 870546] [nf = 924652] [nu = 34660] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 13 ...
% t = 9 secs [nr = 2006766] [nf = 2401486] [nu = 55200] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 14 ...
% t = 16 secs [nr = 3598666] [nf = 3878320] [nu = 137180] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 15 ...
% t = 36 secs [nr = 8260694] [nf = 9963162] [nu = 219160] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 16 ...
% t = 64 secs [nr = 14745442] [nf = 16048004] [nu = 546900] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 17 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28358156] [nf = 33688084] [nu = 800940] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28358436] [nf = 33688092] [nu = 800960] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28358953] [nf = 33688758] [nu = 800980] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28360624] [nf = 33689424] [nu = 801120] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28366915] [nf = 33703034] [nu = 801260] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 122 secs [nr = 28394450] [nf = 33716644] [nu = 801640] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 28536618] [nf = 34125527] [nu = 802020] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 126 secs [nr = 29186837] [nf = 34538454] [nu = 803360] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 178 secs [nr = 34786036] [nf = 49521737] [nu = 804700] [ut = 96]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 145269370
% resolvents: 75276269 factors: 69993101
% Number of unit clauses generated: 809880
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 0.56
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 56 [2] = 10 [4] = 30
% Total = 96
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 809880 [2] = 41064086 [3] = 43509842 [4] = 37228938 [5] = 15647972 [6] = 5324871
% [7] = 1683781
% Average size of a generated clause: 4.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)6 (-)0
% [1] equalish_2 (+)0 (-)30
% [2] greater_2 (+)15 (-)0
% [3] next_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [4] product_3 (+)0 (-)40
% ------------------
% Total: (+)26 (-)70
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 96
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 265444995
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 145269370
% Number of unification failures: 357238492
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 0
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 345361262
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 31284228
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 26120802
% Max entries in substitution set: 36
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 332880
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 61
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 226
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.27
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 45
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 502507862
% ConstructUnitClause() = 332920
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 0.36 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 484231
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------