TSTP Solution File: GRP126-3.005 by CARINE---0.734
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : CARINE---0.734
% Problem : GRP126-3.005 : TPTP v5.0.0. Released v1.2.0.
% Transfm : add_equality
% Format : carine
% Command : carine %s t=%d xo=off uct=32000
% Computer : art04.cs.miami.edu
% Model : i686 i686
% CPU : Intel(R) Pentium(R) 4 CPU 2.80GHz @ 2793MHz
% Memory : 2018MB
% OS : Linux 2.6.26.8-57.fc8
% CPULimit : 300s
% DateTime : Sat Nov 27 21:11:43 EST 2010
% Result : Timeout 300.05s
% Output : None
% Verified :
% SZS Type : None (Parsing solution fails)
% Syntax : Number of formulae : 0
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----NO SOLUTION OUTPUT BY SYSTEM
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% Command entered:
% /home/graph/tptp/Systems/CARINE---0.734/carine /tmp/SystemOnTPTP3552/GRP/GRP126-3.005+noeq.car t=300 xo=off uct=32000
% CARINE version 0.734 (Dec 2003)
% Initializing tables ... done.
% Parsing .......................................................... done.
% Calculating time slices ... done.
% Building Lookup Tables ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 105] [nf = 0] [nu = 0] [ut = 47]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 575] [nf = 10] [nu = 258] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 1313] [nf = 552] [nu = 556] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 5308] [nf = 1094] [nu = 3038] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 12566] [nf = 8522] [nu = 5520] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 0 secs [nr = 49856] [nf = 15950] [nu = 27298] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 1 secs [nr = 123188] [nf = 99062] [nu = 49076] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% t = 2 secs [nr = 467296] [nf = 182174] [nu = 244358] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 9 ...
% t = 4 secs [nr = 1166240] [nf = 1031118] [nu = 439640] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 10 ...
% t = 14 secs [nr = 4391096] [nf = 1880062] [nu = 2263658] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 11 ...
% t = 37 secs [nr = 11034880] [nf = 9871822] [nu = 4087676] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 12 ...
% Entering time slice 2
% Updating parameters ... done.
% Looking for a proof at depth = 1 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 38386623] [nf = 16041542] [nu = 19891861] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 2 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 38387193] [nf = 16041552] [nu = 19892159] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 3 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 38387974] [nf = 16042118] [nu = 19892457] [ut = 109]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 4 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 38398222] [nf = 16042910] [nu = 19897327] [ut = 114]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 5 ...
% t = 123 secs [nr = 38436863] [nf = 16069626] [nu = 19903399] [ut = 123]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 6 ...
% t = 124 secs [nr = 38986280] [nf = 16099178] [nu = 20157860] [ut = 135]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 7 ...
% t = 141 secs [nr = 43706848] [nf = 21118634] [nu = 21577859] [ut = 135]
% Looking for a proof at depth = 8 ...
% TIME IS UP!
% ---------------------------------------------
% | Statistics |
% ---------------------------------------------
% Profile 3: Performance Statistics:
% ==================================
% Total number of generated clauses: 108326055
% resolvents: 86421301 factors: 21904754
% Number of unit clauses generated: 48860365
% % unit clauses generated to total clauses generated: 45.10
% Number of unit clauses constructed and retained at depth [x]:
% =============================================================
% [0] = 47 [2] = 62 [4] = 5 [5] = 9 [6] = 12
% Total = 135
% Number of generated clauses having [x] literals:
% ------------------------------------------------
% [1] = 48860365 [2] = 44265561 [3] = 14165839 [4] = 965202 [5] = 61010 [6] = 8078
% Average size of a generated clause: 2.0
% Number of unit clauses per predicate list:
% ==========================================
% [0] group_element_1 (+)5 (-)0
% [1] cycle_2 (+)2 (-)13
% [2] equalish_2 (+)7 (-)20
% [3] greater_2 (+)15 (-)2
% [4] next_2 (+)5 (-)0
% [5] product_3 (+)6 (-)60
% ------------------
% Total: (+)40 (-)95
% Total number of unit clauses retained: 135
% Number of clauses skipped because of their length: 197623307
% N base clauses skippped in resolve-with-all-base-clauses
% because of the shortest resolvents table: 0
% Number of successful unifications: 108326055
% Number of unification failures: 427112720
% Number of unit to unit unification failures: 556
% N literal unification failure due to lookup root_id table: 113556276
% N base clause resolution failure due to lookup table: 15666913
% N UC-BCL resolution dropped due to lookup table: 66488
% Max entries in substitution set: 30
% N unit clauses dropped because they exceeded max values: 43344818
% N unit clauses dropped because too much nesting: 0
% N unit clauses not constrcuted because table was full: 0
% N unit clauses dropped because UCFA table was full: 0
% Max number of terms in a unit clause: 3
% Max term depth in a unit clause: 1
% Number of states in UCFA table: 84
% Total number of terms of all unit clauses in table: 331
% Max allowed number of states in UCFA: 80000
% Ratio n states used/total allowed states: 0.00
% Ratio n states used/total unit clauses terms: 0.25
% Number of symbols (columns) in UCFA: 46
% Profile 2: Number of calls to:
% ==============================
% PTUnify() = 535438775
% ConstructUnitClause() = 43344906
% Profile 1: Time spent in:
% =========================
% ConstructUnitClause() : 47.18 secs
% --------------------------------------------------------
% | |
% Inferences per sec: 361087
% | |
% --------------------------------------------------------
% Elapsed time: 303 secs
% CPU time: 300.00 secs
%
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------