TSTP Solution File: GRP125-4.003 by Zipperpin---2.1.9999
View Problem
- Process Solution
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
% File : Zipperpin---2.1.9999
% Problem : GRP125-4.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% Transfm : NO INFORMATION
% Format : NO INFORMATION
% Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7VbiAJn6L2 true
% Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% Model : x86_64 x86_64
% CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 2.10GHz
% Memory : 8042.1875MB
% OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% CPULimit : 300s
% WCLimit : 300s
% DateTime : Thu Aug 31 01:50:08 EDT 2023
% Result : Unsatisfiable 0.93s 0.77s
% Output : Refutation 0.93s
% Verified :
% SZS Type : -
% Comments :
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----WARNING: Could not form TPTP format derivation
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------
%----ORIGINAL SYSTEM OUTPUT
% 0.00/0.12 % Problem : GRP125-4.003 : TPTP v8.1.2. Bugfixed v1.2.1.
% 0.00/0.14 % Command : python3 /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/portfolio.lams.parallel.py %s %d /export/starexec/sandbox/tmp/tmp.7VbiAJn6L2 true
% 0.13/0.35 % Computer : n031.cluster.edu
% 0.13/0.35 % Model : x86_64 x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPU : Intel(R) Xeon(R) CPU E5-2620 v4 @ 2.10GHz
% 0.13/0.35 % Memory : 8042.1875MB
% 0.13/0.35 % OS : Linux 3.10.0-693.el7.x86_64
% 0.13/0.35 % CPULimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % WCLimit : 300
% 0.13/0.35 % DateTime : Mon Aug 28 21:25:10 EDT 2023
% 0.13/0.35 % CPUTime :
% 0.13/0.35 % Running portfolio for 300 s
% 0.13/0.35 % File : /export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p
% 0.13/0.35 % Number of cores: 8
% 0.13/0.35 % Python version: Python 3.6.8
% 0.13/0.35 % Running in FO mode
% 0.22/0.66 % Total configuration time : 435
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated wc time : 1092
% 0.22/0.66 % Estimated cpu time (7 cpus) : 156.0
% 0.22/0.70 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo6_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.93/0.72 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo3_bce.sh running for 75s
% 0.93/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo1_av.sh running for 75s
% 0.93/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo5.sh running for 50s
% 0.93/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo13.sh running for 50s
% 0.93/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo7.sh running for 63s
% 0.93/0.75 % /export/starexec/sandbox/solver/bin/fo/fo4.sh running for 50s
% 0.93/0.77 % Solved by fo/fo6_bce.sh.
% 0.93/0.77 % BCE start: 19
% 0.93/0.77 % BCE eliminated: 0
% 0.93/0.77 % PE start: 19
% 0.93/0.77 logic: neq
% 0.93/0.77 % PE eliminated: 0
% 0.93/0.77 % done 51 iterations in 0.049s
% 0.93/0.77 % SZS status Theorem for '/export/starexec/sandbox/benchmark/theBenchmark.p'
% 0.93/0.77 % SZS output start Refutation
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_1_type, type, e_1: $i).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(product_type, type, product: $i > $i > $i > $o).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(equalish_type, type, equalish: $i > $i > $o).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_2_type, type, e_2: $i).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(group_element_type, type, group_element: $i > $o).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_3_type, type, e_3: $i).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_3_is_not_e_1, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_3 @ e_1 ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_3 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_3_is_not_e_1])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(column_surjectivity, axiom,
% 0.93/0.77 (( ~( group_element @ X ) ) | ( ~( group_element @ Y ) ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( product @ X @ e_1 @ Y ) | ( product @ X @ e_2 @ Y ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( product @ X @ e_3 @ Y ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl1, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (group_element @ X1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ X0 @ e_1 @ X1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ X0 @ e_2 @ X1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ X0 @ e_3 @ X1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [column_surjectivity])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(product_idempotence, axiom, (product @ X @ X @ X)).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(product_total_function2, axiom,
% 0.93/0.77 (( ~( product @ X @ Y @ W ) ) | ( ~( product @ X @ Y @ Z ) ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( equalish @ W @ Z ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X3)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ X2 @ X3))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_total_function2])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl54, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X1) | (equalish @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl59, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 ( (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (group_element @ e_3)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ e_3 @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl1, zip_derived_cl54])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(element_3, axiom, (group_element @ e_3)).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl6, plain, ( (group_element @ e_3)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_3])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl61, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 ( (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ e_3 @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl59, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl11, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_3 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_3_is_not_e_1])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl74, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 ((~ (group_element @ e_1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl61, zip_derived_cl11])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(element_1, axiom, (group_element @ e_1)).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl4, plain, ( (group_element @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_1])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl76, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (( (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_1) | (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl74, zip_derived_cl4])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl61, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 ( (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (group_element @ X0)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ e_3 @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl59, zip_derived_cl6])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_3_is_not_e_2, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_3 @ e_2 ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl12, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_3 @ e_2)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_3_is_not_e_2])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl75, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 ((~ (group_element @ e_2)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_2)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_2))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl61, zip_derived_cl12])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(element_2, axiom, (group_element @ e_2)).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl5, plain, ( (group_element @ e_2)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [element_2])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl77, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (( (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_2) | (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_2))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl75, zip_derived_cl5])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl17, plain, (![X0 : $i]: (product @ X0 @ X0 @ X0)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_idempotence])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(product_left_cancellation, axiom,
% 0.93/0.77 (( ~( product @ W @ Y @ X ) ) | ( ~( product @ Z @ Y @ X ) ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( equalish @ W @ Z ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl16, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (product @ X3 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ X0 @ X3))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_left_cancellation])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl133, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X1 @ X0 @ X0) | (equalish @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl146, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (( (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_2) | (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl77, zip_derived_cl133])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_2_is_not_e_3, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_2 @ e_3 ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl10, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_2 @ e_3)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_2_is_not_e_3])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl170, plain, ( (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_2)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl146, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl14, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X3)
% 0.93/0.77 | (equalish @ X2 @ X3))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [product_total_function2])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl173, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ X0) | (equalish @ e_2 @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl170, zip_derived_cl14])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(e_2_is_not_e_1, axiom, (~( equalish @ e_2 @ e_1 ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl9, plain, (~ (equalish @ e_2 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [e_2_is_not_e_1])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl250, plain, (~ (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl173, zip_derived_cl9])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl252, plain, ( (product @ e_3 @ e_2 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl76, zip_derived_cl250])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl170, plain, ( (product @ e_3 @ e_1 @ e_2)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('clc', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl146, zip_derived_cl10])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(qg3_1, conjecture,
% 0.93/0.77 (~( ( ~( product @ Y @ X @ Z2 ) ) | ( ~( product @ Z1 @ Z2 @ X ) ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( product @ X @ Y @ Z1 ) ))).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zf_stmt_0, negated_conjecture,
% 0.93/0.77 (( ~( product @ Y @ X @ Z2 ) ) | ( ~( product @ Z1 @ Z2 @ X ) ) |
% 0.93/0.77 ( product @ X @ Y @ Z1 )),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf.neg', [status(esa)], [qg3_1])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl2, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i, X2 : $i, X3 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X0 @ X1 @ X2)
% 0.93/0.77 | ~ (product @ X3 @ X2 @ X1)
% 0.93/0.77 | (product @ X1 @ X0 @ X3))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('cnf', [status(esa)], [zf_stmt_0])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl171, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i]: (~ (product @ X0 @ e_2 @ e_1) | (product @ e_1 @ e_3 @ X0))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl170, zip_derived_cl2])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl262, plain, ( (product @ e_1 @ e_3 @ e_3)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl252, zip_derived_cl171])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl133, plain,
% 0.93/0.77 (![X0 : $i, X1 : $i]:
% 0.93/0.77 (~ (product @ X1 @ X0 @ X0) | (equalish @ X0 @ X1))),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl17, zip_derived_cl16])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl315, plain, ( (equalish @ e_3 @ e_1)),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('s_sup-', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl262, zip_derived_cl133])).
% 0.93/0.77 thf(zip_derived_cl321, plain, ($false),
% 0.93/0.77 inference('demod', [status(thm)], [zip_derived_cl11, zip_derived_cl315])).
% 0.93/0.77
% 0.93/0.77 % SZS output end Refutation
% 0.93/0.77
% 0.93/0.77
% 0.93/0.77 % Terminating...
% 1.47/0.85 % Runner terminated.
% 1.47/0.86 % Zipperpin 1.5 exiting
%------------------------------------------------------------------------------